Unpopular Cricket Opinions

RobbyRoy

Premiership Player
Joined
May 3, 2007
Posts
4,413
Likes
1,838
Location
Perth
AFL Club
GWS
Other Teams
Victory
Been hugely impressed with Wells in the BBL this season. Knows when to go and when to play it safe and is finding the boundary much easier. Was looking alright in the shield as well. He's definitely no world beater but he's become very handy.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

PhatBoy

Brownlow Medallist
Joined
May 5, 2016
Posts
15,945
Likes
16,359
AFL Club
Geelong
The reverse sweep is a proper cricket shot and old farts need to stop whinging about players using it.
Hmm. Yes and no.
I can accept that some people play it as well as they play perfectly normal shots.

The problem with it is this:
1. Because of the logistics of the shot, you have to premeditate it. No batsman has the time to say ‘oh shit, the ball is going to pitch here, I know, I’ll reverse sweep it.’ You can do that with other shots because of your set up at the crease.
2. Therefore as a pre-meditated shot, you are automatically opening yourself up to trouble. All the bowler has to do is outthink the batsman and it becomes very dangerous. But unlike other ore-meditated shots, ie a slog, it’s very hard to bail out of a reverse sweep and just block or leave the ball.


It doesn’t matter how good a batsman gets at it, it will always carry at least slightly more risk than traditional shots
 

Park cricketer

All Australian
Joined
Nov 29, 2018
Posts
837
Likes
1,041
AFL Club
Adelaide
But unlike other ore-meditated shots, ie a slog, it’s very hard to bail out of a reverse sweep and just block or leave the ball.

It doesn’t matter how good a batsman gets at it, it will always carry at least slightly more risk than traditional shots
Maybe for mere mortals. But not if you're the legend that is Misbah.


 

archibald

Club Legend
Joined
Dec 15, 2004
Posts
1,326
Likes
2,080
AFL Club
Richmond
Hmm. Yes and no.
I can accept that some people play it as well as they play perfectly normal shots.

The problem with it is this:
1. Because of the logistics of the shot, you have to premeditate it. No batsman has the time to say ‘oh shit, the ball is going to pitch here, I know, I’ll reverse sweep it.’ You can do that with other shots because of your set up at the crease.
2. Therefore as a pre-meditated shot, you are automatically opening yourself up to trouble. All the bowler has to do is outthink the batsman and it becomes very dangerous. But unlike other ore-meditated shots, ie a slog, it’s very hard to bail out of a reverse sweep and just block or leave the ball.


It doesn’t matter how good a batsman gets at it, it will always carry at least slightly more risk than traditional shots
Jimmy Adams would disagree. Regularly pulled out the reverse block
 

Wallaby

Norm Smith Medallist
Joined
May 8, 2007
Posts
8,247
Likes
8,572
Location
vic
AFL Club
Richmond
Here's the thing that pisses me off about cricket analysis.

By it's very nature, batting in cricket is a risk/reward exercise. The best way not to get out is to take as few risks as possible. The best way to take the fewest risks is to not play any attacking shots. By their nature, attacking shots carry a greater risk of a batsman getting out.

In T20 and ODIs, you have to take more risks than in test cricket, purely because of the format of the game.

I'd be slightly more interested if commentators castigated a player for a 'poor shot selection' after he hits a six. Just because he hit it in the middle doesn't mean it was a good shot selection. If the risk was too great and he shouldn't have played it, point it out.

Yes, I'm annoyed about the analysis after Maxwell got out yesterday. He had been very successful batting the way he did when he got out. He executed badly, but it was not a bad choice of shot. Certainly no different to several he had played earlier.

Another classic example is the legendary 'Damien Martyn against South Africa' in 1994. It was a half-volley outside the off-stump. A test batsman is entitled to hit that. When 10 are needed to win, he should hit it. He hit it poorly - but there was nothing wrong with the choice of shot - just execution.
 

Kram

I'll brik u
Joined
May 2, 2007
Posts
52,872
Likes
66,041
Location
WA
AFL Club
Fremantle
Other Teams
Chicago Bears, de Boer, Arsenal
Hmm. Yes and no.
I can accept that some people play it as well as they play perfectly normal shots.

The problem with it is this:
1. Because of the logistics of the shot, you have to premeditate it. No batsman has the time to say ‘oh shit, the ball is going to pitch here, I know, I’ll reverse sweep it.’ You can do that with other shots because of your set up at the crease.
2. Therefore as a pre-meditated shot, you are automatically opening yourself up to trouble. All the bowler has to do is outthink the batsman and it becomes very dangerous. But unlike other ore-meditated shots, ie a slog, it’s very hard to bail out of a reverse sweep and just block or leave the ball.


It doesn’t matter how good a batsman gets at it, it will always carry at least slightly more risk than traditional shots
 

Damon_3388

Hall of Famer
Joined
Jun 23, 2008
Posts
30,504
Likes
23,272
Location
Headed for Kirribilli House
AFL Club
Collingwood
Other Teams
Norwood, Everton, Detroit Red WIngs
I see he recently wrote an article on cricinfo about playing the short ball, basically re-iterating for the 1000th time that he always got his head outside of the line and hence he is more adept and courageous than any modern day player
Apparently Chappelli's head movement was up there with Muhammad Ali in his prime.
 

Stopher

Norm Smith Medallist
Joined
Jul 19, 2012
Posts
8,803
Likes
13,146
Location
Gippsland
AFL Club
Essendon
Other Teams
Liverpool
I see he recently wrote an article on cricinfo about playing the short ball, basically re-iterating for the 1000th time that he always got his head outside of the line and hence he is more adept and courageous than any modern day player
Let's be honest, whatever else you may think of the man, he played first drop in that era of no helmets. Then off the field, he went head-to-head with a sacred cow like Bradman.

I think the guy is allowed a bit of a brag about the size of his nads!
 

PhatBoy

Brownlow Medallist
Joined
May 5, 2016
Posts
15,945
Likes
16,359
AFL Club
Geelong
I see he recently wrote an article on cricinfo about playing the short ball, basically re-iterating for the 1000th time that he always got his head outside of the line and hence he is more adept and courageous than any modern day player
By all accounts he was one of the best exponents of the hook and pull the game has seen so I don’t see why he shouldn’t be able to give advice from a position of knowledge
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

footyfan78

Brownlow Medallist
Joined
Aug 27, 2014
Posts
17,970
Likes
17,222
Location
spacetime
AFL Club
Carlton
Other Teams
there are no other teams worthy
The 'Salute' celebration after every wicket is lame.
If you talking about Sheldon Cotterell, he is a soldier in Jamaica so it just a fun tribute to his fellow military soldiers. I find it funny and enjoy such celebrations when they are part of your make up.
 
Top Bottom