Thread starter
#1
The recent decision to pay, generally what is reffered to as 'tiggy-touchwood' penalties against players for minor 'holding' offences, has got to be the biggest load of beauraucratic, over-regulating crap seen for the last few years.
Head of umpiring, Jeff Geischen, has even estimated that the decision could see up to 50 or 60 extra free kicks per game.
As far as I'm concerned, a player should only be awarded a free kick if he is unfairly impinged, and/or ******ed from being able to access the ball.
Why the hell do we need free kicks "that we don't need"? This is just another step which will see our game over regulated.
Head of umpiring, Jeff Geischen, has even estimated that the decision could see up to 50 or 60 extra free kicks per game.
As far as I'm concerned, a player should only be awarded a free kick if he is unfairly impinged, and/or ******ed from being able to access the ball.
Why the hell do we need free kicks "that we don't need"? This is just another step which will see our game over regulated.
