- Banned
- #5,726
You say that but after we won the league I think we brought in Adrian on a free.
Arsenal might operate differently to Liverpool eh
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
You say that but after we won the league I think we brought in Adrian on a free.
Refresh my memory, who didn't work out?
Wenger was a while back now.
Fabio Vieira seems a good transfer for all parties ?
well how do you improve on the best keeper best defence best midfield and best attack to have ever existedYou say that but after we won the league I think we brought in Adrian on a free.
well how do you improve on the best keeper best defence best midfield and best attack to have ever existed
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
So true.well how do you improve on the best keeper best defence best midfield and best attack to have ever existed
Connolly is gash. He can't score in any league he goes to.Conolly from Brighton and Ebiowie from Palace both joining on loan in the next few days for us, don't mind either of them, bolster the attacking ranks.
Lots of interest in Oscar, Tufan, Tetteh and Sinik but suspect we'll try to hold onto all of them.
Connolly is gash. He can't score in any league he goes to.
Conolly from Brighton and Ebiowie from Palace both joining on loan in the next few days for us, don't mind either of them, bolster the attacking ranks.
Lots of interest in Oscar, Tufan, Tetteh and Sinik but suspect we'll try to hold onto all of them.
Connolly is absolute
rubbish.
Shame as he broke on the scene with such promise. Rosenior must back himself to turn him around.
Thats why it's being spread over instalments, I guess.Lol.
FFP.
Thats why it's being spread over instalments, I guess.
Is it the length of the original contract or does it get further diluted by extensions?for ffp purposes, at least in the past idk what the rules are these days it was spread over the length of the contract, hence amortisation.
still, bloody hell.
i believe it's the original length. so say it's 120 mil 6 year contract, that's 20 mil on your next 6 statements. im sure there's other stuff involved and it might be different now since the relaxing of the rules a couple years back but thats how i always understood it.Is it the length of the original contract or does it get further diluted by extensions?
Holy s**t