- Banned
- #1,051
I did it 10 years ago. Marcel was the online creep’s name that time. Taught me never to use my real name online again.I think the view of 'good' and 'bad' science, actually comes down to a lack of understanding.
Yes, there are good and poor practitioners in all areas. But majority consensus helps to reduce, to almost eliminate, that aspect.
Your anecdote about the Great Barrier Reef isn't actually looking at the science. Your issue is with headlines, talking points, and misinformation.
If you'd spent time looking at the science, you'd have a better understanding as to what's happening to the the GBR, how and why it's happening, and why your observations of segments of it are not comparable to the 'science'.
For example, can you point to a scientific report on the GBR that you can contradict?