Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The original results were trace amounts too and he passed tests before and after that test aswell. The argument was the same that time that it was so low as to not have any benefit IIRC..
He's lost any credibility for me to give him any benefit of the doubt. May be innocent this time but I won't be shedding any tears for him if it turns out the majority of fight fans are wrongly assuming guilt here..
OK so it seems we have differing opinions on the trustworthiness of USADA.I get that, but why would he be punished for the same thing twice? They have said that they are satisfied that the substance has not been ingested again.
I don't claim to be an expert on PEDs but all that Im reading is that Turinabol can be cleared from the system in weeks and at a maximum a couple of months.
That's not taking into consideration if the drug is being micro dosed.
Who knows for sure though.
Have always liked your posts so don’t intend to start an argument. My issue is with Jon Jones and USADA having little credibility in my eyes.Taken from https://www.bjpenn.com/mma-news/ufc...8hfIL6_14FbtqespGfxVvXXXJEZgRzgNrbY0j2KOtin4U
To be clear, this ‘atypical finding’ does not represent a failed drug test for Jon Jones.
UFC VP of Athlete Health and Performance Jeff Novitzky told MMAjunkie that this blip on Jones’s test is likely the result of something called “pulsing” rather than his recent ingestion of a banned substance. Novitzky says the the amount of turinabol detected on this Jon Jones test is equivalent to a “picogram.”
“A picogram is a one-trillionth of a gram,” Novitzky told MMAjunkie. “If you put one grain of salt on the table and split it up into 50 million pieces, a picogram is one of those pieces of that gram of salt. These levels have shown up in the single and double digits of picograms – so such a small amount.”
“There’s been no violation of the anti-doping program,” Novitzky added. “He’s been cleared to fight in terms of the USADA program. … USADA fully analyzed it internally. They reached out to outside experts from around the world. They reached out to another sports league that has seen the same issue. And all of them, independent of us, determined that this was not a reingestion of the substance and this very, very small amount that was occurring and still showing up, according to these expects from around the world, did not provide any performance-enhancing benefit.
“Not much is known about this longterm metabolite. The parent compound is not approved for human use anywhere in the world … but what both USADA and other entities are seeing is that a recurrence, or potential ‘pulsing,’ where you have multiple negative tests and then a positive one for a very low amount – they’re seeing that quite commonly over time. And no one knows how long this could last – it could potentially last forever (in Jones’ system).”
Have always liked your posts so don’t intend to start an argument. My issue is with Jon Jones and USADA having little credibility in my eyes.
You seem to have done some research which I respect. Novitski and USADA may be right here. I really don’t know enough apart from what I’ve read to come to any hard and fast conclusions other than to say I have serious doubts and am unwilling to believe what official sources are saying straight off the bat.
I don't know enough about USADA/WADA/ASADA etc, but have there been other occurrences similar to this where an athlete has positive stemming from a previous suspension?
Just wondering if another athelte had a positive test whether they would be given the same leniency?
I've done no research and comment comes from pure assumption, but i would have thought anyone with anything in there system regardless of amount shouldn't be permitted to fight? What consitutes an amount that isn't deemed performance enhancing?
Just very muddy and murky.
Regardless of whether it was fair or not, absolute disgrace the event has been moved. Zero justification for it IMO.
Tom Lawlor got caught for picograms in his system and he was banned for 2 years.I don't know enough about USADA/WADA/ASADA etc, but have there been other occurrences similar to this where an athlete has positive stemming from a previous suspension?
Just wondering if another athelte had a positive test whether they would be given the same leniency?
I've done no research and comment comes from pure assumption, but i would have thought anyone with anything in there system regardless of amount shouldn't be permitted to fight? What consitutes an amount that isn't deemed performance enhancing?
Just very muddy and murky.
Regardless of whether it was fair or not, absolute disgrace the event has been moved. Zero justification for it IMO.
Full of s**t
They microdose...everyone knows this
So what they're saying is it's a millionth of a grain of sand they've detected that's stayed in the fat in his body from 2017
He Has had multiple tests since then and passed, he then cut weight and the micrograin has now moved into his blood due to weight cutting etc for the up coming fight and theyve detected it
So what they're saying is they know there's no chance it's a new grain of sand since 2017 and is one that laid dormant in his body fat for a year
all we need now is Jones to pull out of the fight for some reason
I think Nunes has power that should relate to 145. Cyborg likes to stand in the pocket and trade too. The question is will her chin stand up to Cyborg's power IMO.Still think Cyborg Nunes is gonna be mad, going under the radar.
Cracking match-up. I think Nunes can get it done..Still think Cyborg Nunes is gonna be mad, going under the radar.