Remove this Banner Ad

Opinion Travis Varcoe

Assuming Varcoe is worth pick 10 in any draft, would you trade him?

  • Yes

    Votes: 48 39.7%
  • No

    Votes: 30 24.8%
  • Get stuffed Meto

    Votes: 43 35.5%

  • Total voters
    121

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

How about you grow up and realize we're allowed to discuss pros and cons of players on this board?

Go on any other forums and it's the same thing.

This isn't Disneyland.


JubJub and the other Varcoe disciples usually club together at such times when their idol comes under scrutiny, they do their best to control the forum, been going on for years.
 
Almost certainly because we lost and people want some blood letting when we lose. Though his 14 possessions and 2 goals is not the key figure, it is the 0 possessions in the first quarter when the game was decided that has tipped me over the edge.

And the fact we lost a game because we were bullied out of it and he is our weakest player when it comes to body contact.
But to focus only on the negative, as so many of you do, is not the key figure either.
Why could he not get near the ball in Q1?
How many times has he blitzed in Q1, then faded out of games for even 2Q? Then attack again in Q4. That has happened. Some just love to get stuck into him and are marred by his poor Q, and disregard any semblance of improvement.
If he was a 4Q player, he wouldn't be Travis Varcoe- just what he is you'll have to accept while MC sees him good enough for best 22.
 
Last edited:
Why assume that he is immune? And don't say because he hasn't been omitted. A very plausible (if not likely) explanation is that it has been discussed many times and at great length but the outcome of those discussion has always been to persist with him for a range of reasons. That doesn't make him immune.
He still offers quality possessions, and does things that the antagonists choose to disregard, and he OBVIOUSLY has a role in our team that has not been appreciated by many of the BF experts. Gut running.
Not all players can do it , and at times, Trav has been less than effective, but at all times, he is trying.
 
He's been a passenger in two thirds of all the games he's ever played. It's just that we've been able to carry him until the last couple of years.
No I'm not a hater, I want him to be good, it's just that he goes completely missing for really long periods of the game and you have no idea where he is or what he's doing.
Why not do a Trav Cam, and watch him, and only him, for a single game this year, and actually see what he is doing, what his role might be, if you don't know.
Then watch the game on replay if you're pissed off at having done Trav Cam.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

He's only got the one problem as far as I can see,.....he whimps contested ball, and that's not good, never will be!
 
He's only got the one problem as far as I can see,.....he whimps contested ball, and that's not good, never will be!
You think CS of all coaches would tolerate a player who does what you suggest?
You think TV has some hold over CS that allows him to play despite wimping out on contested ball?
 
You think CS of all coaches would tolerate a player who does what you suggest?
You think TV has some hold over CS that allows him to play despite wimping out on contested ball?

I don't like saying anyone's a wimp, that's why I left it to last but I see it clearly watching him play, maybe I'm hallucinating but I don't think I'm on my own here.
Possibly CS is told we need his run and carry, and all the crap that goes with that stuff, but not much good if you're only getting it 10 times.
He managed a couple over the back last week (good), but it's his non-involvement in the contested that shouldn't be tolerated imo.
 
*They're

See, it's forum members like yourself who don't post your opinion through fear of ridicule. Plenty of people have been correct on Varcoe for years! It seems to me that only post his miss in the Preliminary final are people off the wagon and joining the new herd of sheep.

The fact that only 20% on here would take the top 10 draft choice for Varcoe (at Aug 2013) shows how clueless most of you are / were.

You're the first person who has accused me of not posting my opinions...I post my opinions regularly…it's not my fault you don't read them. Perhaps you're too busy reading your own?

By labeling others who don't share your views on subjects as "clueless" indicates you value your own opinions very highly. It's possible that there's a number of people on here who value your opinions almost as highly you do, though I wouldn't wish to speculate on just how many that number represents.

I'd prefer to refrain from indulging in puerile name calling. It adds no weight to mature discussion of issues in any forum I'm aware of. Just my ……opinion :)



Oh…..and thanks for the English correction btw..:oops:…unusual for me to miss such an obvious error. (auto-correct maybe?)…..I appreciate that such important issues on a football forum shouldn't be overlooked.
 
That website continues to amuse and bemuse.

http://www.footywire.com/afl/footy/tr-geelong-cats?year=2014&rt=TT&st=GO

Ranking of total goalkickers from Geelong in 2014:

Hawkins - 21
Bartel - 11
Murdoch - 9
Johnson - 8
Horlin-Smith - 8
Varcoe - 8

Equal 4th.


Beserker26 was one goal out….crucify him.

So Varcoe has kicked 8 goals so far this year…….so if he maintains this rate (even though he is playing like shit according to the anti-Varcoe circle jerkers) he would manage 22 goals through the H&A matches. If our coaches can lift his performance and conversion ( because even his detractors, or at least some of them see there is improvement in Varcoe) he could end up kicking say 30 goals for the season.?? Lets hope he can.

An earlier poster suggested that with the return of Motlop and Christensen, Varcoe could be best exploited as a small defensive forward who can kick goals. That's probably where he can do his best work.

Scott hinted that personnel would be looked at over the coming week. If that is the case, Varcoe's place in the team will be looked at, and his KPI's assessed. We don't know here what they are, but if he hasn't met the expectations of the Coach and MC, then he will indeed be sent to the VFL to improve the skills necessary to meet the role they want him to perform.

Seems pretty straight forward to me.
 
this thread is the ride that never ends and goes round and round and round and round........

merry-go-round.jpg
The Carousel Trap from Saw VI might have been more appropriate.
 
JubJub and the other Varcoe disciples usually club together at such times when their idol comes under scrutiny, they do their best to control the forum, been going on for years.

Control the forum? What nonsense.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Generally speaking, he's the only thing we really disagree on, so it does make for an interesting subject :)

Yes mate I fully agree, I know what'd do it for me, if he ran straight lines then I'd be real happy and he'd get his 20+.:thumbsu:
 
JubJub and the other Varcoe disciples usually club together at such times when their idol comes under scrutiny, they do their best to control the forum, been going on for years.

Well, they hand over their hard earned to the guy through this sponsorship thing... Are you really surprised??
 
Last edited:

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Was put up for trade and attracted little interest- what does that say?.

he runs past the ball too often - he doesn't keep it in front of him (football 101) you don't see that reflected in stats. His run and carry is becomming less important now because I don't think he is as quick as he once was. He's a good kick for goal - that's a plus but in my mind one or two decent games a year is not enough to carry him through the rest. Has he ever been in the best 3 on the ground - ever had a brownlow vote?

I don't doubt he tries hard - but I agree with most punters here that suggest he shirks the contest too often - and in the modern game you cannot have players that do that.

He needs an extended stay in the VFL.
 
How about you grow up and realize we're allowed to discuss pros and cons of players on this board?

Go on any other forums and it's the same thing.

Exactly. If all the criticisms were "Varcoe is shit" etc. it's a valid point. But pretty much none say that. Most if not all are simply saying he should have to regain form in the VFL just like any other player should. The problem is, it now seems that there's a glass ceiling with some players will simply never be dropped. That's can't be a positive thing.

If Varcoe played the next 2 games in the VFL, and got 30 touches both weeks and kicked 2 goals (or something similar), I'd almost insist he comes back to the seniors. But for some reason, to even suggest he might have to join others there results in hysteria and childishness.

Every player should be subject to scrutiny. Every player should be critically analysed. Without exception. A guy called JOEL COREY played VFL last year. I'm sure he could have come straight back to the seniors, but he probably realised he needed the hitout and was professional enough to do it without fuss. If he could do it, so can anyone else.
 
But to focus only on the negative, as so many of you do, is not the key figure either.
Why could he not get near the ball in Q1?
How many times has he blitzed in Q1, then faded out of games for even 2Q? Then attack again in Q4. That has happened. Some just love to get stuck into him and are marred by his poor Q, and disregard any semblance of improvement.
If he was a 4Q player, he wouldn't be Travis Varcoe- just what he is you'll have to accept while MC sees him good enough for best 22.
Wasn't on the ground till there was only 5 1/2 mins left of the first qTR. HAD TO WATCH THE REPLAY AS WAS CONFUSED ABOUT THIS MYSELF.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom