- Sep 13, 2013
- 31,411
- 28,204
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
- Other Teams
- Juventus
No it’s nothis forward type is completely out of the game.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No it’s nothis forward type is completely out of the game.
Rule change favours real ruckmen.He is a premiership ruckman though.
Angry much?
Not really, but he can compete. If he was good ruck depth, he wouldn't come to the Pies, he'd look to be a first ruck somewhere. A better defender than ruckman. I reckon he'll be good depth for us and could be better than that as a defender.I don't mind recruiting for depth if it's ruck depth. But is Roughead actually any good in there?
How do we feel about Jordan Roughead?
You're a fool. You call people Fonzie's and you are the biggest one of all. So yes, at you, I am angry.
I don’t think he’s done anything wrong yet, he hasn’t threatened to sit out for a year has he?A question.
Say T Kelly really wants to go to WA, break a contract, family stuff
But then baulk at a WA club?
Hmmmm.
(ps freo look dreadful currently so it does make sense that way)
and one way or another beams will come back to the pies even if his 30 at the end of his contract
You're a fool. You call people Fonzie's and you are the biggest one of all. So yes, at you, I am angry.
I call sr36 Fonzie and guess what he has a sense of humour about it.
You my friend take life and bigfooty too seriously.
View attachment 573104
No nne of that.I don’t think he’s done anything wrong yet, he hasn’t threatened to sit out for a year has he?
I call sr36 Fonzie and guess what he has a sense of humour about it.
You my friend take life and bigfooty too seriously.
View attachment 573104
Could play on a Lynch type and that's the kind of defender we have lacked.Not really, but he can compete. If he was good ruck depth, he wouldn't come to the Pies, he'd look to be a first ruck somewhere. A better defender than ruckman. I reckon he'll be good depth for us and could be better than that as a defender.
i highly doubt brisbane will come to play given how much we won out of the trade, Dagoey, Crisp and Greenwood. if*** we can get Scully for a 2nd round pick and the make a play for beams next year i'd do itI'd love to have Beams back. He's one of the best 25 mids in the game. He'd be a big help. It's just it needs to be at the right price.
Now that Freo have offered him a spot on their list, and a fair trade.
The AFL can no longer step in and push Geelong to trade him to West Coast because of family reasons.
He has a clear path to a move home if he wants it.
Roughhead was a key player in their finals run of 2016. McClarty has does nothing to suggest he would be ahead of Roughhead when it comes to selection or talent.If I was McLarty I'd be a little disappointed with the Roughead announcement.
I would have thought his development across his first two seasons in the VFL has been geared towards being that player who can potentially fill a role at full back, full forward or in the ruck.
I would have been happy to just see him given senior opportunity if it presented or his form couldn't be ignored.
Roughead improves our key position depth which was required but doesn't improve on our first choice options in the roles he plays so I hope we can now secure a player like a Beams who'll definitely improve the midfield mix to what we witnessed in 2018.
i highly doubt brisbane will come to play given how much we won out of the trade, Dagoey, Crisp and Greenwood. if*** we can get Scully for a 2nd round pick and the make a play for beams next year i'd do it
Good, not gonna cost anything and will be a handy depth playerHow do we feel about Jordan Roughead?
If you want people to take you seriously you shouldn't post stuff like Garlett is best 22 at 18 clubs.
certainly does make you think that something is up, aka May, Beams or Scully. just on Beams though given it was so public you think that if the club had ZERO interest they would have made a statementDon’t mind your thinking. As much as it’s frustrating and I know it’s been mentioned already but it’s pretty impressive how tight lipped the club is atm.
certainly does make you think that something is up, aka May, Beams or Scully. just on Beams though given it was so public you think that if the club had ZERO interest they would have made a statement
Hahahaahhahahaha.I don't use the term elite to describe Garlett. I'll use very good to describe Garlett and Champion Data's analysis of pressure acts, tackles and turnovers caused all are by position very good or better over a series of years.
And that's before the heavy scoreboard he offers by position which also is very good.
If I'm selecting a team to win today. Garlett is a best 22 player on any list in the competition.