Consider this a lumbagothey were shit tonight...........got freo over the line with their corrupt, meddling ways..........
mods please embargo this post until final siren
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Consider this a lumbagothey were shit tonight...........got freo over the line with their corrupt, meddling ways..........
mods please embargo this post until final siren
It'd have served you right if I stickied it.

Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Not just our games - HTB has been the the worst officiated rule in the AFL for a few yearsHow many HTBs did they miss that might've resulted in goals for us?
How many HTBs did they miss that might've resulted in goals for us?
Not just our games - HTB has been the the worst officiated rule in the AFL for a few years
The grey area of "made a legitimate attempt to dispose of the ball", makes incorrect disposal too hard to officiate on a consistent basis.Along with incorrect disposal (throwing/shovelling the ball).
The grey area of "made a legitimate attempt to dispose of the ball", makes incorrect disposal too hard to officiate on a consistent basis.
The rules need tweaking to be rewritten ti remove these grey areas so it's easier to make consistent decisions.
Sometimes I watch the games and think I don't understand the rules anymore.
'Made a legitmate attempt to dispose of the ball' is not a handball or a kick; it should be called incorrect disposal. For whatever reason, the AFL does not want to clean up incorrect disposal. I think it's because if they did that the amount of incorrect disposals called a game would skyrocket and stay high indefinitely, as you're now rewarding tacklers even more than you already are.The grey area of "made a legitimate attempt to dispose of the ball", makes incorrect disposal too hard to officiate on a consistent basis.
The rules need tweaking to be rewritten ti remove these grey areas so it's easier to make consistent decisions.
Sometimes I watch the games and think I don't understand the rules anymore.
but people keep complaining thinking somehow things will change............oh when, when will it stop raining in winter?Not just our games - HTB has been the the worst officiated rule in the AFL for 150 years
This! In some respects, they have removed the desire to actually try to get the ball. The player who has the sole desire of getting ball must get priority and protection. Otherwise, we have a game of dwellers. Unattractive football.'Made a legitmate attempt to dispose of the ball' is not a handball or a kick; it should be called incorrect disposal. For whatever reason, the AFL does not want to clean up incorrect disposal. I think it's because if they did that the amount of incorrect disposals called a game would skyrocket and stay high indefinitely, as you're now rewarding tacklers even more than you already are.
... which is why they need to start looking after the ball carrier much more than they are at present. Holding the man before having taken possession. Push in the back. High contact. Do these, and you've incentive to get the ball within congestion because the rules are protecting your right to take possession without impediment.
'Made a legitmate attempt to dispose of the ball' is not a handball or a kick; it should be called incorrect disposal. For whatever reason, the AFL does not want to clean up incorrect disposal. I think it's because if they did that the amount of incorrect disposals called a game would skyrocket and stay high indefinitely, as you're now rewarding tacklers even more than you already are.
... which is why they need to start looking after the ball carrier much more than they are at present. Holding the man before having taken possession. Push in the back. High contact. Do these, and you've incentive to get the ball within congestion because the rules are protecting your right to take possession without impediment.
Media blowback, coupled with the perception that as far as free kicks are concerned less is more.Im being totally serious, why would any of these be difficult? I feel ups are pretty strict with tacklers falling in to others backs, but at every stoppage in any game, I see players being tackled a split second before taking possession of the ball, why is it ignored?
The AFL want the game to open up, this would help with that. Makes no sense.
It should have been a ball up.Can someone explain to me why an umpire directly interfering in the play is not a ball up? I thought that was always the case.
Blamer
Agree, that was on the other umpires. AFL need to address this. The way the game is played this days, with zoning and pinpoint passing, if a player is blocked from marking the ball, there are generally opposition players close by who can quickly outnumber and cause damage with the turnover.It should have been a ball up.
It cost us a goal too.
I can't understand why one of the other umpires didn't call it.
It should have been a ball up.
It cost us a goal too.
I can't understand why one of the other umpires didn't call it.