Trades that hurt your club

dazbroncos

Max Rooke Appreciation Society
Joined
Oct 9, 2010
Posts
32,651
Likes
48,087
Location
Los Angeles and Melbourne
AFL Club
Geelong
Other Teams
Denver Broncos, Red Bull Racing
Moderator #76
Didn't really hurt the hawks (we won 5 flags after this), but, ablett to Geelong for a (rumoured) yrs supply of oranges...
It didnt hurt I agree.... but can you imagine how ridiculous those Hawks teams would have been with GAS at CHF or FF.

Those teams were epic in their talent level already but adding him would have made you entirely untouchable....

Go Catters
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

scarecrow2k1

Norm Smith Medallist
Joined
May 19, 2004
Posts
5,536
Likes
3,479
Location
Melbourne
AFL Club
Richmond
#79
Any trade that is for instant success over future stability invariably isn't worth it.

When we traded Pick 4 for Kane Johnson- it hurt our club. Whilst Johnson was important to the club and added leadership, he retired years ago. Pick 4 Became Pick 2 which was Daniel Wells- who is still running around and doing well. Even at 4 we could have got someone like Jared Brennan or Jarrad McVeigh

This is another reason I think the Pies stuffed up in essentially letting Dawes go for Quentin Lynch. Nothing to do with performance this year, but Dawes is a young key position player, and in a few years time they'll regret this.

Another is letting Ottens go for what we got. Although we got picks 12 and 16, we allegedly knocked back Moloney and Corey Enright- crazy when you consider we drafted Danny Meyer and Adam Pattinson and both lasted just years on our list.
 

JackFlash

Norm Smith Medallist
Joined
Jul 28, 2012
Posts
7,203
Likes
5,819
Location
Docklands
AFL Club
Geelong
Other Teams
QPR, Buffalo Bills, Melbourne Stars
#80
Not a trade so much but letting Greg Williams go to Sydney wasn't very clever by Geelong in the 80's. Just because he asked for a bit more money. If they had of paid him the $40,000 he wanted he'd have stayed at the Cats and could have possibly turned some of those premiership losses into wins.

Trading Mumford has bitten us a bit as since Ottens retired we haven't really had a match winning ruckman. We just didn't have room in our cap to offer him a contract like Sydney did so we had to let him go. They gave Blake a contract that year too and that left only a small amount of money for Mumford. At the time I think they felt they had to repay Blake for the service he had put in as Ottens no 2, and carrying the ruck all those games Ottens was injured.

The interchange sub rule eventually led to the extinction of ruckmen like Blake, and Geelong got caught out having put their eggs in that basket. Mumford would have slotted in nicely as our no 1 ruckman after Ottens retired. But it was never to be and now we still struggle with that position.
Agree with you about Williams, he never wanted to leave Geelong! His hand was forced when Billy Goggin refused to budge over a lousy $5000 extra, it set Geelong back years and if Williams had been a Geelong player in 1989 the Cats would've won the flag that year! (see Sheahan open mike interview, he asks Williams would Geelong have won in 89 if you were playing? he dryly answers back "yep") The Cats were lucky that Couch, Hocking and Bairstow all arrived at the same time, it's mind boggling to think that you could've had Greg Williams on that list too. Ablett might very well have kicked 150 goals in a season. The Mumford loss was unavoidable at the time, the Swans offer was too good to be true for Mumford, you can't blame him for taking the deal. Geelong picked up Mitch Duncan with pick 28 so that eases the pain a little. The Cats also didn't get compensated enough for the loss of Ablett jr. Nothing short of the number 1 draft pick should've been given to the Cats for losing arguably the best player of past 50 years! Other than that, not many trades have come back to bite them on the arse, the Sean Denham/John Barnes deal was good for both clubs for example.
 

bradrowe#32

Brownlow Medallist
Joined
Oct 5, 2004
Posts
14,125
Likes
6,856
Location
Perth
AFL Club
Collingwood
Other Teams
Rochester FC, Waroona FC, Pacers
#81
I get what you are saying about what could have been but I seriously doubt HT was on anyone else's draft radar in round 1. HT was a Wells special and mature age before the mature age thing got popular.. and we got all kinds of looks like WTF when he was taken...

GO Catters
Agree. From memory Geelong had just lost Egan and were keen for a ready made replacement, which was Taylor. No guarantees we would've drafted him or anyone else that was decent.
 

