Thegibbsgamble
I beg to meg
- Joined
- Oct 28, 2017
- Posts
- 5,601
- Reaction score
- 3,264
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
- Banned
- #26
I'll take your word for it, I'll stick to female sex.
You remind me of this.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

CAR v COL · GEE v WB · SYD v GWS · GCS v ESS · HAW v PA · ADE v StK · NM v RIC · WCE v FRE · MEL v BL ·
Weekend Wrap and "Liked, Learned, Hated" right here -- How did tipping go?
I'll take your word for it, I'll stick to female sex.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Sounds like Plugger is a bit on the heavy side and has been triggered.
Also why has every new thread on the GD board had politics or race bought up unnecessarily?
As pointed out earlier, BMI is bullshit. Now if there were accurate scales for fat % you could just stand on (although for this, even the wildly inaccurate home one's would do), then those would work.No need for toxic fat ads
just have BMI calculators where ever junk food is sold, with an alarm "step away from the counter" and immediately uploaded to youtube
As pointed out earlier, BMI is bullshit. Now if there were accurate scales for fat % you could just stand on (although for this, even the wildly inaccurate home one's would do), then those would work.
Really it's sugar (and carbs) in general that are the issue. Tax sugar heavily, use the money raised to subsidise low carb (including meat) and we'd have a healthier, slimmer, more long lived population. If people still want sugary stuff as a treat it wouldn't hurt, but it should be too much to be the easy to grab staple it is now.
![]()
I don’t about Tatts, but the rest definitely. Anyone then getting health complications from their choices, that can afford it, are forced to contribute to the cost of care (if can afford so no one is denied care, but those who have health issues and on welfare and have made bad choices make at least some of that instead vouchers that can only go to healthy food).I'd have people swipe their medicare cards when they purchase food, drink, tobacco, tatts and booze
I think many would change their habits if they felt they were been monitored
BMI is crap.
Majority of the AFL would be overweight/ obese.
100kgs and 6 foot 2
On [device_name] using BigFooty.com mobile app
Nearly cost me my job. I'm stocky af. Just under 6 foot and they wanted to use this bullshit at my work medical. ffs
Those bmi calculators for height weight are bullshit. AFL players have more muscle than your average couch potato.BMI is crap.
Majority of the AFL would be overweight/ obese.
100kgs and 6 foot 2
On [device_name] using BigFooty.com mobile app
Those bmi calculators for height weight are bullshit. AFL players have more muscle than your average couch potato.
Except most people are fat because they eat too much carbs; breads, pasta etc.Sugar tax is coming, about bloody time too.
Except most people are fat because they eat too much carbs; breads, pasta etc.
Go to Asia and they are way skinnier. (obviously poorer but there is a lot less wheat in their foods)
It's my understanding that it's an actual term for a medical condition defined by professionals though. The fact obesity has been normalized and morbid obesity (which I think is what you're thinking of) is the freakish outlier doesn't really factor into how the term is used in that context. Of course the cutoff is somewhat arbitrary. I assume it's based on where the health effects have been determined to kick in the most dramatically.When I think of obese people I think of those land whales that can barely walk a few steps without needing a rest and wash themselves with a rag on a stick.
Classifying people as obese when they are slightly overweight just doesn't seem right.