- Jul 26, 2020
- 11,342
- 31,511
- AFL Club
- Port Adelaide
Does this part of the score review process need to be looked at?
Why, when the goal umpire is unsure of what has transpired and asks for a video review, does it then get passed back to them when the review is inconclusive?
The guy has said "I don't know for sure" yet the final decision is passed back to them anyway.
Yes, the technology used in the process is incredibly poor but I think you need to live by it.
When the evidence is inconclusive that it hit the post, then it should be a goal. If the evidence that it was touched is inconclusive, then it should be a goal.
Please scrap this passing the buck nonsense.
Why, when the goal umpire is unsure of what has transpired and asks for a video review, does it then get passed back to them when the review is inconclusive?
The guy has said "I don't know for sure" yet the final decision is passed back to them anyway.
Yes, the technology used in the process is incredibly poor but I think you need to live by it.
When the evidence is inconclusive that it hit the post, then it should be a goal. If the evidence that it was touched is inconclusive, then it should be a goal.
Please scrap this passing the buck nonsense.