Remove this Banner Ad

Transfer discussion thread

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Status
Not open for further replies.
He’d give us a goal scorer but he wouldn’t fix the keeper, defense, midfield or depth. The squad needs a big overhaul to become a challenger.

Utd would be better off with Vlahovic. Would be cheaper fee and much better long term prospect. Wages would also be much lower. Invest the difference elsewhere. Always a risk dropping a huge transfer fee on a 30 year old unless it's a keeper.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

They need a new keeper and another CM too, but they arent that far away. ETH has closed the gap a fair bit already just in his first season.
They still have Harry Maguire. Kane will just be trying to score to equalise every game after Haz puts one into his own net or makes a horrible mistake in defense to gift a goal.
 
They still have Harry Maguire. Kane will just be trying to score to equalise every game after Haz puts one into his own net or makes a horrible mistake in defense to gift a goal.
Maguire will probably be on loan somewhere next season so that shouldn't be an issue
 
Utd would be better off with Vlahovic. Would be cheaper fee and much better long term prospect. Wages would also be much lower. Invest the difference elsewhere. Always a risk dropping a huge transfer fee on a 30 year old unless it's a keeper.
Vlahovic? He's looked shit this season.
 
Kane is guaranteed goals. He's also used to being at a club in crisis.

Is he though? Being a top class high profile footballer from a Norf London club is no guarantee of goals when they move to Utd as we have seen in the past.
 
Is he though? Being a top class high profile footballer from a Norf London club is no guarantee of goals when they move to Utd as we have seen in the past.

Who is this referring to? RvP did pretty well.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Is he though? Being a top class high profile footballer from a Norf London club is no guarantee of goals when they move to Utd as we have seen in the past.
Berbatov? Sheringham? Both were pretty good signings.

Sanchez would be considered a fail. But had a few hits as well (RVP as SM said)
 
Is he though? Being a top class high profile footballer from a Norf London club is no guarantee of goals when they move to Utd as we have seen in the past.


Alexis Sanchez on 400k + / week

There isn’t a comparison between Kane and Sanchez. Sanchez stayed for two seasons and played 45 times. His time at the club was a mess from the beginning. It would be United being scared of buying Vinicius Jr just because Di Maria and Falcao are South Americans that didn’t pan out for United.

In your heart of hearts, do you really believe that Harry Kane would fail at Manchester United?
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

He scored 31 goals in his last 57 Premier League games at Arsenal.

How about in his last 10-15 with Arsenal? There's a reason they let him leave.
 
Is he though? Being a top class high profile footballer from a Norf London club is no guarantee of goals when they move to Utd as we have seen in the past.
Kane is as much of a sure thing as there is. As he has shown as Spurs, even when the team he's in are shit, he will still score for fun.
 
He scored 31 goals in his last 57 Premier League games at Arsenal.

He was on the decline in the months leading to his exit and really should’ve been allowed to leave much earlier. For himself and Arsenal. Wenger rejecting £60m from City with 12 months left on his contract was madness.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top