- May 6, 2007
- 39,631
- 23,283
- AFL Club
- Essendon
- Other Teams
- Tottenham Hotspurs, Melbourne Vixen
Anyone got Danger’s B/E?
Someone somewhere said it was 200 possibly
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Anyone got Danger’s B/E?
Anyone got Danger’s B/E?
209Someone somewhere said it was 200 possibly
Perfect.
Sounds good in theory, but how are you going to build the bank up?Perfect.
Mirra and that Essendon dude in next week, then Dangergoat the week after.
LDU>Coff only earns you $30k but is necessary sadlySounds good in theory, but how are you going to build the bank up?
We have 2 types of rookies this year. 80-100 averaging studs who we want to play on field until they run out of gas. 40-60 averaging spuds who are struggling to make it over $220k. There's no ~70 averaging rookies who pull the occasional decent score to boost themselves up to $300k quickly
Some context from my team:
currently $15k in the bank
rd 5:
LDU to Coffield
$50k bank
rd6:
Brayshaw to Guelfi (Garlett to mid)
Fritsch to Mirra (Garlett to fwd, Finlayson to mid)
$250k bank
rd 7:
(if I can afford it) Bonner to Danger (Finlayson to def)
or
Holman to rookie
rookie to Danger
that's basically 3 or 4 downgrades to get 1 player in... just doesn't seem right, even for Danger. Might have to look for bargains and skip Danger until the byes or something and hope he stays down until the 2nd half of the season. Zerrett for example at ~$490k could be a big bargain if he starts pumping out 100s
dunno what to do.. next couple weeks will be very interesting
Got 150k in the bank. Fritsh > Essendon dude should make 100k and Naughton > Mirra 150k. 400k to go Fogarty > Danger should be heaps. Want to keep Holman for the byes.Sounds good in theory, but how are you going to build the bank up?
We have 2 types of rookies this year. 80-100 averaging studs who we want to play on field until they run out of gas. 40-60 averaging spuds who are struggling to make it over $220k. There's no ~70 averaging rookies who pull the occasional decent score to boost themselves up to $300k quickly
Some context from my team:
currently $15k in the bank
rd 5:
LDU to Coffield
$50k bank
rd6:
Brayshaw to Guelfi (Garlett to mid)
Fritsch to Mirra (Garlett to fwd, Finlayson to mid)
$250k bank
rd 7:
(if I can afford it) Bonner to Danger (Finlayson to def)
or
Holman to rookie
rookie to Danger
that's basically 3 or 4 downgrades to get 1 player in... just doesn't seem right, even for Danger. Might have to look for bargains and skip Danger until the byes or something and hope he stays down until the 2nd half of the season. Zerrett for example at ~$490k could be a big bargain if he starts pumping out 100s
dunno what to do.. next couple weeks will be very interesting
Don't think you can pick Merrett until he breaks a tag. Dunno what Port were thinking not tagging him this weekend.Current top 3 targets:
Merrett looks likely to bottom out next week, started to hit some form on the weekend (with only 77% TOG) - but didn't look back to 100% yet.
$493K - 130 BE
Danger - wish he didn't miss round 1 so not starting him was my POD - 2 more weeks should see him hit mid 600's
$701k - 209 BE
Yeo - big bounce back week means his fall won't be as large as we had hoped, also bottoms out next week
$509k - 122 BE
Of the above I need to make sure I have the $$ for Danger which means I'm probably only considering Yeo or Merrett if a premo goes down
Don't think you can pick Merrett until he breaks a tag. Dunno what Port were thinking not tagging him this weekend.
Current top 3 targets:
Merrett looks likely to bottom out next week, started to hit some form on the weekend (with only 77% TOG) - but didn't look back to 100% yet.
$493K - 130 BE
I though Dev Smith was the one being tagged?Ebert was tagging him in the first where he had 8 touches, Rocky went to him from Q2 but also had little impact. Scored 95 through the Banfield tag.
