Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Would have been okay with the mark not being paid to Young if they didn't pay the exact same thing to Heeney as a mark. The only difference between the two marks was one was in front of the Carlton goals and the other was in front of the Sydney goals.High tackles, bumps and throws not penalised at all.
On top of the OOF goal, and the mark not paid to Young.
Would have been okay with the mark not being paid to Young if they didn't pay the exact same thing to Heeney as a mark. The only difference between the two marks was one was in front of the Carlton goals and the other was in front of the Sydney goals.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Even the Faux commentators said that Heeney’s wasn’t a mark. He started taking the mark, then his hands rolled on the ball and it popped out. Young’s mark he has both hands on the ball, then his elbow got chopped and that tugged his hand away from the ball.Would have been okay with the mark not being paid to Young if they didn't pay the exact same thing to Heeney as a mark. The only difference between the two marks was one was in front of the Carlton goals and the other was in front of the Sydney goals.
It’s even more simple than them stuffing around with the rules. Why is the AFL partnering with gambling companies?Umpiring across the entire league is an absolute mess, all games are producing high numbers of incredibly poor decisions paid or missed…
When watching games at VFL reserves level, the umpiring is far more worse it’s at times quite comical and embarrassing, the future coming through doesn’t give you too much confidence…
AFL heads, Rules Committee, Head of Umpires are all guilty of over the past few decades in their respective roles, with continuous interference in over complicating many rules changes which were more simple to understand & implement…
And here we are now…
It can only be about revenue/profit…It’s even more simple than them stuffing around with the rules. Why is the AFL partnering with gambling companies?

You can blame 4 umpires on this. It means there are 9 umpires each week who prior to 4 umpires wouldn't have been considered good enough, they now get games and it trickles down to VFL. It was completely unnecessary and has not added anything since the introduction.Umpiring across the entire league is an absolute mess, all games are producing high numbers of incredibly poor decisions paid or missed…
When watching games at VFL reserves level, the umpiring is far more worse it’s at times quite comical and embarrassing, the future coming through doesn’t give you too much confidence…
AFL heads, Rules Committee, Head of Umpires are all guilty of over the past few decades in their respective roles, with continuous interference in over complicating many rules changes which were more simple to understand & implement…
And here we are now…
It’s either a stark lack in umpire training or a strategy to keep the game as confusing as possible especially during the home and away portion thereby creating maximum interest via controversy.The biggest issue for me is the stark difference between different umpires and their adjudications.
1 will see a mark. Another will not 1 will see a 10m kick, another won't. The list of different situations is almost endless.
Push. Not a push. Throw. Not a throw etc.
The lack of consistency on calls by different individuals happens in "every" game. I watch most games and it astounds me that 1 umpire at MCG earlier adjudicates an exact same situation that occurs in a later game, completely differently.
The problem is our rules are open for interpretation and different individuals will interpret them differently and call as such.
All I, and I suspect any fan wants, is consistency in their calls. Good luck. Not gunna happen unfortunately![]()
And their end of year bonus cheques. That's it. We made x this year from the supporters, clubs and our business partners... so our bonus cheques will be in the millions this year... again.It can only be about revenue/profit…
Good point and it’s something I’ve had the same thoughts about, the depth of umpiring looks to be more diluted than ever before, going back to three umpires should be worth considering again…You can blame 4 umpires on this. It means there are 9 umpires each week who prior to 4 umpires wouldn't have been considered good enough, they now get games and it trickles down to VFL. It was completely unnecessary and has not added anything since the introduction.
“It is alleged the fraud was happening when Mr Pannell gave 17 free kicks to the Bulldogs and only one to Adelaide in a 2016 game at Docklands Stadium.
The AFL did not respond to questions on Wednesday about whether it investigated that game, Mr Pannell’s career or had checked into his betting account history.
Riccuito said that Bulldogs and Crows game, and Mr Pannell’s career, needed to be reviewed after the allegations in court came to light.
“Adelaide ended up losing the game by 15 points, if you can believe it,” he said.
“The Bulldogs won the flag that year. If the Bulldogs had not have won that game, they probably would have finished eighth, probably wouldn’t have even advanced.”

Nah. The AFL can't be both a deeply shambolic operation and also so tightly run that they can fix matches over a period of years with nary a peep from a media pack that has an insatiable hunger for headlines.Is the AFL fixing matches? If it looks like a duck…
The biggest issue with the 4 umpire system is that each other interprets the rules in their own way. We've all seen one umpire pay a holding the ball decision, while another umpire a couple of minutes later, won't pay a free kick for the exact same action.You can blame 4 umpires on this. It means there are 9 umpires each week who prior to 4 umpires wouldn't have been considered good enough, they now get games and it trickles down to VFL. It was completely unnecessary and has not added anything since the introduction.
They're the guys who run the game out on the ground. If they are incompetent or corrupt, we get badly run games. If they're good, we never notice them. It's unfortunately been a long time since we had umpires that ran the game well and were basically unnoticed. Not since Razor Ray appeared on the scene and wanted to be the centre of attention during a game.There is an unhealthy obsession with the umpires across the AFL.
I think that we can agree that they're an amateur organisation trying to run a league that's worth billions. However, they are greedy and see any sort of profit for the league as a reason to write themselves million dollar bonus cheques. It's been like this since the AFL came into being.I think those with conspiracy theories regarding decision making is giving too much credit to the AFL. They’re not that organised or clever. They are a glorified country league admin making things up on the run and not thinking decisions through.
You're half right. The umpiring standard isn't that high and it should be much higher. But the rules of the game are pretty straight forward. Drop the ball in a tackle or throw the ball, incorrect disposal. Get tackled holding the ball, holding the ball. Get tackled without being in control of the ball, holding the man. And all the rest of the basic rules are equally as simple. If the umpires can't even get those right, they shouldn't be umpires.The umpire standard is not that high and the rules aren’t easy.