Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
I tend to agree with that, but I think this St Kilda situation is unique. They’ve signed Nas for 2 years and now are in a spending spree to try and compete in those years. They’re signing players on very inflated contracts.
I think it’s human nature to not feel great about somebody worse than you getting paid more. Wilkie may be fine with it but he hasn’t said no to us yet so that seems unlikely.
It’s an entirely foreseeable outcome that a club could offer Wilkie a contract like this after the JSOS deal.
Did JUH nick them?I heard Butters has already got his boots sitting in the number 2 locker
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
This is how the conversation would’ve gone down between the Saints and Wilkie’s management
I guess they had to get games into Buss to see what he’s capable of. I don’t understand how Gardy got a gig midseason thoughWatching Liam repeatedly out jump the opposition and spoil the ball over the last month in the VFL has had me constantly question what we were doing playing Busslinger in front of him at the pointy end of the season.
Thanks for a great career Liam.
Daisy Thomas did this at Carlton I BelieveI sort of agree.
When it’s the other way around (very often!) and a player is clearly not meeting performance levels commensurate with the size or duration of his contract you almost never see a player saying “I’m taking money on fraudulent pretences. Here, take some back.” (A salute to Tom Boyd here but different circumstances.) So that could be used as the yardstick for Wilkie too.
However, if the club is really committed to keeping the player you simply have to recognise you need to top up. Even if it’s only going part of the way to matching the competing offers. It’s party about money and partly about feeling valued. Gestures are important.
With Wilkie, I think we need to move on reasonably quickly and put a timeline on it. I'd give him until the end of the month to make a decision which means he's had a good 2-3 weeks to think about it already.
We can't be waiting through trade period only for him to get a better offer from the Saints and back out. With Jones & Buku gone, it's clear we need to bring in another KPD (Butts etc.) and we can't miss out because we were waiting on the unlikely outcome.
With Wilkie, I think we need to move on reasonably quickly and put a timeline on it. I'd give him until the end of the month to make a decision which means he's had a good 2-3 weeks to think about it already.
We can't be waiting through trade period only for him to get a better offer from the Saints and back out. With Jones & Buku gone, it's clear we need to bring in another KPD (Butts etc.) and we can't miss out because we were waiting on the unlikely outcome.
Doesn't seem like we are thoughWe can work on two deals on that same time. I don’t think this should be a concern.
Doesn't seem like we are though
Let's hope soThe journos don’t know everything. I’m sure there’s a lot happening in the background we don’t know about.
With Wilkie, I think we need to move on reasonably quickly and put a timeline on it. I'd give him until the end of the month to make a decision which means he's had a good 2-3 weeks to think about it already.
We can't be waiting through trade period only for him to get a better offer from the Saints and back out. With Jones & Buku gone, it's clear we need to bring in another KPD (Butts etc.) and we can't miss out because we were waiting on the unlikely outcome.
I agree in theory but disagree somewhat in the execution. A decision from Wilkie is in some ways the easy part - actually getting the deal done is the hard part, and regardless of how open the Saints end up being, that's 100% going until the final minutes of trade period.Yep. Deal is off end of next week. Move to Butts. Can’t lose Butts to North.
Apparently Saints haven't revised Wilkie's contract which would end this in a heart beat. Maybe the war chest is used up?Gettable~
Dogs the favourite to land Budarick.
Will Darcy will go pick 30-50.
Dogs are growing more optimistic to land Wilkie the longer it goes on.
Dogs will try to get Gold Coast’s pick 6 either to satisfy a Wilkie trade or draft.
Even though he crashed and burned i'm not completely upset with Gardner getting an AFL game mid season.I guess they had to get games into Buss to see what he’s capable of. I don’t understand how Gardy got a gig midseason though
when you spend 3.7 mill on 2 players that happens. Let alone the 800k+ on C GradersApparently Saints haven't revised Wilkie's contract which would end this in a heart beat. Maybe the war chest is used up?
Wow saints really aren’t showing Wilkie any love
No current season stats available
If what i am hearing is to be believed which i think it is and i have certainly been hearing it for weeks, Butters is close to making a request for a trade to dogs. Its not a surprise though, as i think its growing like wild fire.
Dogs want to bring Wilkie and Butters both in this trade period. I'd say Wilkie is more a long shot though.
Haven't heard anything regarding Butts.
I don't know if its been posted anywhere but congratulations to Taylor Duryea, he is joining Luke Bruest at the Tigers as developement coaches.