At GWS?Says he wants to play with his brother
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
At GWS?Says he wants to play with his brother
Not gonna happen mate , swans won’t let go of Hayward on his own let alone with a bonus for us so it’s a mute point
By time Hayward is 25 I predict he will be on similar coin , time will tell but he’s got 4-5 years
Probably an arm and a legWhat would Harrison Himmelburg cost?
What would Harrison Himmelburg cost?
We aren’t getting HH
Can he play midfield?Not with that attitude we won't
A 3 way deal that sees us lose Gov and get HH with some pick swaps between various teams might be realisticDepends how bad the cap squeeze is at the Giants. Who knows, the Melbourne pick could be enough if it's that tight.
More chance of getting HHHWe aren’t getting HH
* mootNot gonna happen mate , swans won’t let go of Hayward on his own let alone with a bonus for us so it’s a mute point
By time Hayward is 25 I predict he will be on similar coin , time will tell but he’s got 4-5 years
Dare to DreamThere is as much chance we get Himmelberg or Hayward as there is Carlton getting 15 first team players while retaining pick 1. None.
So, going by the Carlton board, we have a pretty good chance.There is as much chance we get Himmelberg or Hayward as there is Carlton getting 15 first team players while retaining pick 1. None.
* moot
750k per year. We could easily afford that if we made some hard decisions on players such as douglas, mackay , kelly, hartigan, jacobs for once in our existence. Unlikely gws will give him up as i feel he is close to their best player.Probably an arm and a leg
The salary of Himmelberg is irrelevant. They're not trading him.750k. We could easily afford that if we made some hard decisions on players such as douglas, mackay , kelly, hartigan, jacobs for once in our existence. Unlikely gws will give him up as i feel he is close to their best player.
I bloody rate Himmelberg but he isn’t their best player, Coniglio/Kelly/Whitfield for starters are definitely better750k. We could easily afford that if we made some hard decisions on players such as douglas, mackay , kelly, hartigan, jacobs for once in our existence. Unlikely gws will give him up as i feel he is close to their best player.
I strongly rate himmers. He is structurally critical to their forward line. Would love to see the brothers running around together. Would be a massive upgrade on the injury prone gov.I bloody rate Himmelberg but he isn’t their best player, Coniglio/Kelly/Whitfield for starters are definitely better
Himmelberg is a seriously good forward. We would be ahead in a straight swap for Gov imo.I bloody rate Himmelberg but he isn’t their best player, Coniglio/Kelly/Whitfield for starters are definitely better
Theres a reason we wanted Harry in the draft a few years ago. The kid is class, hes basically Gov with a better kick.Himmelberg is a seriously good forward. We would be ahead in a straight swap for Gov imo.
Where on earth we are playing all of Walker, Lynch, Jenkins, Fog, Himmelberg #1 and Himmelberg #2'.... Well Idk.
I agree with Rabbit, GWS would be smarter to offload Patton for a late 2nd and retain Himmelberg.
To answer your question we play our best team and dont find spots for players solely based on games played or contract size. Easy. I would love our forwars line to be:Himmelberg is a seriously good forward. We would be ahead in a straight swap for Gov imo.
Where on earth we are playing all of Walker, Lynch, Jenkins, Fog, Himmelberg #1 and Himmelberg #2'.... Well Idk.
I agree with Rabbit, GWS would be smarter to offload Patton for a late 2nd and retain Himmelberg.