Strategy Trade and List Management thread 4 (Be sure to huddle around your transitor radio at 11 am Edition)

Is the Stringer situation beyond repair?

  • The club clearly want him out the door.

  • This was just a shot across Jakes bow as a means of motivating him.

  • The club is clearly a rabble. Sack Macca!

  • This is just the first play in massive trade that we are not yet privy to.

  • This is a game of blink and Jake and Conners just blinked.

  • Its time to move on a negotiate the best deal we can.

  • I felt sad for Jake on that stage today.

  • We've warned you about creating polls Norm!

  • The Jack 'Armageddon option' Watts option


Results are only viewable after voting.
Status
Not open for further replies.

(Log in to remove this ad.)

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Golden_6

Premiership Player
Joined
Aug 15, 2014
Posts
3,727
Likes
6,050
AFL Club
Western Bulldogs
Other Teams
Chicago Bulls
What does he do other than look big that defines him as a key forward?
He plays full forward, opposition KPD's play on him, he is the size of a key forward, he takes marks inside 50, he is leading option around the ground, he takes contested marks (little down this year) - I'm seriously trying to figure out your logic on this one.
 

BRWB

Brownlow Medallist
Joined
Oct 7, 2012
Posts
14,786
Likes
21,528
AFL Club
Western Bulldogs
Cause we have limited number of key forwards on our list.

Most teams have at least 4 genuine key forwards on their list. We have 2, one of whom is 31 and could potentially retire this year and the other has had 3 knee recos. We need to be adding more KPF's to our list not cutting them!
Going on that, we should have kept Ayce and Minson because we are short on rucks
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom