Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The 2016 movie was an awful movie but it was far funnier then the originals. The originals werent comedies.It'll surely be more akin to GB 1 & 2 and have better jokes. Instead of the 2016 film which aimed for 40 year old virgin/bridesmaids style humour.
The three biggest failures of the 2016 "reboot"
1) The chosen cast (could have got "funnier" women)
2) The script
3) The director
They were comedies they were just had a more dry humour.The 2016 movie was an awful movie but it was far funnier then the originals. The originals werent comedies.
Pretty much all movies that are any good have some dry comedy. It doesnt make them comedies. A comedy has to make you laugh out loud.They were comedies they were just had a more dry humour.
Pretty much all movies that are any good have some dry comedy. It doesnt make them comedies. A comedy has to make you laugh out loud.
Says action first.Mate they are comedies.
From IMDb
Ghostbusters (1984)
Ghost Busters (original title)
PG | 1h 45min | Action, Comedy, Fantasy | 8 June 1984 (USA)
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0087332/
Ghostbusters II (1989)
PG | 1h 48min | Action, Comedy, Fantasy | 16 June 1989 (USA)
https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0097428/?ref_=tt_rec_tt
Ok this looks schmultzy as, but damnit I can see I’m gonna love it.
Seems to be about the world forgetting the Beatles existed except for one dude, who then cashes in on it.
Lily James too
Ok this looks schmultzy as, but damnit I can see I’m gonna love it.
Seems to be about the world forgetting the Beatles existed except for one dude, who then cashes in on it.
Lily James too
Ok this looks schmultzy as, but damnit I can see I’m gonna love it.
Seems to be about the world forgetting the Beatles existed except for one dude, who then cashes in on it.
Lily James too
Appears to be a Carrie/Superman crossover.