W.C. Fry

Norm Smith Medallist
Joined
Apr 10, 2004
Posts
6,031
Likes
6,294
Location
perth
AFL Club
West Coast
Other Teams
49ers, Liverpool
#82
Fraser Gehrig leaving hurt us a little - but we did get Kerr with the draft pick so it wasn't that horrible.
Judd leaving hurt our ego more than anything else. Our flag chances were done before he left. Wouldn't trade him back for Kennedy - let alone Masten too.
Brad Ebert is probably the worst one really. Him for pick #28. Port screwed us. Hurts now because he is playing great footy and can really see that he left a hole in our midfield.
 

bradrowe#32

Brownlow Medallist
Joined
Oct 5, 2004
Posts
14,125
Likes
6,856
Location
Perth
AFL Club
Collingwood
Other Teams
Rochester FC, Waroona FC, Pacers
#83
This is another reason I think the Pies stuffed up in essentially letting Dawes go for Quentin Lynch. Nothing to do with performance this year, but Dawes is a young key position player, and in a few years time they'll regret this.
Fair point. Hopefully Jackson Paine or potential f/s Darcy Moore can become good KPFs.
 

Wee Jessies

All Australian
Joined
Oct 7, 2009
Posts
741
Likes
354
AFL Club
Fremantle
#84
Some posters going off tangent a bit. The thread is about trades that pushed your club back not bad trades in isolation.

The Croad trade is the worst one for Freo, could have drafted Hodge or Judd which would have been handy in our 2006 Prelim. Freo fans justify the trade as we got Luke McPharlin, but pick 4 would have got Luke and change or even PSD as he was heading home anyway.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Superstar swan

Brownlow Medallist
Joined
Jun 16, 2012
Posts
18,494
Likes
13,787
AFL Club
Sydney
#88
Fraser Gehrig leaving hurt us a little - but we did get Kerr with the draft pick so it wasn't that horrible.
Judd leaving hurt our ego more than anything else. Our flag chances were done before he left. Wouldn't trade him back for Kennedy - let alone Masten too.
Brad Ebert is probably the worst one really. Him for pick #28. Port screwed us. Hurts now because he is playing great footy and can really see that he left a hole in our midfield.
Not sure port screwed use on the ebert deal. Yes he's become a good player now , but when he was at west coast, he was horrible. I wasn't quite sure if he completely understood the out of bounds on the full rule
 

Schulzenfest

Hall of Famer
Joined
Feb 23, 2008
Posts
49,095
Likes
112,474
Location
SA
AFL Club
Port Adelaide
Other Teams
Toronto Raptors
#89
This is another reason I think the Pies stuffed up in essentially letting Dawes go for Quentin Lynch.
They didn't let Dawes go for Quinten Lynch, they let Dawes go for pick 20 and got Quentin Lynch for free.

Brad Ebert is probably the worst one really. Him for pick #28. Port screwed us. Hurts now because he is playing great footy and can really see that he left a hole in our midfield.
That's the risk you took when you drafted a bloke named Ebert. Only yourselves to blame. Now hopefully you can get one back over the franchises by doing the same thing to GC with Brandon Matera sometime in the near future.
 

scarecrow2k1

Norm Smith Medallist
Joined
May 19, 2004
Posts
5,536
Likes
3,479
Location
Melbourne
AFL Club
Richmond
#90
They didn't let Dawes go for Quinten Lynch, they let Dawes go for pick 20 and got Quentin Lynch for free.
I'm aware of that- hence stating essentially as they basically made a decision that they could get Lynch now instead of waiting for Dawes. Yes they got pick 20 as a sweetener but that's somewhat unproven and could be anything from a best and fairest winner to a list clogger who is gone in a few years. Tim Broomhead, who was drafted, was highly regarded and touted as a higher pick so good on them, and they did prepare for the future and benefit the now so maybe not the best example. But I do believe that in a few years time it is a decision they will regret- maybe not a tear your hair out sort of shocker and not one in the regard of Trades that Hurt the Club as per the OP- but my base point is that teams shouldn't sacrifice the future for the now, and chosing Lynch, a forward who might contribute for 2 years, over Dawes, who will contribute for maybe 6-7, was shortsighted, even if they got a sweetener in a future pick.
 

Schulzenfest

Hall of Famer
Joined
Feb 23, 2008
Posts
49,095
Likes
112,474
Location
SA
AFL Club
Port Adelaide
Other Teams
Toronto Raptors
#91
Yes they got pick 20 as a sweetener but that's somewhat unproven and could be anything from a best and fairest winner to a list clogger who is gone in a few years.
Whereas Chris Dawes is a proven list clogger who, if he was still at Collingwood, would be gone in a few years.

