- Moderator
- #1,301
Sounds like we may have put in a £35m plus add ons bid for Sterling and £25m bid for Ake. Busy day for Boehly.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: Richmond v Melbourne - 7:25PM Wed
Squiggle tips Demons at 77% chance -- What's your tip? -- Team line-ups »
Think they might need some defenders first.Ugh, didn't see Raphinha to Chelsea coming. Chelski clearly building to be title contenders again
Would have been busier if he came up with an offer that wouldn't take half a second to reject.Sounds like we may have put in a £35m plus add ons bid for Sterling and £25m bid for Ake. Busy day for Boehly.
I guess thats just the start.Would have been busier if he came up with an offer that wouldn't take half a second to reject.
He's taking the United approach.I guess thats just the start.
I guess thats how negotiations work, we'll probably end up meeting in the middleHe's taking the United approach.
Why?Those figures for Sterling is laughable.
35m? Why on earth would City sell him for that little (especially to a potential rival)? He's homegrown, well proven in the PL, he's only 27.Why?
Final year of contract though. I think the fee will be closer to 50m.35m? Why on earth would City sell him for that little (especially to a potential rival)? He's homegrown, well proven in the PL, he's only 27.
I would've thought it would be far closer to the 55-60m mark. Maybe 50m if City are feeling charitable.
The talk coming out is that we think we can get him for a similar price to Jesus. So we're starting below that.35m? Why on earth would City sell him for that little (especially to a potential rival)? He's homegrown, well proven in the PL, he's only 27.
I would've thought it would be far closer to the 55-60m mark. Maybe 50m if City are feeling charitable.
It's just the start of talks and who knows what the add ons are. I think it'll end up around 45-50m which is pretty fair considering he's only got a year left.35m? Why on earth would City sell him for that little (especially to a potential rival)? He's homegrown, well proven in the PL, he's only 27.
I would've thought it would be far closer to the 55-60m mark. Maybe 50m if City are feeling charitable.
Just shows how far ahead City are of the rest when “big six” rivals want to sign their cast offs and that City are happy to oblige.
Yes. Outside of Mount they aren't much chop. And a few are being moved on.Sterling and raph.
Wingers really an issue for chelsea?
35m? Why on earth would City sell him for that little (especially to a potential rival)? He's homegrown, well proven in the PL, he's only 27.
I would've thought it would be far closer to the 55-60m mark. Maybe 50m if City are feeling charitable.
Lewandowski might but I've seen no indication Sterling is even entertaining the idea.If Sterling wants to push the issue he can buy himself out of the last year of the contract by invoking FIFA Article 17 (Webster ruling) which says a player may pay out the remainder of their contract if his or her's current contract is older than 3 years to terminate it. At 300k / week that would be a payout fee of 16 million pounds.
There was some talk of Lewandoski doing this as it seems like he definitely does not want to be at Bayern next season but it is a drastic action and probably only one taken if there's a complete breakdown in relationship between player and club.