Remove this Banner Ad

Transfer Discussion Thread

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Wouldn't surprise if Arsenal could find the money they would. Could be the difference in winning the league for them

Given the structure of the Raya deal, which appears to be designed solely to shift the transfer fee into the next financial year for FFP purposes, I don't see Arsenal doing any big money deals in January.
 
Given the structure of the Raya deal, which appears to be designed solely to shift the transfer fee into the next financial year for FFP purposes, I don't see Arsenal doing any big money deals in January.

Sell Ramsdale plus a few others would help wouldn't it?
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Sell Ramsdale plus a few others would help wouldn't it?

I don't see Ramsdale being sold until the Raya deal is finalised next summer.

Other than that, Arsenal don't have any surplus players with any value. The Timber injury means there is no scope to sell a defender. Our midfield dept is Elneny and Jorginio. ESR could generate some money, but he is injured again, and I don't see much interest in Nelson or Eddie, given both were coming out of contract when they resigned.
 
ADL wanted £175m for him last summer, i dont see anyone touching atm. Will need to run down his contract.
Contract runs to 2025, yeah? So by next summer window he will have one year left? You’d think they cash in at the end of the season.
 

Remove this Banner Ad



If Arsenal, Liverpool, Chelsea, Man City etc can loan Neves for £x million, Newcastle should be able to as well.

There's already rules in place to ensure loan moves between associated parties are made at fair market value, that should be good enough.
 
If Arsenal, Liverpool, Chelsea, Man City etc can loan Neves for £x million, Newcastle should be able to as well.

There's already rules in place to ensure loan moves between associated parties are made at fair market value, that should be good enough.

Arsenal & Liverpool don't have the opportunity to buy a player from one of their umbrella clubs & loan them to help out with FFP.

These deals should be allowed but the club loaning must take a FFP hit for 1 years worth of amortisation plus wages. The FFP hit should be the same as if they were buying them.
 
Arsenal & Liverpool don't have the opportunity to buy a player from one of their umbrella clubs & loan them to help out with FFP.

These deals should be allowed but the club loaning must take a FFP hit for 1 years worth of amortisation plus wages. The FFP hit should be the same as if they were buying them.

Unless there is evidence that they are being blocked from loaning players from the Saudi League at fair market value, Arsenal and Liverpool have exactly the same opportunity as Newcastle currently do.

Making Newcastle take a hit on the purchase value of a player they are only loaning is just another way of trying to stop their progress, nothing else.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

If Arsenal, Liverpool, Chelsea, Man City etc can loan Neves for £x million, Newcastle should be able to as well.

There's already rules in place to ensure loan moves between associated parties are made at fair market value, that should be good enough.
Needs 14 club votes to stop it, probs wont go through anyway
 
Unless there is evidence that they are being blocked from loaning players from the Saudi League at fair market value, Arsenal and Liverpool have exactly the same opportunity as Newcastle currently do.
Pretty obvious a deal already in place for Toon to get Neves…probably always plan to replace Tonali. Can’t be serious that Arse and Pool have same opportunity
 
Pretty obvious a deal already in place for Toon to get Neves…probably always plan to replace Tonali. Can’t be serious that Arse and Pool have same opportunity
Perhaps they should make an enquiry.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top