moomba
TheBrownDog
Are all English clubs that have the nerve to buy players from other clubs entitled, or just the ones that try to buy Tottenham players?
For €100m. Take it.
Avoids selling to entitled English clubs.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Are all English clubs that have the nerve to buy players from other clubs entitled, or just the ones that try to buy Tottenham players?
For €100m. Take it.
Avoids selling to entitled English clubs.
Good addition to the squad.
Good deal for both clubsGood addition to the squad.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Yep, and done without the amateur dramatics that so many other transfers seem to warrant.Good deal for both clubs
Are all English clubs that have the nerve to buy players from other clubs entitled, or just the ones that try to buy Tottenham players?
Not at all. They’re all 1 way arrangements. Name the last players both Manchester clubs, Liverpool, Arsenal or Chelsea sold us.Crazy imo. You get millions less and the rival club just spends their money on someone just as good (and probably cheaper).
All for the sake of saving face.
Not at all. They’re all 1 way arrangements. Name the last players both Manchester clubs, Liverpool, Arsenal or Chelsea sold us.
Don’t have the stature to get a player put of any of the first 3 clubs so you’ll find most fans support Daniel refusing to sell any of our players to rival clubs. I disagreed with selling Walker, and that is one of the worst decisions we’ve made in a long time.
No need to patronise. You know what I mean by 1 way arrangment.The nature of a player transfer is a two way arrangement. Buying club gets player, selling club gets money.
With that money, selling club is able to invest on new players, infrastructure, whatever they want. Doesn't really matter if you invest that money on a player from Liverpool, City, United etc or somewhere else.
Harry Maguire's there if you want him.Not at all. They’re all 1 way arrangements. Name the last players both Manchester clubs, Liverpool, Arsenal or Chelsea sold us.
Don’t have the stature to get a player put of any of the first 3 clubs so you’ll find most fans support Daniel refusing to sell any of our players to rival clubs. I disagreed with selling Walker, and that is one of the worst decisions we’ve made in a long time.
I am not afraid to slap you.Harry Maguire's there if you want him.![]()
Would give City 24 hours to go 110M plus.
Sounds like we'll have a face to face with United over Mount this week. £60m is probs the magic number.
I'll be very amused if Rice goes for more than Kane.I am not afraid to slap you.
Wow. More than the club and its circus tent is worth![]()
You think? Don't think United are going any higher. Chelsea will need to come down IMO.
60m is in the middle of what we want and you are offering, a compromise.
Have you really walked away?The compromise was United going as high as we did and then we walked away with the offer on the table. Hope they stick to it and walk away if Chelsea continues to be unreasonable.
Have you really walked away?
Seems we'll meet face to face like we asked and we'll meet somewhere in the middle price wise.