Remove this Banner Ad

Transgender

  • Thread starter Thread starter Benny78
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Discussion continuing in Part 2 found here

 
How would you like transgender people to be treated in both society and on the sporting fields?
How would you? What would be your measure of acceptance?
 
Like everyone else is. Not forcing others to make special concessions based on their subjective experience.
And what special concessions have you been burdened with?
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

What special concessions are others forced to make?
I would imagine with sport and how it's split around gender lines?
Also other institutions like schools etc
Also that individual case of which bathrooms to use?
A lot of places differentiate on gender
 
Not in the eyes of many laws. I was issued a male Nsw birth certificate in 1965, in 2006 I was issued a female Nsw Birth Certificate.
The law unfortunately doesn't fully conform to facts in some instances.
 
How would you like transgender people to be treated in both society and on the sporting fields?
To be treated as folk with a mental illness. Not as SJW victims du jour.

I mean, c'mon. Transgenders represent less than 1% of the population and are the latest "victim" being championed by the cultural Marxists in their quest to destroy the Greco-Roman-Christian philosophical and cultural roots of normative Western society. White, heterosexual family values are anathema to these SJW zealots.

These folk needs psychiatric treatment. But no doubt will take part in women's teams in the Olympics.

The irony of it all re the feminazis is so funny.

Dr. Paul R. McHugh, the former psychiatrist-in-chief for Johns Hopkins Hospital and its current Distinguished Service Professor of Psychiatry, said that transgenderism is a “mental disorder” that merits treatment, that sex change is “biologically impossible,” and that "people who promote sexual reassignment surgery are collaborating with and promoting a mental disorder".
 
To be treated as folk with a mental illness. Not as SJW victims du jour.

I mean, c'mon. Transgenders represent less than 1% of the population and are the latest "victim" being championed by the cultural Marxists in their quest to destroy the Greco-Roman-Christian philosophical and cultural roots of normative Western society. White, heterosexual family values are anathema to these SJW zealots.

These folk needs psychiatric treatment. But no doubt will take part in women's teams in the Olympics.

The irony of it all re the feminazis is so funny.

Dr. Paul R. McHugh, the former psychiatrist-in-chief for Johns Hopkins Hospital and its current Distinguished Service Professor of Psychiatry, said that transgenderism is a “mental disorder” that merits treatment, that sex change is “biologically impossible,” and that "people who promote sexual reassignment surgery are collaborating with and promoting a mental disorder".

"Greco-Roman cultural roots" are probably not the best example you could use when talking about homosexuality, transexualism and transgenderism.
 
e Greco-Roman-Christian philosophical and cultural roots of normative Western society. White, heterosexual family values
are just subjective conditioning norms that are a relatively recent invention and manufactured artificially and no way the normal to the vast bulk of human history and experience.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

To be treated as folk with a mental illness. Not as SJW victims du jour.

.
Your kids and grand kids will read this and cringe.

Ironically they might excuse you because "that was just what people were taught at the time".



On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app
 
How would you like transgender people to be treated in both society and on the sporting fields?
To be treated as folk with a mental illness. Not as SJW victims du jour.

I mean, c'mon. Transgenders represent less than 1% of the population and are the latest "victim" being championed by the cultural Marxists in their quest to destroy the Greco-Roman-Christian philosophical and cultural roots of normative Western society. White, heterosexual family values are anathema to these SJW zealots.

Wow. Nobody wants to destroy anything. People deserve a fair go no matter their orientation. End of story. Doesn't matter if their interior gender matches their exterior one or not. As kirsti said earlier treating everyone with the same dignity and respect that we ourselves would like to be treated with is a start.

Apologies if this sounds self-righteous but I think to live in a world of decency, actual human decency, we need to let go of these social-exclusionary thoughts of times past.
 
Your kids and grand kids will read this and cringe.

Ironically they might excuse you because "that was just what people were taught at the time".



On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app
Some people just like to hate what they don't want to try to understand. It says oodles about them, and little about much else.
 
I see this thread has just reverted again to people trying make others feel shame for not agreeing with them on this rather than addressing arguments they have no answer for.

Heck Gough flat out knows the contradictory positions he holds are untenable so has just dodged the same question several times.

Kirsti seems to take the position of "Am I out of touch? No it's the Doctors who are wrong."

The whole argument I am seeing come from another side of this issue actually has no scientific basis and seems to be "lets be nice to these disadvantaged people that we have pity for" and "you are all arseholes if you disagree".

Would anyone like to answer whether a person who was born biologically male who believes they are female but still maintains the advantages male bone structure should be able to compete in a weightlifting contest under the womens division and smash a bunch of records?
 
Nice emotionally abusive shaming tactic with a total lack of argument as usual. Quite cowardly actually.

I see noone gives a shit about women who have trained for years to compete in a weightlifting contest being destroyed by a competitor with a biologically advantageous bone structure.

Are the people that support the injustice faced by those female competitors arseholes?
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Nice emotionally abusive shaming tactic with a total lack of argument as usual. Quite cowardly actually.

I see noone gives a shit about women who have trained for years to compete in a weightlifting contest being destroyed by a competitor with a biologically advantageous bone structure.

Are the people that support the injustice faced by those female competitors arseholes?
Maybe, but I'm also right. It took people coming out for others to realise that gay people are no different to them, this will also happen with trans people in the years to come, and attitudes like yours will be considered antiquated, and bigoted.
 
Wow. Nobody wants to destroy anything. People deserve a fair go no matter their orientation. End of story. Doesn't matter if their interior gender matches their exterior one or not. As kirsti said earlier treating everyone with the same dignity and respect that we ourselves would like to be treated with is a start.

Apologies if this sounds self-righteous but I think to live in a world of decency, actual human decency, we need to let go of these social-exclusionary thoughts of times past.
So you're advocating the abolition of all womens-only spaces and activities?
 
What special concessions are others forced to make?
I already described a situation where a colleague of mine was bullied by a transgender woman for not using the correct pronouns (threat of job loss, etc). Thankfully the transgender woman, who caused more grief through her solipsistic view of the world than anyone else and was a fraudulent malingerer was moved on.
 
Kirsti seems to take the position of "Am I out of touch? No it's the Doctors who are wron
I already described a situation where a colleague of mine was bullied by a transgender woman for not using the correct pronouns (threat of job loss, etc). Thankfully the transgender woman, who caused more grief through her solipsistic view of the world than anyone else and was a fraudulent malingerer was moved on.
Since 2002 the transgender community have been protected in the workplace as such it is against the law to use incorrect pronouns or mimic the walk or talk of another transgender employee. I suggest you former trans co-worker was not the bully in this case more then likely the woman that that refused to use the correct pro nouns was doing the bullying.
 
Kirsti seems to take the position of "Am I out of touch? No it's the Doctors who are wron
Since 2002 the transgender community have been protected in the workplace as such it is against the law to use incorrect pronouns or mimic the walk or talk of another transgender employee. I suggest you former trans co-worker was not the bully in this case more then likely the woman that that refused to use the correct pro nouns was doing the bullying.
The person involved was Chinese and had less than perfect grasp of English. He had no idea what he had done wrong. The company eventually twigged that the trans person involved spent most of their time policing other people's language in between taking sick days.

Screw the law - as Sally McManus said, some times workers should break unjust laws.
 
This will never happen. The typical heterosexual person will not tolerate fraudulent representations of sex, given that most people want children and working sex organs are a fundamental requirement for that to happen. Few people want to be with a eunuch in a dress.

Of course in the trans community, this is bigotry, as even lesbians who refuse to have sex with pre-op transgender women are called transmisogynists. Funny that lesbians typically don't like penises.
I take great personal offence to you referring to trans people as being eunuchs in a dress, I have reported your.post.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top