Spangher + pick 86 for pick 85. Do it
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
They may aswell traded him for nothing.http://www.kangaroos.com.au/latestnews/newsarticle/tabid/4912/newsid/103928/default.aspx
Pick 86
Looks like a charity deal with no one showing interest
We are all aware of the North boards running joke re: this arn't we?![]()
They may aswell traded him for nothing.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Now McKinley knows what it feels like to take the ugliest looking girl in the school to prom. Pick 86.
Daniel Kerrs used kleenexes have more value than McKinley
So is the equation now:
we have to delist Bones and/or Hansen
to upgrade Stevenson and/or use pick 45 and/or PSD pick?
1520: BREAKING NEWS: We have news on the compensation picks from the AFL - Brisbane Lions will receive an end of first round pick for Jared Brennan, Collingwood will receive a third-round pick for Josh Fraser.
so brennan was worth 2 first rounders one top ten. excuse me how is he rated so highly
So is the equation now:
we have to delist Bones and/or Hansen
to upgrade Stevenson and/or use pick 45 and/or PSD pick?
I'd think Nicoski is more likely to get chopped than Bones but that's basically right, yeah.
it's just annoying how time/development we wasted on him...then he just leaves for nothing.
not sure what's going on with recruiters...since when were hale and tambling much much much more valuable than mckinley?
i'd probably have them on par for value.
Thanks.
With a bit of luck we delist Nicoski and Hansen for Stevenson and 45. And if there is someone suitable lined up for the PSD pick chop Bones as well.
it's just annoying how time/development we wasted on him...then he just leaves for nothing.
not sure what's going on with recruiters...since when were hale and tambling much much much more valuable than mckinley?
i'd probably have them on par for value.
Spangher + pick 86 for Brisbane's pick 5
C'monnn Vossy, you know you want to.
I think you are dreaming if you think McKinley is more valuable. Tambling better midfielder and Hale can play ruck and forward. at 185cm, mckinley is not tall enough for key position and isnt good enough to play in midfield.it's just annoying how time/development we wasted on him...then he just leaves for nothing.
not sure what's going on with recruiters...since when were hale and tambling much much much more valuable than mckinley?
i'd probably have them on par for value.