Was managed through the dogs game (68% TOG)
Got tagged a lot last year and worked through those too.
R10 - Tagged by Lambert - 87
R16 - Tagged by Greenwood - 109
R17 - Tagged by Stevens - 120
R19 - Tagged by Libba - 67
R22 - Tagged by Miller - 92
2017 Tagged Average - 95
Seems like the 'needs to learn to cop a tag' line has been overplayed for Merrett a bit due to a really slow start post concussion.
Given how poorly how midfield as performed so far this year I can see Merrett getting involved a lot more going forward, but that also strengthens the argument teams should continue to put work into him.
Ebert took turns on bothI though Dev Smith was the one being tagged?
The gun rooks will start to drop off, as usual. Looks maybe like Holman is first to break. If they could just do it in a calm orderly fashion instead STB all at once that would be great.Sounds good in theory, but how are you going to build the bank up?
We have 2 types of rookies this year. 80-100 averaging studs who we want to play on field until they run out of gas. 40-60 averaging spuds who are struggling to make it over $220k. There's no ~70 averaging rookies who pull the occasional decent score to boost themselves up to $300k quickly
Some context from my team:
currently $15k in the bank
rd 5:
LDU to Coffield
$50k bank
rd6:
Brayshaw to Guelfi (Garlett to mid)
Fritsch to Mirra (Garlett to fwd, Finlayson to mid)
$250k bank
rd 7:
(if I can afford it) Bonner to Danger (Finlayson to def)
or
Holman to rookie
rookie to Danger
that's basically 3 or 4 downgrades to get 1 player in... just doesn't seem right, even for Danger. Might have to look for bargains and skip Danger until the byes or something and hope he stays down until the 2nd half of the season. Zerrett for example at ~$490k could be a big bargain if he starts pumping out 100s
dunno what to do.. next couple weeks will be very interesting
Looking to r14 caused a chain of terrible decisions that really f---ed my starting team more than one lousy score would have done. I forgot in my calculations that if i delete my team before r14, the negative impact of the bye becomes largely irrelevant :SSince we're looking forward. Anyone else not going to be able to field a team in round 14?
Current top 3 targets:
Merrett looks likely to bottom out next week, started to hit some form on the weekend (with only 77% TOG) - but didn't look back to 100% yet.
$493K - 130 BE
Danger - wish he didn't miss round 1 so not starting him was my POD - 2 more weeks should see him hit mid 600's
$701k - 209 BE
Yeo - big bounce back week means his fall won't be as large as we had hoped, also bottoms out next week
$509k - 122 BE
Of the above I need to make sure I have the $$ for Danger which means I'm probably only considering Yeo or Merrett if a premo goes down
You'll have so many players to trade in before it and you'll basically be fully premo by thenSince we're looking forward. Anyone else not going to be able to field a team in round 14?
Crouch, Oliver and Danger have a spot in my team, the others...Just quickly on Zerrett, he's averaging the same amount of contested possessions as last year and hes played 16% less TOG. In his only full game in the JLT he had 140 SC with a very high contested disposal count. I think hes playing more inside this year? And with Myers playing okay he could be the big body support Merrett needs. He also has a 9 or 10 day break.
Zorko I think is a busted pick because he has no support, isnt playing finals and has ticked off becoming AA. Not much to play for. Also his disposal count is unusually low and his role was weird in round 1.
Neale I like, but hes butchering it a bit at the moment and has that bye.
Danger is a bit off at the moment, I think he could go as low as 550k. Even though hes a bit off he's still top 20. Will look at him in about a month.
Hannebery is interesting and I think may come good after the bye, he could be under 450k. Perhaps Tim Kelly to Hanners, wait and see.
MCrouch I like, he should drop to around 520k. More upside than Neale.
If Collingwood are in the running for finals then I like Pendlebury later in the season. He's had some injury concerns of late though.