List Mgmt. Trade & Draft UltraThread- Warning, May Contain Speculation #combinethethreads

[Spange]

Caller points out media hypocrisy r.e Tim Kelly choosing a club compared to Dangerfield selecting a club.

Four eyes Barrett immediately shuts it down as a conspiracy.

Enough said.

what did he say exactly?

 

[Chris_6678]

Haze surprisingly goes in to bat for Eagles more than one would think

Has a soft spot for them. Can’t stand Langdon who try’s not to be biased to WC and comes across odd. Haze on the other hand does it well.

 

[Quinz]

I agree Damien. Odd that it takes a famous Victorian name leaving the state to get that point made. Someone call up on the Papley/Hill deals and remind him.

 

[henry27]

possible pick swap proposed on trade radio in order to get the pick(s) for Kelly.Thoughts?

 

[FKASC]

View attachment 757112
possible pick swap proposed on trade radio in order to get the pick(s) for Kelly.Thoughts?

This was posted in the other thread that is also dedicated to Tim Kelly hypotheticals

List Mgmt. - The Kelly and All Draft and Trades Discussion Thread- #freetim #ITSHAPPENING

The West Australian coming right out and supporting Fremantle as the destination for Kelly. You mean The Freo-est Australian? Typical Dockers media machine. :rolleyes:

www.bigfooty.com

if the mods just combined the threads we wouldn’t get this sort of duplication

#combinethethreads

 

[Scotland]

If Carlton are OK with that pick swap then fine.

Geelong wanted a top 10 pick, there's a top 10 pick.

 

[Yamumluvsbigcox]

View attachment 757112
possible pick swap proposed on trade radio in order to get the pick(s) for Kelly.Thoughts?

Geelong dont have pick 69 its 73 .

That trade helps out carlton more than us

69 or 73 are usless picks we do not need . This year around the team with the lower picks have the power .

I still think we can get kelly + future 2nd
for 14 + future 1st .

Works out about pick 5

 

[Miguel Sanchez]

Geelong dont have pick 69 its 73 .

That trade helps out carlton more than us

69 or 73 are usless picks we do not need . This year around the team with the lower picks have the power .

I still think we can get kelly + future 2nd
for 14 + future 1st .

Works out about pick 5

Turn 69/73 or whatever it is into a future fourth. We’re not going to be picking that late in this year’s draft anyway. There’s a chance we only take two live picks and upgrade Watson.

 

[Yamumluvsbigcox]

Turn 69/73 or whatever it is into a future fourth. We’re not going to be picking that late in this year’s draft anyway. There’s a chance we only take two live picks and upgrade Watson.

I proposed a different trade on the other board where we get 9 41 and 46 .

This having 2 trade threads is annoying and stupid

 

[ChampRevesby]

Props to all the people listening to Trade Radio, why you would listen to that garbage is beyond me.

 

[Capriati]

It's on fellas.

 

[Biggie]

It's on fellas.

 

[Quinz]

Alright then, I’m shutting this thread down as you low EQ plebs can’t seem to keep a Kelly thread and a Non Kelly thread working as intended.