Transfer discussion thread

[Memphis]

Erling want to sign with Ole? Don’t think so.

Norwegians stick together.

 

[pantskyle]

Erling want to sign with Ole? Don’t think so.

I don't see why he wouldn't, they are very close, Ole has spoken only recently that they stay in touch with each other.

 

[TheGreatBarryB]

I don't see why he wouldn't, they are very close, Ole has spoken only recently that they stay in touch with each other.

Erling: “ Lovely guy and all but....”

 

[pantskyle]

Erling: “ Lovely guy and all but....”

If United agreed to the buyout clause he'd likely already be a United player. I don't believe for one second United isn't in with a shot.

 

[citizen-erased]

Would he join psg for poch

Man city will have there pick of strikers to replace aguero

Tipping Haaland and Kane to be at each of the Manchesters....not sure which lands where.

Both are going to be well served with the midfields behind them

PSG will likely come in for Lloris & Dele, possibly Foyth too if the option isn't taken on him.
Could just flick us 200m

 

[pantskyle]

Tipping Haaland and Kane to be at each of the Manchesters....not sure which lands where.

Both are going to be well served with the midfields behind them

PSG will likely come in for Lloris & Dele, possibly Foyth too if the option isn't taken on him.
Could just flick us 200m

Would Lloris go and play back up to Navas?

 

[citizen-erased]

Would Lloris go and play back up to Navas?

i think the idea is Navas moves on. or retires.
Just going off the rumour mill at the moment. I'm not sure Hugo would leave tbh.

Aurier has been linked too....though i don't know what PSG bridges he burnt.
A year of Neymar - Kane - Mbappe surely brings them a CL trophy.
They'd even have the luxury of resting Kane during his Jan/Feb risk period.

 

[chef]

I dont see Kane going abroad.

One Manchester club gets him and the other gets Haaland, they'd both be happy with that and the rest of us are ****ed.

 

[Peter Sidorkiewicz]

I dont see Kane going abroad.

One Manchester club gets him and the other gets Haaland, they'd both be happy with that and the rest of us are f’ed.

I can't see Kane going to Manchester United. If he is to leave Spurs, it is for trophies and going to Man City is more of a sure thing (to win trophies) than Man United, especially if Pep remains in charge.

Given Kane can play as a no. 10, imagine if City got both Kane and Haaland. It would be all over.

 

[pantskyle]

City potentially ruining football.

 

[chef]

I can't see Kane going to Manchester United. If he is to leave Spurs, it is for trophies and going to Man City is more of a sure thing (to win trophies) than Man United, especially if Pep remains in charge.

Given Kane can play as a no. 10, imagine if City got both Kane and Haaland. It would be all over.

Kane would win trophies at United.

 

[UnitedWarrior93]

Kane, providing he stays fit would be huge for us.

 

[Art Vandelay_]

There’s the pointless Kane talk square on the bingo card filled.

 

[pantskyle]

There’s the pointless Kane talk square on the bingo card filled.

Is it pointless tho? Another season without a trophy, another possible manager, maybe no CL. He may ask to leave. It's not inconceivable to think.

 

[Art Vandelay_]

Is it pointless tho? Another season without a trophy, another possible manager, maybe no CL. He may ask to leave. It's not inconceivable to think.

See you next year when this same conversation comes up. Again.
He's too loyal for his own good and won't actively rock the boat required to leave.

 

[pantskyle]

See you next year when this same conversation comes up. Again.
He's too loyal for his own good and won't actively rock the boat required to leave.

See you next week when I bring it up again and turn it into a saga.

 

[SM]

See you next week when I bring it up again and turn it into a saga.

If it's a saga and he doesn't join is it a snubbing?

 

[pantskyle]

If it's a saga and he doesn't join is it a snubbing?

Sure why not.

 

[Art Vandelay_]

See you next week when I bring it up again and turn it into a saga.

Sorry, booked solid next week.
Have a 2 hour window on Thursday 1-3. Should I book you in?

 

[chef]

Is it pointless tho? Another season without a trophy, another possible manager, maybe no CL. He may ask to leave. It's not inconceivable to think.

Yep. Maybe he has some ambition.

 

[pantskyle]

Sorry, booked solid next week.
Have a 2 hour window on Thursday 1-3. Should I book you in?

It's a date.

 

[Art Vandelay_]

Yep. Maybe he has some ambition.

And if he didn't miss guilt edge chances v Zagreb we'd still be in that comp. He said he was fit for the CL final, and then was well off the pace.
He missed the key chance in the Croatia game at the WC. Let's see if he takes the bull by the horns in the league cup final and wins it for the club.

By all means he's far less culpable than most for the malaise but he's hardly blameless in the lack of trophies as well.

 

[Thistle]

Would you rather win a trophy with club you've been at for a year or get a statue outside WHL?

 

[99 Problems]

The problem for Kane is no matter how much money Spurs would get for him, they can’t actually replace him. There’s only a handful of attacking players in the world at his level and they aren’t able to get any of them. They can use the cash to strengthen a few positions but even then it won’t stretch that far and they’d still need to spend it well. It just makes no sense to let him go.

If he ever was to leave he’d be terrifying in that Manchester City squad/system.

 

[Magma]

i'd be quite surprised if we ended up with anyone who wasnt haaland or joao felix, other than them staying that their clubs. i dont see us paying the fee spurs would want.