Defacto
Brownlow Medallist
- Joined
- Sep 21, 2008
- Posts
- 22,930
- Reaction score
- 17,129
- AFL Club
- St Kilda
apparently patton knocked back a 5m 5 year deal from the doggies. he's no chance of going there IMO
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Log in to remove this Banner Ad
He's not a free agent & isn't it only against the rules if he signs something?Would that not be a breach of the rules?
No way would your first be to much if anything I would say its unders.I'm guessing WCE want Lowden?
Port would give up a 2nd rounder for Lycett but the problem is it might be slight unders. (1st rounder is too much)
If we trade Butcher to the Bulldogs for a 2nd or 3rd rounder it might give us something to work with.
What would you want for gibbs.He's not a free agent & isn't it only against the rules if he signs something?
Adelaide did the same with Eddie Betts @ the end of 2012 (a full year before he became a FA). Teams do it all the time.
Sydney to get James Frawley to replace the aging Richards and Grundy in free agency.
Sydney to trade Mitchell to Melbourne for pick 3 and Reid to Bulldogs for pick 6 and Jetta to Freo for pick 17.
swans will get the player they want, salary cap relief, 3 first round picks to go with Isaac Heeney.
What would you want for gibbs.
Nothing. Gibbs is untouchableWhat would you want for gibbs.

I rate him in the mid 20'sNo way would your first be to much if anything I would say its unders.
wingard will doI rate him in the mid 20's
If Port miss the top 4 we could end up with something like pick 13 (Essendon have no 1st rounder so we go up another spot)
Obviously our second (early 30's) would be unders but If Port find a way to get an early 20's pick I'm sure that would be good enough.
Would that not be a breach of the rules?
apparently wce are inquiring about some rucks at hawthorn
makes me think lycett looks like going. what would port/crows give up for him?
Port will give their first rounder possibly with a swap of later picks back in their favour.
Why in the heck would WC go for another ruck even if Lycett goes anyway, they still have Nat and Sinclair, plus a very tall forward line, they need midfielders.
Why ? I see them having a pretty damn good midfield and all they need is a power forward like Patton to be very competitive . Funny you say that because I see them have success before the tigersNo one wants to go to the dogs, it's the harsh but true reality.
Why ? I see them having a pretty damn good midfield and all they need is a power forward like Patton to be very competitive . Funny you say that because I see them have success before the tigers
Players aren't wanna go to the dogs when they can go to big clubs or clubs near the top of the ladder.
They are still a long way off just like we are.

Why wouldn't players go to the Dogs when they've got Libba, Macrae, Dahlhaus, Bontempelli, Stringer etc all coming through.
Believe it or not, players might actually be excited by the up and coming players at the Dogs? Impossible I know![]()
Mate it's just my opinion.
No one wants to go to the dogs, it's the harsh but true reality.
Right...
How would you know? How can such a thing be an opinion?It is my opinion that no one wants to go to to the dogs?