Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
I quite like Urquart but as a matter of interest, who was the last player genuinely delisted (as distinct from traded) by one club who went on to make a real career (100+games) at another club?
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
I'd definitely be willing to draft him via national (last few rounds) or PSD
Wasn't Nick Lower previously on a list before Freo picked him up?
Podsiadly anyone?
So, Brad Scott labels him as a 'required player' going into trade week and then delists him straight afterwards? Man, I'm tired of the shennanigans that go on at trade time...
Someone can correct me here, but I think it was last season that Scott called Urquhart a required player? Unless he said it before this trade period as well?
NORTH Melbourne is committed to paying the bulk of Gavin Urquhart's $300,000-plus contract next year even if he is taken by another club, despite de-listing the midfielder.
But the club has agreed to re-draft Urquhart as a rookie and retain him if he is not picked up earlier in the drafts (national or rookie).
Urquhart has one year to run on a three-year contract, which did not stop the Roos from cutting the running defender after the trading period, when he was put up for trade but did not find another club.
I quite like Urquart but as a matter of interest, who was the last player genuinely delisted (as distinct from traded) by one club who went on to make a real career (100+games) at another club?
Can a club continue to pay another player's salary if a trade is not involved? Not sure I can recall a situation where a draftee is still paid by the club that delisted him once he has been re-drafted by another club. It could happen, I suppose. It just seems unusual.
Can a club continue to pay another player's salary if a trade is not involved? Not sure I can recall a situation where a draftee is still paid by the club that delisted him once he has been re-drafted by another club. It could happen, I suppose. It just seems unusual.
That's the way that I think it would work. Some sort of settlement deed to allow the contract to be terminated but with any future earnings of GU (during the contract period) deducted from the amount of the financial settlement paid by North to GU.Delisted while on contract is a nice word for "sacked". If he isn't drafted by another club then North are obliged to payout his contract. If he is drafted then he shouldn't have to take a pay cut - otherwise he'd be forced to stand out for a season to get his money.
Any club willing to draft Urquhart would pay him only the bargain-basement minimum wage, leaving North to pick up the balance of his $300,000-plus final year.
Link ....
Can a club continue to pay another player's salary if a trade is not involved? Not sure I can recall a situation where a draftee is still paid by the club that delisted him once he has been re-drafted by another club. It could happen, I suppose. It just seems unusual.
Never understood that. Surely, he had gone AWOL often enough that he could be sacked outright.It's happened. To us no less.
![]()
Hawthorn paid him minimum wage and we were forced to pay out the balance.
