Remove this Banner Ad

Transfer discussion thread

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Status
Not open for further replies.
PSG just doing what we all do on FIFA games, search for world class players with 0-12 months left on their contracts and signing them for free.
 
It'll definitely boost their revenue, but does having Messi compared to Mbappe and Neymar really translate into that much extra $$? I'm not sure but I guess it's not my money.
 
They spent the first minute and 40 seconds showing the club shop and other images around the stadium and then Lionel Messi standing on the pitch like a ******* idiot for about 4 seconds. I still can’t tell if that is really Lionel Messi because it looks like a promo image of Messi from FIFA.

They weren't even the first to announce the deal. The following tweet was:



That's the brother of the emir of Qatar announcing that Messi has been signed on Aug 7th. Shows what PSG is all about.
 
They weren't even the first to announce the deal. The following tweet was:



That's the brother of the emir of Qatar announcing that Messi has been signed on Aug 7th. Shows what PSG is all about.


How was that tweet missed by everyone? 4 days ago?
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

It'll definitely boost their revenue, but does having Messi compared to Mbappe and Neymar really translate into that much extra $$? I'm not sure but I guess it's not my money.

Matchday corporate revenue will increase significantly and that's about it in terms of direct income. Commercial income I don't see it. It is Ligue 1 after all and all existing sponsorship deals are already agreed Messi or no Messi. Shirt sales will obviously be significant but they go to the kit manufacturer (Nike) who has already paid PSG for the right to sell them. This does expire at the end of the season and it will be interesting to see what new kit deal PSG get with Messi being a short term signing. TV rights are already done for Ligue (secured by Amazon in June) so that benefit goes mostly to Amazon and any extra will go to all clubs in the league.


I think we will probably see a breakdown by a football finance expert soon in the coming weeks on this deal Swiss ramble style.
 
They spent the first minute and 40 seconds showing the club shop and other images around the stadium and then Lionel Messi standing on the pitch like a ******* idiot for about 4 seconds. I still can’t tell if that is really Lionel Messi because it looks like a promo image of Messi from FIFA.
One take drone shots are all the rage right now but they got carried away with trying to make it cool rather than the whole purpose of the video - Messi.
 
It'll definitely boost their revenue, but does having Messi compared to Mbappe and Neymar really translate into that much extra $$? I'm not sure but I guess it's not my money.
When it comes time to renew commercial deals or sign new ones it will. The amount of coverage they are generating today is worth $'s in these deals. The deal wont pay for itself but bringing in a mega signing like that will bring in more commercial revenue. Same with Ronaldo at Juventus. They had stars and won many titles but bringing in a worldwide star that transcends the sport is massive even if on the pitch results don't improve drastically.
 
When it comes time to renew commercial deals or sign new ones it will. The amount of coverage they are generating today is worth $'s in these deals. The deal wont pay for itself but bringing in a mega signing like that will bring in more commercial revenue. Same with Ronaldo at Juventus. They had stars and won many titles but bringing in a worldwide star that transcends the sport is massive even if on the pitch results don't improve drastically.

I guess, I just see Mbappe as already a ridiculously huge star, and Neymar was a huge statement signing. I don't know how many sponsors who hadn't jumped on at that point will now, or how much more money sponsors will fork out to the club, to the point of making Messi's signing 'pay for itself' as I think I saw in a piece on the deal.
 
Disappointed Messi went to France. I would've liked to have seen him perform in the EPL the best league in the world instead he took the easy option.
He's worth hundreds of millions, he didn't need the money.
 
Disappointed Messi went to France. I would've liked to have seen him perform in the EPL the best league in the world instead he took the easy option.
He's worth hundreds of millions, he didn't need the money.

He would have been the best player in England. We just won’t see it with our own eyes.

And thank ****. He would have played for City and scorched the PL.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

When it comes time to renew commercial deals or sign new ones it will. The amount of coverage they are generating today is worth $'s in these deals. The deal wont pay for itself but bringing in a mega signing like that will bring in more commercial revenue. Same with Ronaldo at Juventus. They had stars and won many titles but bringing in a worldwide star that transcends the sport is massive even if on the pitch results don't improve drastically.

All of their commercial deals are signed long term apart from the kit deal. Juve isn't comparable as commercially Serie A is far more attractive than Ligue 1 to potential commercial partners. Messi does not change that one bit.


Very unlikely the new kit deal in 2022 for PSG will see Messi make a significant difference as he will only be around for another season by that stage. Perhaps PSG could negotiate extra for Messi jersey sales although I suspect Messi will want a bit part of that for the one season he will be around under the new kit deal.


PSG already had the world's biggest star in Mbappe. Who incidentally is still not putting pen to paper on a new contract with 12 months remaining on his current deal.


