Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
That's because they have no choiceAFL media saying Dogs are happy to back Buss and JOD if they can't get a key defender
This was put bed some time ago it was only the bigfooty bulldog dreamers thinking we could get him this trade period.SA media just in reporting Butters has committed to Port for next year
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Collingwood are next to no chance, neither are the Dawks.This was put bed some time ago it was only the bigfooty bulldog dreamers thinking we could get him this trade period.
He is coming back to Victoria next season so that is a one in ten chance.
You can rule the saints out no salary space. You would think his order would be a team in the flag window, $ in the contract, length of contract, senior coach, senior players, facilities, opportunity to play in big games and maybe some loyalty to the dogs the team he supported as a kid.
If premiership window is one of the main priorities you would think that rules out the tigers, bombers, roos, blues and dees.
That would leave the cats, pies, hawks and dogs. Hope we can get him over the line but it will tough.
Collingwood are next to no chance, neither are the Dawks.
Geelong will struggle with currency if they get Curnow and I'm fairly confident he prefers the dogs anyway.
Geelong can't offer Cotton on deals without the AFL being all over it
Well, who out there is available and going to make us better?AFL media saying Dogs are happy to back Buss and JOD if they can't get a key defender
If they got Curnow and Butters it would raise alarm bells considering the competition would be jumping up and downAFL will never be all over Geelong, looking the other way is in both their and Geelong’s interest
Funny how the mindset changes when it's a big club being offered shit picksGeelong offer is insulting. Pick 20ish 23ish and 30ish probably. They dreaming
Baz was oocFunny how the mindset changes when it's a big club being offered shit picks
While we had every media person saying take the deal
Both out of contract and a belligerent ****wit who’s management (by speculation) was making it clear there’d be consequences for any other club who picked him up in the draft before Geelong, or even threatened to do so. The moment that happened the definition of a “fair price” completely changed.Baz was ooc
Careful with Keane. He may have had a good season this year but we have to remember that he is a proven flight risk.I’ve heard it’s actually more Sanders/Keane
Exactly! the media played a massive role in making sure the deal was done, and we wouldn't get a fair tradeBoth out of contract and a belligerent ****wit who’s management (by speculation) was making it clear there’d be consequences for any other club who picked him up in the draft before Geelong, or even threatened to do so. The moment that happened the definition of a “fair price” completely changed.
Isn't that what we did with Luke Goetz? Or whatever his name was.So you can write a contract that says essentially if a player doesnt behave like a professional footballer it can be terminated?
um, why wouldnt all contracts already say that?
Why do they get to do it and we dont?
I'd be keen if it costs a fourth rounder and we pay him 300k not the 850k the Saints were offering.I’d be keen if it costs a second rounder.
Never said I wasn't part of the problem.
Big difference between pick #83 unheard-of Luke Goetz and pick #1 star junior indigenous kid and one of the showpieces of the AFL’s NGA program.Isn't that what we did with Luke Goetz? Or whatever his name was.
Why offer anything?I'd be keen if it costs a fourth rounder and we pay him 300k not the 850k the Saints were offering.
We also paid out Goetz's salary, it was only half of one year of literally a minimum amount ($50k or whatever it was outstanding).Isn't that what we did with Luke Goetz? Or whatever his name was.
Can you explain how as I understood it to be exactly the same as the poster you responded to? Surely what we want is the cap room back, not just the dollars in the bank account (which I don’t think actually happens).Just wrong plain wrong