Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
€600m in a season is utterly ****ed.I get bringing in players to improve the squad but Boehly is ******* nuts.
The money being spent is just absurd.
I think it's generally hyperbole to say 'X club is ruining football' but this is the closest I've seen to it.€600m in a season is utterly ****ed.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
I guess at least we are consistent.Chelsea ruining football.
I think it's generally hyperbole to say 'X club is ruining football' but this is the closest I've seen to it.
Honestly think it's time spending is capped at something.
Ironically, Newcastle are killing it this season and yet haven't had to drop half a billion to do it. Maybe Chelsea would be better off investing in the background rather that just pissing money up the wall.
Yep. Wages should be capped at around 60% of turnover. Transfer spending should be limited to a maximum of 100m net per season and an average of 60m net per season over 4 seasons.
A rule like that would really benefit Liverpool and the 2 manchester clubs a lot more than everyone else.
It would benefit smaller clubs more than anybody else.
There may as well be a setting where he automatically thumbs down his posts as soon as he hits reply.Name a more iconic duo, I’ll wait.
![]()
![]()
Yeah. He better be good.
Yep. Wages should be capped at around 60% of turnover. Transfer spending should be limited to a maximum of 100m net per season and an average of 60m net per season over 4 seasons.
locked the door behind canceloSo Bernardo somehow avoids leaving City yet again.
Chelsea seemed to only have interest because Enzo started most most matches at the World Cup and played well. If you’re paying £105 million for a player, usually you have been tracking the player for months and up to a year but if that’s the case, then Chelsea could have bought Enzo last June for a fraction of the cost. But they weren’t even in for Enzo back then, he seemingly slipped under anyones radar and now here we are. Incredibly odd.The new James.
Chelsea seemed to only have interest because Enzo started most most matches at the World Cup and played well. If you’re paying £105 million for a player, usually you have been tracking the player for months and up to a year but if that’s the case, then Chelsea could have bought Enzo last June for a fraction of the cost. But they weren’t even in for Enzo back then, he seemingly slipped under anyones radar and now here we are. Incredibly odd.
Hes was talked about before the WC TBH.Chelsea seemed to only have interest because Enzo started most most matches at the World Cup and played well. If you’re paying £105 million for a player, usually you have been tracking the player for months and up to a year but if that’s the case, then Chelsea could have bought Enzo last June for a fraction of the cost. But they weren’t even in for Enzo back then, he seemingly slipped under anyones radar and now here we are. Incredibly odd.
I was thinking more like a luxury tax.Hard and fast rules like that will never work.
Yeah I remember his name being linked in the preseason.Thanks for the correction guys.
How maddening then that Chelsea had a chance to sign him for little cost and couldn’t.
Hes was talked about before the WC TBH.
The €270m in the offseason took them from 3rd to 10th€600m in a season is utterly ****ed.
and it feels so goodChelsea ruining football.
The €270m in the offseason took them from 3rd to 10th
Maybe the €330m they spent in January will take them from 10th to 18th
All that just to get bundled out of the UCL by Anthony Modeste€600m in a season is utterly ****ed.