Bender_
X
Would have gone the shirtless Brownlow look for the tribunal cross.
I imagine he'd speak about himself in the third person.
"Fyfe pleads not guilty!"
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Would have gone the shirtless Brownlow look for the tribunal cross.
I imagine he'd speak about himself in the third person.
"Fyfe pleads not guilty!"
I'd imagine he would pull out his phone and press play on a video, which he would hold up to the camera. It would be a fresh upload to his site, Fyfe7.com
The first 30 seconds of the video would be career highlights, shots of him at home and subliminal images of "not guilty" flashing, with his soon to be released debut single playing in the background.
It would end with a male voiceover whispering "Not guilty, Fyfe7.com".
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
I'd imagine he would pull out his phone and press play on a video, which he would hold up to the camera. It would be a fresh upload to his site, Fyfe7.com
The first 30 seconds of the video would be career highlights, shots of him at home and subliminal images of "not guilty" flashing, with his soon to be released debut single playing in the background.
It would end with a male voiceover whispering "Not guilty, Fyfe7.com".
I think there are a few players ahead of him that need delisting this year (in my opinion). Don't be surprised if he stays on the list as get the feeling that Simmo likes what he sees - just his skills need a bit of polish but he's no Robinson Crusoe there. How old is Tunbridge by the way? I like the mongrel in him - he just needs to curb it a bit so he doesn't get suspended.Shame for the guy, may actually be the end of his career sadly. Just as he was starting to get games
Yes agree - like Barry Hall getting off for a strike when he was due to play in the GF the following week back in 2005/2006 (not sure which year it was - all I know is that he shouldn't have been playing in that GF). Think it may have been 2005 as the AFL were desperate for Sydney Swans to win a GF to increase the market in NSW.If you trust the AFL to make decisions based on fairness and precedent, then you are a crazier person than me. All about which teams/players are thier most marketable and who the media makes a beat up about.
Screwed by one of the two charges.He's accepted it, meaning not available to the prelim (all things going well...)
It was 2005. Its faded a bit of course with the time, but there was a massive narrative about Sydney winning and breaking the drought that year.Yes agree - like Barry Hall getting off for a strike when he was due to play in the GF the following week back in 2005/2006 (not sure which year it was - all I know is that he shouldn't have been playing in that GF). Think it may have been 2005 as the AFL were desperate for Sydney Swans to win a GF to increase the market in NSW.
I honestly feel for the umpires with this rule. It's almost impossible to adjudicate. A player gets tackled... a). did he have prior opportunity? b). did he dispose of it correctly? c). did he "make an attempt" to dispose of it? d). was the tackle dangerous? e). is the player a "good bloke"?Yeah the entire scene afterwards basically signed and sealed Tunbridge's suspension. Just as baffling is it wasn't a free kick at the time.