There's a reason why only PSG were willing to do this deal and no other clubs even bothered. It's a huge financial burden and the question has to be asked why Messi was prepared to play for Barca on 50% of the wages he gets at PSG. Ronaldo at Juve at least made a significant impact on winning two league titles. PSG were already winning Ligue 1 at a cakewalk this season with financial issues for most clubs and Lille being picked apart.
 
I guess, I just see Mbappe as already a ridiculously huge star, and Neymar was a huge statement signing. I don't know how many sponsors who hadn't jumped on at that point will now, or how much more money sponsors will fork out to the club, to the point of making Messi's signing 'pay for itself' as I think I saw in a piece on the deal.
Messi is on a different level to them both.

I was at the barber this morning and I kid you not it was spoken about by 3 different people who walked in. The first two not major followers of the sport. They were talking about PSG and now know something about them for the first time. The third was a Spaniard from Barca who was pretty gutted.

To all of us yeah sure we know how great Neymar and Mbappe is. But if you had to show a picture of Mbappe to 1,000 random people and say name this man I think a lot less would get it right compared to if you showed Messi or Ronaldo's face.
 
All of their commercial deals are signed long term apart from the kit deal
You know the ins and out of all of their commercial deals now....

Shit between advising the Vic govt not to build the East-West tunnel because nobody travels those directions for work and being part of all of PSG's commercial deal negotiations how do you have any time to spend on here?
 
Very unlikely the new kit deal in 2022 for PSG will see Messi make a significant difference as he will only be around for another season by that stage. Perhaps PSG could negotiate extra for Messi jersey sales although I suspect Messi will want a bit part of that for the one season he will be around under the new kit deal.
Kit deals are a % of revenue generated from kits sold. So if they sale 10% more kits this year to last year they get 10% more. Even if they don't re-negotiate a Messi % increase
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Forget re-negotiating existing deals although I suspect that will happen.

There'll be plenty of new companies looking to form an association with the club that has Messi play for it.

Neymar was huge for PSG, but Messi is bigger imo.
 
You know the ins and out of all of their commercial deals now....

sh*t between advising the Vic govt not to build the East-West tunnel because nobody travels those directions for work and being part of all of PSG's commercial deal negotiations how do you have any time to spend on here?

LOL

You do realise that they're all publicly available!


Nike have PSG until 2032, not 2022. I was mistaken. Nike aren't renegotiating anything. Accor only just signed up, their new major jersey sponsor. They've even brought Qatar Tourism authority back on board but don't be surprised if that magically increases by 20 million a season.

It's a wonder you haven't been signed up the by the government as an adviser as you believe that the East-West white elephant should have been built. Also it seems you seem to know better than pretty much every club in Europe who stayed away from the Messi deal as it didn't make financial sense. I guess they should have consulted yourself first because you seem to all have it figured out lol.
 
LOL

You do realise that they're all publicly available!

Nike have PSG until 2032, not 2022. I was mistaken. Nike aren't renegotiating anything. Accor only just signed up, their new major jersey sponsor. They've even brought Qatar Tourism authority back on board but don't be surprised if that magically increases by 20 million a season.
I already explained to you they have % of revenue from kit deals. As do all clubs.

Question.. Will they sell more or less shirts this season with Messi or not having Messi?
It's a wonder you haven't been signed up the by the government as an adviser as you believe that the East-West white elephant should have been built. Also it seems you seem to know better than pretty much every club in Europe who stayed away from the Messi deal as it didn't make financial sense. I guess they should have consulted yourself first because you seem to all have it figured out lol.
I already said with SM they wont recoup all the money spent on this deal. But they will generate SOME extra revenue out of this deal to cover SOME of the costs associated with it. Only PSG and perhaps City and Chelsea can afford to make these sorts of deals.
 
Disappointed Messi went to France. I would've liked to have seen him perform in the EPL the best league in the world instead he took the easy option.
He's worth hundreds of millions, he didn't need the money.
Yeah but he has the value so why shouldn’t he capitalise on that? PSG the only ones who could afford it. Would’ve been great to see him in EPL though.
 
I already explained to you they have % of revenue from kit deals. As do all clubs.

Question.. Will they sell more or less shirts this season with Messi or not having Messi?

I already said with SM they wont recoup all the money spent on this deal. But they will generate SOME extra revenue out of this deal to cover SOME of the costs associated with it. Only PSG and perhaps City and Chelsea can afford to make these sorts of deals.


What's the story with kit sale percentages? Of course they'll sell more kits this season, that goes without saying. Nike are already paying a record amount to be the kit sponsor for PSG. 80m euros per season until 2032 to be precise. Why would they give up extra revenue just because Messi has signed? And if they did yes you are correct it would likely be only a small percentage (10% like you claim).

At least you are getting the part about the deal not being financially viable correct.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top