TradeDraft
Premium Platinum
Do you think we'll keep Daicos?
I say we give him a 1 year extension
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: Richmond v Melbourne - 7:25PM Wed
Squiggle tips Demons at 77% chance -- What's your tip? -- Team line-ups »
Do you think we'll keep Daicos?
Do you think we'll keep Daicos?
Still baffled that a Tasmanian team wasn’t prioritised over the Gold Coast, even GWS. Personally I’d like the AFL to make Tassie, ACT and NT teams a long term goal now instead of talking about reduced seasons. 21 teams playing each other once solves most of the inequity in the draw and makes the comp truly National.I think that will happen (but not for 4-5 years).
If they don’t get off the floor with the latest assistance package, then the Tasmanian Devils (the Tasmanian Overcasters or Wind Chillers probably wouldn’t catch on) will become a reality.
That’s a bit harsh, Dave.. lolI say we give him a 1 year Extinction
Sounds a bit nasty...I say we give him a 1 year Extinction
We need less teams not more. The talent pool is not deep enough to support 21 sides.Still baffled that a Tasmanian team wasn’t prioritised over the Gold Coast, even GWS. Personally I’d like the AFL to make Tassie, ACT and NT teams a long term goal now instead of talking about reduced seasons. 21 teams playing each other once solves most of the inequity in the draw and makes the comp truly National.
Excellent. The Bundoora taggers will have no hope. Big finals game for Steele coming up.I heard we’re trading him and Steele for Borthwick.
Watch this space
Sounds a bit nasty...
(couldn't resist - spelling of extension, Dave)
Wont happen till they piss off Hawks and Norf from playing games in Tas.Still baffled that a Tasmanian team wasn’t prioritised over the Gold Coast, even GWS. Personally I’d like the AFL to make Tassie, ACT and NT teams a long term goal now instead of talking about reduced seasons. 21 teams playing each other once solves most of the inequity in the draw and makes the comp truly National.
Fair point but our population will continue growing so long term I think it’s viable.We need less teams not more. The talent pool is not deep enough to support 21 sides.
We have too many Victorian sides.
Bulldogs, North, St Kilda and Melbourne should all be relocated.
North should have gone years ago. Dogs too.Fair point but our population will continue growing so long term I think it’s viable.
Not a fan of relocation I guess. What criteria do we use to choose those teams to be relocated? Would hate it if it was us.
The “market” is a brainless, heartless non- entitity as far as I’m concerned Jmac, always distorted by subsidies and regulations anyway.North should have gone years ago. Dogs too.
The AFL should stop propping up sides, let the market decide.
We need less teams not more. The talent pool is not deep enough to support 21 sides.
We have too many Victorian sides.
Bulldogs, North, St Kilda and Melbourne should all be relocated.
Gold Coast got $23 million from the AFL last year.The “market” is a brainless, heartless non- entitity as far as I’m concerned Jmac, always distorted by subsidies and regulations anyway.
I know one. He follows the Bears now.Obviously you don’t know many Fitzroy supporters.
Are you sure he is contracted for next year, fairly sure he uncontracted for next year but I could be wrongContracted for next year, he needs to be playing senior footy to be kept on after that imo
I know one. He follows the Bears now.
Bloody small population that is split between two parochial cities that will struggle to barrack for a team stationed in the other city.Still baffled that a Tasmanian team wasn’t prioritised over the Gold Coast, even GWS. Personally I’d like the AFL to make Tassie, ACT and NT teams a long term goal now instead of talking about reduced seasons. 21 teams playing each other once solves most of the inequity in the draw and makes the comp truly National.
Forgive me jmac but I know the kennel well and you couldn't be any more wrong in their case.North should have gone years ago. Dogs too.
The AFL should stop propping up sides, let the market decide.
He’s a Ballarat potato farmer with hands like dinner plates. I would want to say that to him.The “real ones” don’t barrack for that team.
I live in Footscray and am glad they survived.Forgive me jmac but I know the kennel well and you couldn't be any more wrong in their case.
I did regular deliveries to the kennel supporters shop and I can tell you that despite the AFL cutting all funds off and attempting to kill their club the supporters and volounteers refused to let the club die.
They worked tirelessly for years raising money in any way they could think of to stave off relocation or merger.
THEY propped themselves up and THEY made themselves solvent again.
From my inside experience the Footscray football club are a shining example of what a community centred club should should be all about.
He’s a Ballarat potato farmer with hands like dinner plates. I would want to say that to him.
Merged with which team?Like I said you don’t know any real ones?
If Collingwood merged would you follow that team?
I don’t know. My guess would be that the AFL sees a long term market up there and sees us with 80,000 members and the resources to have a netball and AFLW team as being somewhat self sufficient. Makes a mockery of the salary cap etc. but probably illustrates my point that markets are always distorted by concessions and choices such as these.Gold Coast got $23 million from the AFL last year.
We got $11 million, the lowest of any club.
Why?
Merged with which team?