Remove this Banner Ad

Strategy Trade and List Management Thread Part 8 (opposition supporters - READ posting rules before posting)

  • Thread starter Thread starter _Mike_
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

We're arguably the only club in the comp that chose not to have a mature back up ruck option.

The first game English missed, we didn't turn to Darcy or Lobb. We threw a kid to the wolves.
I don't think Emmett would have rucked more than Lobb over the course of the season.

In fact, in the Essendon game itself, Lobb went into the ruck before Croft did - we were happy to use Lobb in that situation. It's just that Lobb also went off in the 4th quarter.
 
We're arguably the only club in the comp that chose not to have a mature back up ruck option.

The first game English missed, we didn't turn to Darcy or Lobb. We threw a kid to the wolves.

I've already spoken my thoughts enough over the past two weeks so I'll keep this brief. I can only assume that Sam Power saw Lobb as the English cover and he and Bevo weren't on the same page with it. Probably begs the question though that if you see Lobb as the only English cover (and potentially Darcy cover) and knowing he is a first choice key defender then why wouldn't you recruit a seasoned key defender to cover Lobb. I refuse to believe that he thinks Gardner is the answer to any AFL related questions coming into 2026

I thought the best option ahead of the Hawthorn game was to bring in Busslinger and move Lobb but I could at least understand the gamble knowing that the defense has been working and see if you can get away with two non rucks and try to read the Hawthorn taps. It was quite clear from early on that we couldn't get away with it and the only time we looked decent was when Lobb spent a real extended period in the third quarter rucking and we starting evening up the clearance battle. So the Geelong game I really don't understand. I can't imagine anyone with a sound mind watched that game and could convince themselves that an Emmett/Croft pairing was an option again. Even if Bevo thought it was the best idea, surely the assistants would push back and common sense would prevail
 
I didn't watch the game but Marshall's stats look good from last night. Looks like he split the ruck with DeKoning closer to 50/50
Last night Marshall looked exactly like the ruckman we need to support Tim.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

The thing I saw tonight, and it is something I notice in a lot of games, is how selfish our players can be. The amount of times I see opposition players shepherd in marking contests, when giving the ball, or when allowing a team mate to get the ball is crazy, then we have our team, and I just don't see it. Barring a few players, there is no mongrel, no desire to do the hard things that aren't glamorous because that's what the team needs. Freo did that a lot tonight, particularly over that 7 goal run.
Shepherding is something I wish our players would do more of. I have really noticed that our players will run next to a teammate to get the ball, but don’t even think to shepherd the opposition.
 
Cant remember if we have a 2026 draft thread
I wouldn't be shocked if Dogs bid on Swans or Lions academy players this year
 
Cant remember if we have a 2026 draft thread
I wouldn't be shocked if Dogs bid on Swans or Lions academy players this year
With what though?

Possible Butters trade, El Souki bids, etc.
 
They can attempt to play that role. Being successful at it is a far different thing
Well not really because half of them are playing as undersized key position players. I wouldn't be bringing in any more medium defenders unless we get rid of some of them. We have other holes on our list too and there's only so many list spots.
 
Significant amount of work to be done after this season, have to make up for years of list management malpractice.

Lost too much talent for nothing in return. Not saying Dunkley, Smith and Jamarra leaving is anyone’s fault, but ultimately we didnt get back anything close to what we lost. That kind of talent bleeding alone makes it difficult. Spilt milk now, but the impacts are being felt. You can’t really continually reset your list like this and expect to stay competitive against the sides making more serious moves.

Then there’s our failed attempts to chase key defenders. We knew what the issue was and went for Hail Mary attempts, probably because we know that Bevo would rather throw inadequate players that fit his vision to the wolves, rather than play someone that he was never on board to sign in the first place. And we protected Lobb, JoD and Buku as much as we could until the wheels fell off. The right idea, but even then, we only had to play that way because of how bad that trio is in a vacuum.

Then there’s relying on Emmett and Smith as backup rucks, but once again, what would the point of signing Mason Cox have been? Bevo would never select him. We saw this for years when a young Tim was getting ragdolled every week. He’ll persist with his guys every time. When we flirted with, and decided against, the notion of Crossley last year for a reason.

And we didn’t necessarily have to sign a backup ruck with Lobb and Darcy on the list - but our paper thin depth made moving them into that position so difficult they barely count as ruck depth. Any one injury to Lobb, Darcy or English would have been (and was) to critically disrupt everything we were doing…unfortunately it ended up being all 3.

I do think we should throw whatever it takes at Butters. He’s that good, you don’t say no thanks to that calibre of player because you have needs elsewhere. He’s also a need anyway - our midfield is awfully slow aside from Ed, and looks really shaky without Libba (we shouldn’t be so reliant on Libba with his age and concussion/knee history, but we are).

We had a really solid run with Dalrymple then Sam Power bursting on to the scene with some incredible moves - it’s hard to understate the impact he had when he quickly brought in Treloar, Bruce, Martin, Keath and Duryea. Unfortunately that momentum slowed right down after 2021 and we’ve been very content to be stuck in a perpetual semi-rebuild that keeps us just competitive enough to avoid disaster but not ambitious enough to win even a single final. A couple of decent moves since but not enough to offset what we’ve lost.

It’s been said for the last couple of years really, and hasn’t happened, but when do we get aggressive around trying to get Bont some help?

With the Wilkie attempt we basically just wrung our hands and shrugged the shoulders knowing we were walking into a really perilous situation with our KPD stocks. If the Butters thing flames out and he goes to Geelong I hope it isn’t a repeat. There still so much work to be done on this list, sadly at this point there can’t be much confidence in how the club is approaching our lack of results. Culturally I think a big change within the club is required unless everyone is happy being the Ninthmond of the 2020s.
 
Ran into an old player manager friend at the VFL today.
As I do I tried to get some info out of him!
He said he hasn't heard much on the dogs front except that we are throwing out a few hail Mary's at clubs best Key defenders again, namely Weitering. He also mentioned that Khamis likely leaves a contract decision until around trade period and will likely stay unless we get a top line defender across. Essendon we currently the club most interested in Khamis.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

I've already spoken my thoughts enough over the past two weeks so I'll keep this brief. I can only assume that Sam Power saw Lobb as the English cover and he and Bevo weren't on the same page with it. Probably begs the question though that if you see Lobb as the only English cover (and potentially Darcy cover) and knowing he is a first choice key defender then why wouldn't you recruit a seasoned key defender to cover Lobb. I refuse to believe that he thinks Gardner is the answer to any AFL related questions coming into 2026

I thought the best option ahead of the Hawthorn game was to bring in Busslinger and move Lobb but I could at least understand the gamble knowing that the defense has been working and see if you can get away with two non rucks and try to read the Hawthorn taps. It was quite clear from early on that we couldn't get away with it and the only time we looked decent was when Lobb spent a real extended period in the third quarter rucking and we starting evening up the clearance battle. So the Geelong game I really don't understand. I can't imagine anyone with a sound mind watched that game and could convince themselves that an Emmett/Croft pairing was an option again. Even if Bevo thought it was the best idea, surely the assistants would push back and common sense would prevail
Yep pretty simple stuff, play the key defender we have on the list who is actually decent in Busslinger, when needed.

For some reason were so ****ing scared of playing Busslinger when he’s only ever played decent at afl level, that’d we’d rather ruck Emmett.

It’s just ****ing madness, Bevo is genuinely useless.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom