Ethical framework.....are you kidding me. So trade period opens, in which the club and he had it seems a handshake deal that 'in principle' the
terms of a new contract were settled. Then, two days into the trade window, bang. No consultation or negotiation based upon this in principle
agreement.
Not his fault???? FFS get a grip. This is his workings, not the AFL. He is not an unrestricted free agent. So the system is not built around him
and his poor decisions.
What pains me the most is this tree-hugging crap for every lame excuse we give to people who make a lot of money playing a sport.
There is no accountability for his actions, just the club as a whole taking it wholeheartedly in the you know what.
I like how you state he owes nothing to the club, raising the long term injury issues. Tell me when we've delisted someone due to long term
injuries, where the player's behaviour was above standard and was a club champion? Menzel, Snell, Domsy, are just a few over the years to which
the club has held onto and supported throughout their injuries. Catsinamerica on here stated well we are only giving this long term support to talented players, ie. without talent, you would be delisted. I beg to differ, Domsy wasn't that great as a forward and hadn't really been switched back yet, still we kept him on the list to better support him.
Yet you know better?
This decision by Bundy speaks highly of his behavioural problems, all linked to his virtues and ethics. This is a fair assessment of this decision,
but, is not an excuse by me to attack him, just the tree-huggers who believe this is not his fault. It is most definitely his fault and the club has
to now deal with it.
terms of a new contract were settled. Then, two days into the trade window, bang. No consultation or negotiation based upon this in principle
agreement.
Not his fault???? FFS get a grip. This is his workings, not the AFL. He is not an unrestricted free agent. So the system is not built around him
and his poor decisions.
What pains me the most is this tree-hugging crap for every lame excuse we give to people who make a lot of money playing a sport.
There is no accountability for his actions, just the club as a whole taking it wholeheartedly in the you know what.
I like how you state he owes nothing to the club, raising the long term injury issues. Tell me when we've delisted someone due to long term
injuries, where the player's behaviour was above standard and was a club champion? Menzel, Snell, Domsy, are just a few over the years to which
the club has held onto and supported throughout their injuries. Catsinamerica on here stated well we are only giving this long term support to talented players, ie. without talent, you would be delisted. I beg to differ, Domsy wasn't that great as a forward and hadn't really been switched back yet, still we kept him on the list to better support him.
Yet you know better?
This decision by Bundy speaks highly of his behavioural problems, all linked to his virtues and ethics. This is a fair assessment of this decision,
but, is not an excuse by me to attack him, just the tree-huggers who believe this is not his fault. It is most definitely his fault and the club has
to now deal with it.

