Remove this Banner Ad

Roast Umpires thread

  • Thread starter Thread starter Groupie_
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

The first "studs up" and the "Rioli push in the back" are up their with the free kick to Brisbane against Scott Thompson!!
Awful decisions.

Was the so called Rioli push in the back the same flog umpire who pinged Riewoldt?
 
Last edited:
Mollison had an absolute shocker. Besides the Caddy-Rioli f up and the Riewoldt studs up f up, he was also the bloke who missed the clear Soldo kicking in danger free from 10 feet away which one of the other umpires (thankfully) managed to pick out from 50 feet away.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

Mollison had an absolute shocker. Besides the Caddy-Rioli f up and the Riewoldt studs up f up, he was also the bloke who missed the clear Soldo kicking in danger free from 10 feet away which one of the other umpires (thankfully) managed to pick out from 50 feet away.

was he also the ump nearby that didn't blow the whistle when lunch marked it in front of goals?
 

Basically have admitted that the rule was set up incorrectly, umpires were right but we were wrong.....a stupid rule change that was never needed to be made.

Good on Dimma for having a crack at em, pity it was us (again) who were on the wrong end
 
The clowns have spoke running a circus nothing more ,we always cop these controversial decisions.

The bloke in charge of the rules commitee pushed for higher scoring in games yet we've had clubs over the past 2 weeks lucky to score a lousy goal in a half of footy sack them all.
 
Basically.....fu** the umps......we still find a way to win and come finals time when the whistle is put away (looking at you Colonwood) we come into our own.

Exactly right, we were last for free kicks in 2017 when we won the flag, and again in 2018 when we finished 2 games clear plus percentage on top of the ladder.

Unlike Collingwood, West Coast and the Bulldogs, who all rely on umpire assistance, we still find ways to win games, even with the umpires playing their grand final against us week in, week out.
 

Basically have admitted that the rule was set up incorrectly, umpires were right but we were wrong.....a stupid rule change that was never needed to be made.

Good on Dimma for having a crack at em, pity it was us (again) who were on the wrong end

It’s a fine line. You have to blame the afl and not the umps. Dimma handled exactly the way he should have.

Mollison is still a dickwad tho
 
Roos nailed it tonight.....same free kick paid against Jeremy Howe in round 12, why has it taken 10 rounds to get a clarification of the rule? And, more particularly, why has it taken 22 rounds to sort this crap out?
 
Wankley on AFL360 praising how quickly the AFL reacted to the rule change for studs up. Covering up for his master SHocking

The rule is a free paid for where it is likely to cause injury. So the umpires got in wrong paying the 2 frees against Jack. SHocking lied about the umpires getting the rule wrong.

730341
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Roos nailed it tonight.....same free kick paid against Jeremy Howe in round 12, why has it taken 10 rounds to get a clarification of the rule? And, more particularly, why has it taken 22 rounds to sort this crap out?
I've watched that incident a number of times now and, while I agree the studs up interpretation was wrong, I still think the main case for overturning the mark is that Howe clearly propelled his opponent forward in the marking contest. The conversation should never have been about the use of studs. The starting point should have been whether Howe's opponent was illegally pushed out of the contest. The fact that Howe used his foot to do so is incidental to the matter. Anyway, others may disagree and that's their prerogative. I do recall though that Howe was not overly disturbed by the decision at the time.
 

Basically have admitted that the rule was set up incorrectly, umpires were right but we were wrong.....a stupid rule change that was never needed to be made.

Good on Dimma for having a crack at em, pity it was us (again) who were on the wrong end
How come that Toby Greene karate kick is not a free for kicking in danger instead...nothing to do with JR!
 
Wankley on AFL360 praising how quickly the AFL reacted to the rule change for studs up. Covering up for his master SHocking

The rule is a free paid for where it is likely to cause injury. So the umpires got in wrong paying the 2 frees against Jack. SHocking lied about the umpires getting the rule wrong.

View attachment 730341
Yeah, Hocking seems to be walking both sides of the street here. It's fine standing up for your umpires but there'd be actual respect all round if everyone simply admitted that they got things wrong every now and again. He's doing the umpires no favours with these kinds of statements and just making himself look ridiculous.
 
I feel for the umps. AFL are screwing them over every week and as a result get abused and booed on the field. No wonder they're losing numbers.

Yep, not an easy gig. Every rule change opens a new box of problems. There are 18 Clubs all looking to understand and exploit were possible and a handful of umpires have to walk the line between that seems to get more grey by the season.
 
Yep, not an easy gig. Every rule change opens a new box of problems. There are 18 Clubs all looking to understand and exploit were possible and a handful of umpires have to walk the line between that seems to get more grey by the season.
That's the problem right there not enough grey area for the Umpires to allow the game to flow...
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

I feel for the umps. AFL are screwing them over every week and as a result get abused and booed on the field. No wonder they're losing numbers.

A little bit of that. They’re also wildly inconsistent and that’s a competency issue
 
A little bit of that. They’re also wildly inconsistent and that’s a competency issue

I think the inconsistency is also a combination of two other factors:

1. Rule book and constant adapting of rules has made a lot of grey space for i interpretation. Too many words and scenarios tied in to what could be black and white rules.

2. Pace of the modern game and stoppage style play. Biggest issue here is that the umpires can’t always see the play as it’s impossible to get in the best position. Eddie wasn’t completely wrong with his idea about no boundary umpires and having more field umpires who roam the boundaries providing 360 degree eyes on the contest at all times.

Bouncing the ball properly however... that’s a competency issue [emoji6]
 
I think the inconsistency is also a combination of two other factors:

1. Rule book and constant adapting of rules has made a lot of grey space for i interpretation. Too many words and scenarios tied in to what could be black and white rules.

2. Pace of the modern game and stoppage style play. Biggest issue here is that the umpires can’t always see the play as it’s impossible to get in the best position. Eddie wasn’t completely wrong with his idea about no boundary umpires and having more field umpires who roam the boundaries providing 360 degree eyes on the contest at all times.

Bouncing the ball properly however... that’s a competency issue [emoji6]

Umps shouldn’t need to execute a skill. Get rid of the bounce and ball it up. Having said that I’ve seen them **** that up a number of times too. Don’t know why they need to replace boundary umps just train them and give them the power to award free kicks.

I agree with your other points to a degree. Plenty of other examples when they see it fine and make a no call/wrong call.
 
Umps shouldn’t need to execute a skill. Get rid of the bounce and ball it up. Having said that I’ve seen them fu** that up a number of times too. Don’t know why they need to replace boundary umps just train them and give them the power to award free kicks.

I agree with your other points to a degree. Plenty of other examples when they see it fine and make a no call/wrong call.
Yeah that's all that needs to happen... but then they're not really "boundary umps" anymore ;)

The other option is to make a ballsy call and strip back the review and analysis and just say that we are going to accept human error and inconsistencies.
Make the umpires full time and give them the best experience and skillset we can and back them in. Unlikely though in the year 2019 ;)
 
Yeah that's all that needs to happen... but then they're not really "boundary umps" anymore ;)

The other option is to make a ballsy call and strip back the review and analysis and just say that we are going to accept human error and inconsistencies.
Make the umpires full time and give them the best experience and skillset we can and back them in. Unlikely though in the year 2019 ;)

You still need boundary umps to throw the ball in. They just need to the ability to call free kicks when play is near the boundary. I wouldn’t expect them to be calling free kicks in the field of play 50 meters away from the boundary line

Professionalising the umps has its pros and cons. Not sure it’s the answer but they should trial it for a year with a cohort and see anything changes
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom