Except for at least the last two days or so.
News to me, who would that be?
in regards to Pell, if anybody ever makes a case against him that holds water he will be found guilty meaning he actually is a pedo and I would hope he dies in prison.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Except for at least the last two days or so.
News to me, who would that be?
in regards to Pell, if anybody ever makes a case against him that holds water he will be found guilty meaning he actually is a pedo and I would hope he dies in prison.
"It's a bit embarrassing to have a gormless happy clapper and Family First candidate involved with our club" was a bit of a thing.
"We're failing because Shaun Hart is a Christian" was never a thing at all.
Why would it be embarrassing?
well yeah if he is i'm wrong.Which has already happened. And by the way, he would still be a pedo if it hadn't.
So what years did you go to BCS? I was '86-'97.
If a civil case is brought against Pell and he is found to be (on the balance of probability) guilty of sexually abusing children would you also hold this opinion?News to me, who would that be?
in regards to Pell, if anybody ever makes a case against him that holds water he will be found guilty meaning he actually is a pedo and I would hope he dies in prison.
yeahIf a civil case is brought against Pell and he is found to be (on the balance of probability) guilty of sexually abusing children would you also hold this opinion?
If you have to ask, you'll never know.
If a civil case is brought against Pell and he is found to be (on the balance of probability) guilty of sexually abusing children would you also hold this opinion?
Thanks. I'll remember to answer all questions about the world my children ask me the exact same helpful way. That'll make society a better, more understanding place.
Jesus man, I wasn't trying to give you Dad lessons.
If you don't think having a gormless happy clapper and Family First candidate employed by our club is embarrassing on the face of it, obviously we'll just agree to disagree on that. Good luck to you.
No, I don't give a s**t if a religious person is employed at the club, nor will I assume he's 100% on board with all the parties policies of whom he ran for.
Are you also embarrassed Warren Tredrea worked with Ben Perkins?
lol really? Because that’s kind of what being a candidate for a party involves.
No, but Wazza sure as hell should be.
News to me, who would that be?
in regards to Pell, if anybody ever makes a case against him that holds water he will be found guilty meaning he actually is a pedo and I would hope he dies in prison.
The binary guilty / not-guilty is a shortfall of the justice system IMO. Whilst people should obviously only go to gaol (fined, whatever is the sentence) if guilty, there should be options of innocent and 'unable to determine guilt or innocence' (or similar).He hasn't been found to be innocent though.
The binary guilty / not-guilty is a shortfall of the justice system IMO. Whilst people should obviously only go to gaol (fined, whatever is the sentence) if guilty, there should be options of innocent and 'unable to determine guilt or innocence' (or similar).
Doubling down on pedo defending is the new TRTT high water mark. Sorry piston broke.
No, they determine guilty or not-guilty. Not-guilty does not mean innocent in all cases. Almost everyone who gets off a charge claims they are innocent, but that isn't what was determined. Often it's going to be they are innocent, but if it was guilty, not-guilty and innocent as the three options it'd be clearer that the choices are someone did 'it', there's not enough evidence one way or the other, someone didn't do 'it'.Isn’t that why we have judges and juries?
Don’t they determine guilt or innocence based on evidence?
Isn’t that why we have judges and juries?
Don’t they determine guilt or innocence based on evidence?
The evidence against Pell was entirely circumstantial though. It came down to who the jury believed.
The jury didn’t believe the pedo
The judges did
right?