Glad to hear this.This is exactly what I heard from within the club. If we had brought in an A grade youngish ruckman then English would 100% leave to go home. He wants to be the #1 ruckman.
It is what we need him to be.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Glad to hear this.This is exactly what I heard from within the club. If we had brought in an A grade youngish ruckman then English would 100% leave to go home. He wants to be the #1 ruckman.
I prefer the eye test to stats.He’s no world beater but he still had 17 touches, 6 clearances, 3 contested marks and 34 hitouts against English & Young’s combined 14 hit outs…
I prefer the eye test to stats.
Just don’t rate this bloke as a quality AFL footballer.
Given the choice, I would take Sweet as no 1 ruck, English as no 2, followed by Martin and then Ceglar. Granted the coach saw it differently this year.
If we are bringing a 4th ruck option on to our list, I want someone youngish with size, talent and upside, not an established, soon to be 31 year old journeyman.
Could accept it last year before we got Martin, but having 2 ruckman on the list north of 30 with limited ability is irresponsible list management.
Very interesting. Ultimately I suspect that’s what the club wants/hopes as well but he’s taking way longer than anyone would have thought.This is exactly what I heard from within the club. If we had brought in an A grade youngish ruckman then English would 100% leave to go home. He wants to be the #1 ruckman.
He’s no world beater but he still had 17 touches, 6 clearances, 3 contested marks and 34 hitouts against English & Young’s combined 14 hit outs…
I'm more than a little disappointed that we didn't land a good, youngish ruckman (excepting perhaps Darcy) but that ship has now sailed.
Rather than endless teeth-gnashing over it, I'm going to look forward to English and Sweet developing into a genuinely good ruck duo. I'm backing them in to get there provided that the match committee selects them and plays them in the appropriate roles so they can develop. I don't want too much short-term thinking and team selection in the ruck...let's get 100% behind Tim and Jordan and leave them both in the team and rucking come hell or high water. Martin to play only to cover injuries or a catastrophic form problem for either Sweet or English.
Reading the Geelong Addy today, Ceglar states he was persuaded all year to come to Geelong by his good mate Isaac Smith.
You keep assuming the club was at fault, maybe he just didn’t want to play for the Dogs.
Been offline for a bit. Any thoughts on our Ruck situation?
Hallelujah brother.I'm more than a little disappointed that we didn't land a good, youngish ruckman (excepting perhaps Darcy) but that ship has now sailed.
Rather than endless teeth-gnashing over it, I'm going to look forward to English and Sweet developing into a genuinely good ruck duo. I'm backing them in to get there provided that the match committee selects them and plays them in the appropriate roles so they can develop. I don't want too much short-term thinking and team selection in the ruck...let's get 100% behind Tim and Jordan and leave them both in the team and rucking come hell or high water. Martin to play only to cover injuries or a catastrophic form problem for either Sweet or English.
Really hope so. If he can make as big of a jump next year as Weightman did this year, that will be huge for usI'd hope Marra (a pick 1!) plays more often than not next year. Kinda negates all the stressing over who covers Bruce
Been offline for a bit. Any thoughts on our Ruck situation?
This is the thing, we all want it to play out well and as I’ve even said here there’s a good chance it does, I mean Timmy and Sweet are at that age they really should be coming adequate at least. But what we’re all complaining about is it’s just a big risk to pin all our hopes on it when we’re sitting in the peak of our window. Even if it does play out that way we’re not necessarily wrong for being disappointed we don’t have more coverage/optionsBecause we were using a barely passable Lewis Young and a post-injuries unfit Stef Martin during that stretch. We didn’t suddenly change English’s role to more ruck time because he was going great guns in there, it was literally only after Martin went down injured and Sweet proved to be not good enough. Even then, we only did it for Rds 14-21 before deciding we were better off using Young in there and moving English back to his forward/ruck role. Was that to replace Bruce? Probably. But that gets to the point - Bruce and Young won’t be there next year, so we’re starting next season already in Plan B.
I really hope English becomes a decent and competitive ruck next year, it would help us enormously. But is he more valuable in there or as a replacement for Bruce? I’d agree with the coaches and say the latter. Maybe JUH and Schache have enormous pre-seasons and become influential and consistent players, or Sweet/Martin stay on the park and overperform and it’s a moot point. I really hope any of those scenarios play out and my fears look misplaced in hindsight.
This is really all that needs to be said. Stats are one thing, hit out stats especially pretty irrelevant on paper but when 3 bottom to middle of the road ruckman are literally getting votes against you, well that’s a big big problem.Opposition rucks (Draper, Ceglar and Lycett) all got coaches votes in all 3 of the rd 21-23 games.
People have short memories if they don't think our ruck stocks are a genuine problem. And yes it hasn't improved.
This is really interesting, I’ve been assuming he’d want a number one ruck in to let him play where he’s played better football (and thus be more important/earn better money). This is great though I’m glad he wants to be the #1 guy, we all know how good he could be if he could even just break even in the actual ruck. But balls in his court it’s not like we haven’t given him opportunity he needs to step up.This is exactly what I heard from within the club. If we had brought in an A grade youngish ruckman then English would 100% leave to go home. He wants to be the #1 ruckman.
if thats the case, i wonder how he felt when Bevo, post the Hawks game, basically played anyone other than him as number 1 ruck. there must be some tension there.This is exactly what I heard from within the club. If we had brought in an A grade youngish ruckman then English would 100% leave to go home. He wants to be the #1 ruckman.
I think in 2020 they realised that the accumulated toll of being the number 1 ruck and doing so for large percentages of game time had a significant affect on Tim's body.if thats the case, i wonder how he felt when Bevo, post the Hawks game, basically played anyone other than him as number 1 ruck. there must be some tension there.
A number 1 ruck doesnt have to be a star, but they must commit their body at all times. English doesnt do that. Bring back Bluey Hampshire
What people keep assuming is that list management is easy, other people are cattle and if that person fills a need in our side then we should ignore their feels and press gang them into the team. You'd think that the Jade Rawlings experience would've dissuaded them of this notion, but its one that rears its ugly red head anytime a potential recruits name gets brought up here. Oh, he fits a need. Just get it done!
Reality says otherwise.
How long does he get to hold down first ruck? Everyone knows ruckman may not come good til late 20s, that doesn’t mean he can sit in the position wasting our prime years whilst he develops. If he fails to step up this year we need to fill the position. If that means he walks to WA to sit behind better ruckman well that’s too badPeople are unironically putting "he's 24" and "last chance" in the same post here
I didn’t know he was third always thought second generation. Who was his grandfather?