This often gets quoted out of context.
What Klopp was actually saying is that if had to coach a dud like Pogba at Liverpool "I'm not in a job anymore".
The comment was disguised with the other stuff to protect SAF's blood pressure.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

PLUS Your club board comp is now up!
BigFooty Tipping Notice Img
Weekly Prize - Join Any Time - Tip Opening Round
The Golden Ticket - Official AFL on-seller of MCG and Marvel Medallion Club tickets and Corporate Box tickets at the Gabba, MCG and Marvel.
This often gets quoted out of context.
Yep, this is more my point.
It's not like there's several footballers now going for 150m plus. There might be a few more crossing the 100m threshold but it's not like clubs are blasting past that. Despite inflation in the player market.
Any objective Liverpool supporter would accept that the club has spend big when they are confronted with a specific need. VVD was a huge hole filled, Becker was a huge hole filled (KariusNot suggesting Liverpool supporters shouldn't be excited about this. They should. Transfers are a huge part of the joy we get to experience as football fans.
There's just no need to defend the absurd amounts of money being thrown around, like Liverpool are somehow better than any other club while doing it.
), Nunez I guess replaces Firmino, Szoboszlai is part of a much needed midfield upgrade and so is Caicedo.Log in to remove this Banner Ad
I wonder the same, all fine when your recruitment is spot on as it seems to be with Brighton. Sell a player for big money, and his replacement is just as good or better.I am curious at if there'll be a tipping point for Brighton. Everyone thought Southampton were the model club because they sold players for huge fees and seemingly just replaced them, and then.. it just stopped. You have a few transfers that bust, you get a bad run of form, or a few unlucky injuries, does it all implode? Or is their model even better? Will be really interesting.
I am curious at if there'll be a tipping point for Brighton. Everyone thought Southampton were the model club because they sold players for huge fees and seemingly just replaced them, and then.. it just stopped. You have a few transfers that bust, you get a bad run of form, or a few unlucky injuries, does it all implode? Or is their model even better? Will be really interesting.
Of course its deducted from the transfer fee. Unless Man United have a magical money tree that pays off its players, its coming from that transfer fee potUnited get £30m. That is not in question. United will agree a payout separately with Maguire. This is being reported at £6.5m but that's not accurate and this figure is not deducted from the transfer fee.
The Sun got it from talkSport. Its also been in the Guardian but Im pretty sure talkSPORT is the main sourceNo it isn't. More than happy for you to provide a solid source though that doesn't originate back from the original source which I believe was The Sun.
The only people struggling at Liverpool fans who are performing gymnastics like always to say how they can spend the money after months of saying they have no money to spend.7 years later and everyone still struggling with the concept of net spend.
The Sun got it from talkSport. Its also been in the Guardian but Im pretty sure talkSPORT is the main source
You seemingly really struggle with the concept.The only people struggling at Liverpool fans who are performing gymnastics like always to say how they can spend the money after months of saying they have no money to spend.
The s*n and TalkSport are rubbish. Guardian is ok.The Sun got it from talkSport. Its also been in the Guardian but Im pretty sure talkSPORT is the main source
It definitely is not and you don't know the terms or the amount of the payment to Maguire either. Transfers and Wages come from different pots as you call it. United don't receive £30m less Maguires payout from West Ham. For example, United may pay Maguire £50,000 per week for two years from their wage bill. We don't receive a lower transfer fee.Of course its deducted from the transfer fee. Unless Man United have a magical money tree that pays off its players, its coming from that transfer fee pot
Crooky on Talk Sport is decent on United but not Tier 1. Even then, he normally finds out stuff after the fact and just provides good detail around how a deal developed.The s*n and TalkSport are rubbish. Guardian is ok.
talkSPORT and West Ham news seems to be 100% spot on. David Sullivan is on that show constantly.Ok so you agree it's a crap source.
Why would West Ham or Sullivan know intimate details of negotiations between United and Maguire? Maguire will be compensated to an extent but nobody knows the structure or amount.talkSPORT and West Ham news seems to be 100% spot on. David Sullivan is on that show constantly.
I mean do you guys think Maguire is taking a 100k per week paycut without any payment or compensation?