Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Great performance from Rafa. Who would have thought this time last year that Rafa and Roger would win 2 Slams each in 2017.
Sent from my HTC 2PS6200 using Tapatalk
For those calling Nadal's draw soft, Federer won about 8 of his slams before Djokovic Nadal Murray Del Potro etc were around but the best player was Hewitt and aging stars such as Agassi.
It's easy to criticise but really a pretty piss poor attempt to demean a great achievement because of unrequited and misdirected love for Federer.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
But it was a soft draw. This was an ATP500 event at best. The highest Seed he played was 24(a very good 24). That is amazing. I would say that regardless of whom won. Does it matter? Not to me. You beat who you beat and Nadal has been the most consistent player on tour all year.For those calling Nadal's draw soft, Federer won about 8 of his slams before Djokovic Nadal Murray Del Potro etc were around but the best player was Hewitt and aging stars such as Agassi.
It's easy to criticise but really a pretty piss poor attempt to demean a great achievement because of unrequited and misdirected love for Federer.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
For those calling Nadal's draw soft, Federer won about 8 of his slams before Djokovic Nadal Murray Del Potro etc were around but the best player was Hewitt and aging stars such as Agassi.
It's easy to criticise but really a pretty piss poor attempt to demean a great achievement because of unrequited and misdirected love for Federer.
Weak men's draw this year, particularly on Rafa's side. And I thought Federer's Wimbledon was soft, he at least played Dimitrov and Cilic on grass.
anyway, I really enjoyed Del v Theim/Fed. Shame he couldn't go all the way but Nadal really stepped it up in that match. But outside of that, I can't think of any classics once again. I guess Anderson v Querrey was alright in tightness and drama if that is your thing.
On the women's side, the best match may have been on the first night. Sharapova v Halep. I only watched the end of Stephens and Venus and that was meant to be fantastic as well. The little I watched was gripping and great tennis. Kvitova v Venus was good as well. The WTA has had a great year.
Hopefully, at the Aus Open, Gen Next will be ready in the form of a beefed up Sascha and he can get that big result he needs at a grand slam level to gain confidence. That men's draw will be wacky with Murray, Nole, Kei(among others) all having injury affected rankings.
And heck, the women's side might have Serena and Azarenka in an already crowded line up of great players.
Can't wait.
The fact you actually think Dimintrov was "hard" lol...he's a mental head case.
Cilic was injured in the final! Call a spade a spade at least!
Port Adelaide made FinalsBut it was a soft draw. This was an ATP500 event at best. The highest Seed he played was 24(a very good 24). That is amazing. I would say that regardless of whom won. Does it matter? Not to me. You beat who you beat and Nadal has been the most consistent player on tour all year.
Should we put * on all of Nole, Murray, Fed and Nadal Grand Slams because of the weak generation after them. of course not. You beat who you beat. You should do the same regarding Feds early slams.
EDIT: this twitter post just showcases how mazing bad the mens draw was this year
Cilic had an emotional meltdown in that final.
Did she win both women's and mixed??Martina Hingis won another Slam today.
Did she win both women's and mixed??