Remove this Banner Ad

Umpires that don’t know the rules

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

The Feeder Club

Premium Platinum
Joined
Sep 8, 2023
Posts
2,878
Reaction score
8,064
AFL Club
Fremantle
Umpiring is obviously interpretative and so difficult but you surely can't umpire at the elite level if you don't know the rules.
In the last 15 seconds today Holmes played on immediately before the umpire had even signalled a point, let alone reached for his flag. But the controlling umpire does nothing and play proceeds. Lucky it didn't change the outcome.
This isn't an interpretation issue, it's black and white incompetence isn't it? Not sure who the umpire was, but he needs a spell
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

There are different interpretations that will always be there in our sport, I am talking about something a bit different though. This isn't an interpretation issue, there is nothing to interpret - you simply can't play on like Holmes did. It's an umpire that either doesn't know the rule or is too scared to enforce the rule. Either way he shouldn't be umpiring at this level
 
There are different interpretations that will always be there in our sport, I am talking about something a bit different though. This isn't an interpretation issue, there is nothing to interpret - you simply can't play on like Holmes did. It's an umpire that either doesn't know the rule or is too scared to enforce the rule. Either way he shouldn't be umpiring at this level
That umpire should be dropped by the AFL will let it go
 
Of the list of 42 field umpires this year they can be put in to four categories;

Good: Brett Rosebury, Matt Stevic, Brendan Hosking, Simon Meredith

Incompetent: The other 36 that haven't been named individually

Absolute disgrace to the game: Matthew Nicholls, Eleni Tee

Haven't debuted yet: Sam Morgan, Jordyn Pearson - can't be much good if they can't even get a game ahead of Nicholls and Eleni.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
End of the first quarter in the Saints vs Port game, a Port shot after the siren and a Power player clearly punches the ball over the line. Somehow the field umpires, goal umpire and ARC don't register that it's not allowed, and the score stands.

16.5 SCORING A GOAL OR BEHIND AFTER PLAY HAS ENDED
16.5.2 Football Touched in Transit
A Behind shall still be recorded under Law 16.5.1 if the football is touched in transit by another Player, provided the field Umpire is satisfied that the scoring of the Behind was not assisted by a Player from the same Team.
 
End of the first quarter in the Saints vs Port game, a Port shot after the siren and a Power player clearly punches the ball over the line. Somehow the field umpires, goal umpire and ARC don't register that it's not allowed, and the score stands.

16.5 SCORING A GOAL OR BEHIND AFTER PLAY HAS ENDED
16.5.2 Football Touched in Transit
A Behind shall still be recorded under Law 16.5.1 if the football is touched in transit by another Player, provided the field Umpire is satisfied that the scoring of the Behind was not assisted by a Player from the same Team.
Yeah what was going on there.

They'll wait until it ****s up a result before doing anything.

Classic reactive AFL.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Dogs v Swans - they’re having a shocker - not paying highs, paying highs when players duck into it

Zero consistency
Not sure how we can expect consistency when there are 4 umpires. Two people can look at the same incident and have diametrically opposed opinions as to what occurred. Imagine the discrepancy among 4 people.

I've always been bemused by what ruck men can/cannot do. Last night I saw a bulldog player take front position, Grundy was behind. As the ball was thrown in, the Bulldog player jumped, and as he did, Grundy just pushed him aside and won the ball. This used to be an infringement, apparently, it's not now. I'm one who doesn't criticize umpires/umpiring very much because I have no idea what the rules are anymore. :)
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom