Remove this Banner Ad

Transfer Discussion Thread

  • Thread starter Thread starter RossFC
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Liverpool should really take that.
Why? Since they are throwing money away willy nilly they can stump up more than 100m euros - especially if they are giving Salah 170m euros a year.

Salah's pass against Newcastle was worth 50m euros alone.

No chance Liverpool sell for 100m
 
Why? Since they are throwing money away willy nilly they can stump up more than 100m euros - especially if they are giving Salah 170m euros a year.

Salah's pass against Newcastle was worth 50m euros alone.

No chance Liverpool sell for 100m
He's 31 and there's no guarantee you make top 4 this season anyway.

Take the absurd cash for an aging star and use it to rebuild.
 
He's 31 and there's no guarantee you make top 4 this season anyway.

Take the absurd cash for an aging star and use it to rebuild.

There's no guarantee of top 4 in any season. He's at the peak of his game. Keeps himself in absolute peak condition too, an absolute monk in his ways.


I doubt any offer is enough for Liverpool to even consider selling him this window. I'd say the only way it happens is if Mbappe were to be signed for around the same amount Salah is sold for. The chance of that happening is less than 2%.


If we want to cash in we can take the cash for an aging star in 2025 and sell him for 100m. He's good for another two 20 goal seasons. Absolutely no need to sell him now, the club is massively cashed up already.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Jatz will probably know more but i think he's gone downhill last couple of seasons.
He's been very ordinary for us. No big loss as far as I'm concerned.
 
Liverpool don't need to rebuild. They need Salah.
Completely disagree. Liverpool aren't currently competing at the pointy end and I'm not convinced that will change before Salah moves on.

Salah's production will naturally go down in the coming years. Keeping him is only papering over the cracks for another season.
 


As if an Italian club would ever pay the agreed buy clause. If in the unlikely event they were going to buy him it's very likely they'll put an an offer way under the buy option agreement.

Find it very suss that Lukako who turned down big pay days in Saudi would be agreeing a paycut on his remaining contract with Chelsea. Why would he help them out with all the 8 year contracts they are throwing about and Boehly spending massively? My take is clearlake is paying him off elsewhere to get him out of the club as he refuses to play in Saudi which is the only place that will meet his current wages.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

It would make me run a mile but I can't really see Pep (or most other managers) being bothered by a player refusing to train.

Mahrez I think was probably the last time this happened with us.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Liverpool should really take that.

I reckon that offer will still be there next year, we can plan for a replacement early in next summers window. Rather than do it now with little time left.
 
I reckon that offer will still be there next year, we can plan for a replacement early in next summers window. Rather than do it now with little time left.
Sure Nunez is now the greatest striker on earth, who needs Salah?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom