tugga
Hall of Famer
- May 9, 2006
- 36,877
- 75,432
- AFL Club
- Richmond
- Other Teams
- Tottenham,NY Rangers,Red Sox, SA Spurs
It depends on what you mean by slight upgrades for younger players.Once again you didn't read it properly, the only way we could fit Cloke into our salary cap is because of the massive hole in our list from our top end players to our bottom 10-15 players.
We have Martin, Riewoldt and Cotchin who are 2-4 years away from there prime and truly commanding of contracts worth 500-600k a year, and when there next contract negotiations come up the only one who could make a case for a larger slice of the pie is Cotchin.
And as I already stated, the young ones such as Conca, Ellis, Batchelor, Griffiths etc, these guys will only receive slight upgrades, nothing in the vicinity as our top liners.
If Collingwood can sign up all of Thomas, Pendelbury, Swan, Sidebottom and Beams to big $s especially the first 3 then I see no reason why as to why we couldn't fit Cloke into our cap.
Ellis, for instance, would be on minimum wage, which for a 1st year player I think I around 70k. Do you honestly think his next contract would be signed off for anything less than $150k? That's twice what he is getting now.
Martin is already earning good coin and yes he would have knocked back a massive offer from elsewhere, but he is still not getting paid unders.
You need to pay players what they worth or more than what they are worth to either keep or entice them, not less than what they are worth. Yes,players will sacrifice a massive increase to stay with a club, but they won't accept unders. Nobody does.
There's a difference between being loyal and being stupid or on the other hand, from the club's point of view, treating players with contempt.





