Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

PL all time.![]()
Am I seeing a trend with this ?
Am I seeing a trend with this ?
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
For me the practice of signing footballers purely as investments needs to be regulated or stopped. Unethical and used to dodge FFP (amortization not on your FFP books while your player is out on loan).
Have no problem with a player being signed with a view to eventually playing for the club that bought him.
I believe that any new signing should not allowed to be loaned out for the first season of their contract. That should sort out which deals are genuine in their intent of developing a player and which ones are done purely to sell a player at a profit. After that first season loaning should be allowed.
You're always going to overpay for strikers though. There just aren't that many top class strikers going around. Is Lukaku's skill-set better than Coutinho's? No, probably not. Does he have a history of banging in goals? Yup. That adds a premium.Luk went for 90m and most on here thought he was worth it.
Cout us a much better player but you don't think he is worth more?
Again, what he's actually worth and what clubs would have to spend to get him are two different things.
I really don't understand why so many have struggled to grasp that concept...
You're always going to overpay for strikers though. There just aren't that many top class strikers going around. Is Lukaku's skill-set better than Coutinho's? No, probably not. Does he have a history of banging in goals? Yup. That adds a premium.
For me the practice of signing footballers purely as investments needs to be regulated or stopped. Unethical and used to dodge FFP (amortization not on your FFP books while your player is out on loan).
Have no problem with a player being signed with a view to eventually playing for the club that bought him.
I believe that any new signing should not allowed to be loaned out for the first season of their contract. That should sort out which deals are genuine in their intent of developing a player and which ones are done purely to sell a player at a profit. After that first season loaning should be allowed.
He might not be wrong with that but it's also not sustainable to allow rivals to continually gain advantages on you if you want to try and win things. If he's happy just making sure the club is financially strong without necessarily winning anything, then he's doing a superb job.Also:
http://www.espnfc.com.au/tottenham-...nding-in-premier-league-totally-unsustainable
Take it from me or someone who supports Leeds/Rangers, he's not wrong at all.
Haha salty united supporter in denial
Also:
http://www.espnfc.com.au/tottenham-...nding-in-premier-league-totally-unsustainable
Take it from me or someone who supports Leeds/Rangers, he's not wrong at all.
He might not be wrong with that but it's also not sustainable to allow rivals to continually gain advantages on you if you want to try and win things. If he's happy just making sure the club is financially strong without necessarily winning anything, then he's doing a superb job.
They may have but how long do you think the United's and City's of the league will continue to perform poorly when spending the coin they are? In the next couple of seasons, you would expect them to be challenging for the title. If Spurs don't spend more money, I just don't see how they can continue to perform at that rate.They finished second last season, I don't think there's anything wrong with what he's doing. Everyone expected them to drop off and they didn't. This season will be the interesting one.
One point though - he says at the end the attraction is that if a player does well, Spurs offer them a better contract. While I think that's admirable, would Spurs tear up a contract and offer a worse one if the player has a terrible season?
In denial about what?
To compare Coutinho (mid) with Lukaku (striker) is stupid. But if you want to then the player scoring 20+ goals a year is always going to be worth more than the midfielder who doesn't come close to that.
It's science.
They may have but how long do you think the United's and City's of the league will continue to perform poorly when spending the coin they are? In the next couple of seasons, you would expect them to be challenging for the title. If Spurs don't spend more money, I just don't see how they can continue to perform at that rate.
I do know that - but let's not kid ourselves, we only won that season because all of the big clubs were terrible in the same season. Even then, Spurs couldn't get it done.You would expect them to but that won't necessarily be the case. You of all people should know that money doesn't always equal success, and that a strong core group of players with the right tactics can be successful.
um you can compare the value of 2 players, they dont have to play the exact same position.
stop being a bias moron.