Remove this Banner Ad

Twitter

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Scallop Industry Thug said:
Bruce you didn’t even bother with the Dorsey thing.

Smart lad.


Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
Click to expand...
Your case is disingenuous. You’re pretending there has been no political censorship on Twitter.

I’ve been down this road before on here. Do the legwork. Gather the evidence. Make the case. Then get either banned or piled on by your mob of progressive mates.

It’s a waste of time. You are a waste of time.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

BruceFromBalnarring said:
Your case is disingenuous. You’re pretending there has been no political censorship on Twitter.

I’ve been down this road before on here. Do the legwork. Gather the evidence. Make the case. Then get either banned or piled on by your mob of progressive mates.

It’s a waste of time. You are a waste of time.
Click to expand...

If you think asking for evidence is piling on, then you lack resilience.

You actually tried to provide evidence but only half heartedly as you knew it would be tonked back over your head.

With the Saudis having Musk by the plums, we may see it soon.



Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
 
Scallop Industry Thug said:
If you think asking for evidence is piling on, then you lack resilience.

You actually tried to provide evidence but only half heartedly as you knew it would be tonked back over your head.

With the Saudis having Musk by the plums, we may see it soon.



Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
Click to expand...
No. I didn’t say that. And you mustn’t be from around here if you think I lack resilience.

But your disingenuous mischaracterisation of what I wrote simply proves my point.

You are a waste of time.
 
BruceFromBalnarring said:
No. I didn’t say that. And you mustn’t be from around here if you think I lack resilience.

But your disingenuous mischaracterisation of what I wrote simply proves my point.

You are a waste of time.
Click to expand...

Again Bruce, another post without the evidence of something you claim exists.

Provide evidence of political censorship, or continue mushing away on the keyboard.


Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
 
Scallop Industry Thug said:
Again Bruce, another post without the evidence of something you claim exists.

Provide evidence of political censorship, or continue mushing away on the keyboard.


Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
Click to expand...
**** me! The Hunter Biden laptop story. They literally banned an entire newspaper in the lead up to a presidential election!
 
BruceFromBalnarring said:
* me! The Hunter Biden laptop story. They literally banned an entire newspaper in the lead up to a presidential election!
Click to expand...

Haha again with the laptop. They decided to stand by a Giuliani garbage story with potentially hacked info.

If any of you types showed the slightest bit of critical thinking, people might believe more of what you say.

But if Musk can rely on Saudi dollars rather ads, more of your dumb shit might get through.




Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
 
Scallop Industry Thug said:
Haha again with the laptop. They decided to stand by a Giuliani garbage story with potentially hacked info.

If any of you types showed the slightest bit of critical thinking, people might believe more of what you say.

But if Musk can rely on Saudi dollars rather ads, more of your dumb s**t might get through.




Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
Click to expand...
Sorry? Are you now saying that the content of Hunter Biden’s laptop were faked?
 

Remove this Banner Ad

BruceFromBalnarring said:
Sorry? Are you now saying that the content of Hunter Biden’s laptop were faked?
Click to expand...

Lol. Minimal chain of custody. Files written and copied. Russia, Giuliani, bannon. Nah, there is nothing credible there.

The campaigner was a coke and hookers loser who will skate by. Like the trumps.




Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
 
bourbons said:
Are you? :drunk:

I read the article you posted. Quote the part that is "inciting riots" if you would?

Smart move ignoring the other post noting all the differences between Trump and Waters' activity on twitter, by the way.
Click to expand...
So we get the benchmark right, can you quote the tweet that Trump sent that incited January 6 (one unarmed protester shot by police).
 
Scallop Industry Thug said:
Lol. Minimal chain of custody. Files written and copied. Russia, Giuliani, bannon. Nah, there is nothing credible there.

The campaigner was a coke and hookers loser who will skate by. Like the trumps.




Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
Click to expand...

I don't like him either but he appears quite bright on a number of issues.

He seems to be supporting Ukraine significantly too and trolling Russians bosses via twitter about getting slaughtered.

Far from a flash in the pan. Half of Melbourne seem to drive a telsa
 
Marcel Proust said:
I don't like him either but he appears quite bright on a number of issues.

He seems to be supporting Ukraine significantly too and trolling Russians bosses via twitter about getting slaughtered.

Far from a flash in the pan. Half of Melbourne seem to drive a telsa
Click to expand...

He got swindled on this deal. Forced to charge subscription. And in debt to Saudis.


Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

BruceFromBalnarring said:
Oh hello. Now you’re an expert in corporate takeovers? [emoji23]
Click to expand...

Cmon Bruce. You’re flapping around.

You claimed censorship and have proven nothing.

Your thoughts on giving Saudi’s part ownership of a private company with no oversight of board of directors?


Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
 
BruceFromBalnarring said:
So we get the benchmark right, can you quote the tweet that Trump sent that incited January 6 (one unarmed protester shot by police).
Click to expand...
Sounds like you're shifting the goal posts a bit there, knackers. Your initial claim was that the article you provided confirmed that dems had "incited BLM riots" - you're backing away from that now, I take it? Again, smart move, although fairly bizarre to post it in the first place.

As to you benchmark, here you go -> Trump Twitter Archive

Just about every post from election day through to Jan 6, and note here that he still wouldn't have been banned had Jan 6 not turned out like it did. Again - context. You seem utterly incapable of acknowledging any.

Now, your turn - list Waters' tweets and any events resultant from her video that should have seen her banned as well, please.
 
bourbons said:
Sounds like you're shifting the goal posts a bit there, knackers. Your initial claim was that the article you provided confirmed that dems had "incited BLM riots" - you're backing away from that now, I take it? Again, smart move, although fairly bizarre to post it in the first place.

As to you benchmark, here you go -> Trump Twitter Archive

Just about every post from election day through to Jan 6, and note here that he still wouldn't have been banned had Jan 6 not turned out like it did. Again - context. You seem utterly incapable of acknowledging any.

Now, your turn - list Waters' tweets and any events resultant from her video that should have seen her banned as well, please.
Click to expand...
Which tweet advocates violence?
 
BruceFromBalnarring said:
What came before it? Liar.
Click to expand...
What? This?

"I’ve been down this road before on here. Do the legwork. Gather the evidence. Make the case."

This legwork and evidence would be the article you posted? The one that you claim was dems "inciting BLM riots" that you're now backing slowly away from, Homer into the hedge style?

Any time you'd like to clarify exactly what it is you're saying, go right ahead.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom