Groupie_
time to return the traditional Richmond yellow
its like if you make 10 million dollars but want 100 millionWhy is Longmuir complaining about the treatment of Amiss by Richmond’s defenders?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Soccer Notice Image
Champions League - FINAL - PSG v Arsenal ⚽ Europa Semis ⚽ 2026 FIFA Series A - Socceroos friendlies ⚽ The Matildas x 2026 Womens Asia Cup ⚽ Conference League - SEMIS! ⚽ Conference League - Rd of 16 ⚽ Socceroos Internat'l Friendlies ⚽ FA Cup - Man City Win
Fantasy Footy Notice Image Round 11
SuperCoach Rd 11 Rd 11 Talk - Trades - VC/C - Pendlebury Comp – Win A Badge - Fight MND Comp Returns ,//, AFL Fantasy Rd 11 Rd 11 Talk - Trades - The VC/C Thread
its like if you make 10 million dollars but want 100 millionWhy is Longmuir complaining about the treatment of Amiss by Richmond’s defenders?
oppos are genuinely fried
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
oppos are genuinely fried
I loved yzes responseHoly * harden up freo. This is the big league, not u10s.
Ive got no problem with boundary and goal umpires, but those field umpire and the farc campaigners can go **** themselves.THE UMPIRING AT THE MCG ON SUNDAY
Richmond supporters were livid. They had every right to be. The free kick count was 20-11, but that wasn’t the problem.
The problem was the number of free kicks umpires didn’t pay when it appeared the Tigers had earnt them.
Time and again, the Tigers would lay a tackle and not be rewarded for incorrect disposal.
Salt was added to the wound when the Dockers, at times, received free kicks for incorrect disposal by the Tigers.
Once again, confusion reigned about what exactly is prior opportunity. The more cynical Tigers supporter would say ‘what’s new’.
Over the past five years, Richmond’s differential between free kicks for and free kicks against is -332.
The next worst side is Hawthorn on -108. How can that properly be explained? Is there a vendetta? Or are the Tigers just sloppy or too aggressive with their tackling?
If this was politics, a Royal Commission would be demanded. And if this was politics, we’d love Tigers officials to have parliamentary privilege so we could hear what they really think.
![]()
Richmond fans were left stunned by some umpiring decisions. (Photo by Michael Willson/AFL Photos via Getty Images)
And yet the tigers cricketsWhat a *ing joke that is , he git his regulation gift free kick directly in front and that wasn’t enough
Naughton and co will get soft frees next week you watchWatch us get bent over again next week now that Freo have sooked. Nothing surer
To cover up the CFL umpiring rort.Why is Longmuir complaining about the treatment of Amiss by Richmond’s defenders?
Why isn’t someone at RFC complaining about the consistently corrupt umpiring is of bigger concern .Why is Longmuir complaining about the treatment of Amiss by Richmond’s defenders?
Surely we have, the club needs to communicate with its members much better.Why isn’t someone at RFC complaining about the consistently corrupt umpiring is of bigger concern .
oppos are genuinely fried
umps have to save bevvo's career next weekWatch us get bent over again next week now that Freo have sooked. Nothing surer
I've hardly watched it this year but I recall Robbo saying last year that he had a bet with Weakley for a bottle of wine and Weakley lost and weaseled his way out of it and didn't pay up.360 will be essential viewing tomorrow night. Always loved Robbo love him even more now
are roco and mark robbo aware that the league ceo used the words "competitive balancing mechanism" ??THE UMPIRING AT THE MCG ON SUNDAY
Richmond supporters were livid. They had every right to be. The free kick count was 20-11, but that wasn’t the problem.
The problem was the number of free kicks umpires didn’t pay when it appeared the Tigers had earnt them.
Time and again, the Tigers would lay a tackle and not be rewarded for incorrect disposal.
Salt was added to the wound when the Dockers, at times, received free kicks for incorrect disposal by the Tigers.
Once again, confusion reigned about what exactly is prior opportunity. The more cynical Tigers supporter would say ‘what’s new’.
Over the past five years, Richmond’s differential between free kicks for and free kicks against is -332.
The next worst side is Hawthorn on -108. How can that properly be explained? Is there a vendetta? Or are the Tigers just sloppy or too aggressive with their tackling?
If this was politics, a Royal Commission would be demanded. And if this was politics, we’d love Tigers officials to have parliamentary privilege so we could hear what they really think.
![]()
Richmond fans were left stunned by some umpiring decisions. (Photo by Michael Willson/AFL Photos via Getty Images)
CFL need Dogs to get back on the winners list alsoWatch us get bent over again next week now that Freo have sooked. Nothing surer