Don't forget that they've got guys like Paine and Keefe (not a forward, but he allows Ben Reid to swing forward) waiting in the wings, both of whom will probably have surpassed Dawes' level by the time Lynch retires. Not to mention that Witts and Grundy will most likely develop into a killer Ryder/Bellchambers type combo which will give them another tall option up forward. Collingwood won't miss Dawes. No AFL team would miss Dawes.
 

Marlowe

The 'M' is Silent
Joined
Mar 12, 2012
Posts
21,636
Likes
33,133
Location
110th Street
AFL Club
Melbourne
Other Teams
Gold City Royals
#92
Scott Thompson for a pick that's wound being Matthew Bate. :/

Hindsight is an evil mistress. In 2001, we traded away picks - one to Geelong, who used it on Josh Kelly, the other to Adelaide, which could have been used on Dane Swan - for Clint Bizzell and Peter Vardy.
Maybe not terrible trades but what could have been could have been better.
 

Papermate

Premiership Player
Joined
Mar 11, 2012
Posts
4,058
Likes
4,725
AFL Club
Sydney
Other Teams
Liverpool, New England, Stanford
#94
How about Hawthorn's marvellous work in the last five years.

2008 off season.

>Ryan O'Keefe declares he wants to come to Hawthorn. They aren't willing to give up a first round pick, and he stays at Sydney.

>Wins Norm Smith Medal against Hawthorn four years later.

2009 off season.

>Trade away favourite son of the club Josh Kennedy away for peanuts.

>Becomes top ten player in the league, plays crucial role for team that beats them in a grand final and is about to hit his prime just as their midfield is about to fall apart.

Bravo Hawks.
 

hench

Norm Smith Medallist
Suspended
Joined
Jun 20, 2012
Posts
6,024
Likes
5,323
AFL Club
Brisbane Lions
#96
How about Hawthorn's marvellous work in the last five years.

2008 off season.

>Ryan O'Keefe declares he wants to come to Hawthorn. They aren't willing to give up a first round pick, and he stays at Sydney.

>Wins Norm Smith Medal against Hawthorn four years later.

2009 off season.

>Trade away favourite son of the club Josh Kennedy away for peanuts.

>Becomes top ten player in the league, plays crucial role for team that beats them in a grand final and is about to hit his prime just as their midfield is about to fall apart.

Bravo Hawks.
So two trades in 5 years?
 

CasuallyDressed

Brownlow Medallist
Joined
Nov 9, 2012
Posts
11,098
Likes
9,442
AFL Club
Collingwood
Other Teams
Pacers, Rockies, Colts, Avalanche
#97
- Traded pick #7 to get pick #10 and Chad Morrison. There were other pieces that moved around but Hawthorn got pick #7 and picked up Jordan Lewis ... we got stuck with Chris Egan. I dunno if we would have drafted Lewis with #7 but would love him playing for Collingwood. Egan is gone and Morrison did NOTHING.

- Heath Scotland for pick #35. I'm sure it was #35 and Scotland has been a good player for a long time. I know we drafted Brent Hall with that pick and he was useless.

- Steven Mckee. We could have had Pavlich, I think.
 

scarecrow2k1

Norm Smith Medallist
Joined
May 19, 2004
Posts
5,536
Likes
3,479
Location
Melbourne
AFL Club
Richmond
#99
Whereas Chris Dawes is a proven list clogger who, if he was still at Collingwood, would be gone in a few years.

Don't forget that they've got guys like Paine and Keefe (not a forward, but he allows Ben Reid to swing forward) waiting in the wings, both of whom will probably have surpassed Dawes' level by the time Lynch retires. Not to mention that Witts and Grundy will most likely develop into a killer Ryder/Bellchambers type combo which will give them another tall option up forward. Collingwood won't miss Dawes. No AFL team would miss Dawes.
Well I guess thats where we disagree. I dont think he's a list clogger and think he's quite a good 3rd Tall option. Yes he's had some difficulty but I still think he's viable going forward.
 

BACCS

BigFooty Juggernaut
Joined
May 10, 2009
Posts
39,639
Likes
16,892
Location
Adelaide Oval
AFL Club
Adelaide
Other Teams
Gary Putland, Redbacks, Oz Cricket
I get what you are saying about what could have been but I seriously doubt HT was on anyone else's draft radar in round 1. HT was a Wells special and mature age before the mature age thing got popular.. and we got all kinds of looks like WTF when he was taken...

GO Catters
Mature age picks had been around well before the Harry Taylor pick. The Crows picking up Ben Hudson in the early 2000s is always an example I use here. It didn't just become popular because Geelong had one.
 
Top Bottom