Remove this Banner Ad

Trade hypotheticals

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Would have to be two first round picks for Beams.

At least...and even then would Collingwood do it? The chances of getting another Beams in the draft are slim to none.
 
be closer to
danger > collingwood
beams> brisbane
aish + something to crows, just cant work out the something

Danger?

Maybe Dangerfield to Collingwood.
Beams and 9 to Brisbane.
Aish, Kennedy, 4 and 22 to Adelaide.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Would have to be two first round picks for Beams.

Well, Danger is a top five mid and Beams is a top 20 mid. That's why this would be tough to do.

Depends if Beams wants to go to Brisbane.
 
Danger?

Maybe Dangerfield to Collingwood.
Beams and 9 to Brisbane.
Aish, Kennedy, 4 and 22 to Adelaide.

Why are you so hell bent on getting rid of Dangerfield. Collingwood won't do that anyway, and why the heck are Adelaide getting Aish and pick 4!
 
Well, Danger is a top five mid and Beams is a top 20 mid. That's why this would be tough to do.

Depends if Beams wants to go to Brisbane.

LOL...Beams is better than Dangerfield, at least the last two seasons. All Australian. At worst they are equal, and Danger is nowhere near the top 5 mids, he MIGHT be in the top 10, might.
 
This guy can see the future :O

To a degree he is right, will take him probably 2 years to play okay football, he is still young and needs some bulk in his frame. That said 4 years is pushing it, 2-3 is more the mark. However that is why you have bought White for!
 
Danger?

Maybe Dangerfield to Collingwood.
Beams and 9 to Brisbane.
Aish, Kennedy, 4 and 22 to Adelaide.
Your trades are really confusing. So at the end of the day, you get Aish pick 4, Ben Kennedy and pick 22 for danger field? That's 3 and a half first rounders
 
E="Prochard123, post: 34873942, member: 155123"]This guy can see the future :O[/QUOTE]

Ben Reid took 4 years and they look very similar in build and ability.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Your trades are really confusing. So at the end of the day, you get Aish pick 4, Ben Kennedy and pick 22 for danger field? That's 3 and a half first rounders

Exactly! I thought I was the only one...my goodness. Danger is good, he aint Ablett good! Even Ablett didn't get that much.
 
De Boer - leadership group, tough as nails, has played a defensive forward role in his time at Freo, yet in the odd occaision when thrown into the middle has shown he can be a very good inside mid (got 28 poss incl 20 contested, 12 clearances, 8 tackles in one game from memory vs Richmond at the G when played as a mid). Great endurance. Leader on and off the field. 35 poss on the weekend for Peel.

I'd have De Boer if the cost wasn't too dear. And by too dear basically the only things we have to offer are Hardingham, Jetta, Pears and/or a pick that's going to end up on the wrong side of 50.

Potentially Howlett but it seems like a redundant type of deal because they're a bit similar, unless they're both dead keen on a move back to their respective home states
 
That Saints 'midfield' is going for back to back spoons. You need some quality in there. Now does that mean from Freo, maybe not, but you need some more depth.

dont get me wrong, i'm all for trading in quality mids below the age of 24. but suban, pearce and de boer are not those players. c graders at best.

i could name a handfull running around in the VFL/WAFL that i would play before them
 
LOL...Beams is better than Dangerfield, at least the last two seasons. All Australian. At worst they are equal, and Danger is nowhere near the top 5 mids, he MIGHT be in the top 10, might.

agree with you, but crows supporters think danger is the number 1 in the comp, they don't realise beams is his equal or better
 
Danger?

Maybe Dangerfield to Collingwood.
Beams and 9 to Brisbane.
Aish, Kennedy, 4 and 22 to Adelaide.
Wait, Collingwood lose Beams AND Kennedy for only Dangerfield? Surely kidding.

Ive seen your earlier trades, none work.
Well, Danger is a top five mid and Beams is a top 20 mid. That's why this would be tough to do.

Depends if Beams wants to go to Brisbane.
Is Dangerfield still considered better than Beams? Thought Beams went past him after playing better games more consistently.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

I'd have De Boer if the cost wasn't too dear. And by too dear basically the only things we have to offer are Hardingham, Jetta, Pears and/or a pick that's going to end up on the wrong side of 50.

Potentially Howlett but it seems like a redundant type of deal because they're a bit similar, unless they're both dead keen on a move back to their respective home states
Straight swap De Boer for Tayte Pears?
 
Montagna has said he wants out of the club... so scratch him.

lol no he hasnt

same thing has been said since 2008. he's yet to leave

if he did leave meh, we'll find another mid and those three you mentioned wouldnt even get close to being on the saints list
 
agree with you, but crows supporters think danger is the number 1 in the comp, they don't realise beams is his equal or better

Love to see how they think he is better than Watson, Ablett, Pendles, JPK, Beams, Fyfe, Barlow, etc. He might squeez into the 10, but a guy who might squeeze into the 10 isn't worth 3 first rounders!
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom