NWO/Illuminati US politics - Pt 5

[Kurve]

Here is PART 4

Donald Trump was sworn in as president of the United States on Monday 20th January, 2025 in Washington DC.

The Assassination of Charlie Kirk

Take Note

Anti-trans commentary and nastiness will be deleted and warnings issued.

 

[Cyber_punk]

If the Trump Administration found a cure for cancer the Dem's would complain about all the unemployed oncologists.

If anything we are going to see cancer rates skyrocket in the coming years and decades due to the Trump administration gutting regulations

Trump officials quietly move to reverse bans on toxic ‘forever chemicals’

EPA bids to change chemical risk evaluations, which could expose public to higher levels of PFAS and other pollutants

www.theguardian.com

The Trump administration is quietly carrying out a plan that aims to kill hundreds of bans on highly toxic Pfas “forever chemicals” and other dangerous compounds in consumer goods.

The bans, largely at the state level, touch most facets of daily life, prohibiting everything from bisphenol in children’s products to mercury in personal care products to Pfas in food packaging and clothing.


If successful, the public would almost certainly be exposed to much higher levels of chemicals linked to a range of serious health issues such as cancer, hormone disruption, liver disease, birth defects, and reproductive system damage

 

[Bloods86]

Christ wasn't arguing with the Pharisees about whether the strict conditions of the Sabbath still applied. He was questioning their rigid/incorrect interpretation and pointing out that the Sabbath was intended to be a blessing to people not a burden after they questioned him (of all things) on whether he should be allowed to heal people on the Sabbath.

They sound like Democrats! If the Trump Administration found a cure for cancer the Dem's would complain about all the unemployed oncologists.

This sounds an awful lot like Jesus arguing whether the strict conditions of the Sabbath still applied, given the penalties outlined in the OT for acts such as gathering wood and food on the Sabbath, something which Jesus and his disciples were also judged for by the Pharisees (and where he argued if this applied).

I'll leave the nonsensical Dems/cancer quip alone, particularly odd given Trump administration actions.

 

[Lebbo73]

Hmmm now where have I heard this before?

You've deleted your original post of course, but the BF quote function remembers


Don't suppose I can interest you in an sig bet on it?

That only didn’t happen because the RINOs blocked it.

 

[Lebbo73]

Yeah. In 1867.

A mistake anyone could make really, including the current sitting US president

Are you contractually obligated to run defense for dear leader on literally every brainfart or something?

He’s pulling the piss and you fell for it like usual

 

[Lebbo73]

That's a rather reductive (and largely inaccurate) representation of what 1984 is about.

Nineteen Eighty-Four - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Things like erasing the contributions of people of colour in the military:

U.S. Department of Defense censorship of DEI-connected material - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

And firing someone who didn't produce the figures he wanted:

https://www.politico.com/news/2025/08/01/trump-firing-bureau-labor-statistics-chief-jobs-report-00488960

Fair enough. This person produced knowingly false figures all the way through the Biden Residency!

 

[bourbons]

Not at all, just think this one is a nothing burger as usual.

Yep, that sure would have been your take had Biden said it

 

[HitTheNailOnTheHead]

This sounds an awful lot like Jesus arguing whether the strict conditions of the Sabbath still applied, given the penalties outlined in the OT for acts such as gathering wood and food on the Sabbath, something which Jesus and his disciples were also judged for by the Pharisees (and where he argued if this applied).

I don't recall anywhere in the gospels describing Jesus or his disciples gathering wood or sticks. It's a fair stretch to say that plucking the ears of the grain would constitute gathering sticks. In any case as Jesus pointed out the priests worked in the temple on the Sabbath and were blameless under the law since they were involved in God's work, something Christ pointed out to the Pharisees his disciples were also involved with.

 

[Lebbo73]

If anything we are going to see cancer rates skyrocket in the coming years and decades due to the Trump administration gutting regulations

Trump officials quietly move to reverse bans on toxic ‘forever chemicals’

EPA bids to change chemical risk evaluations, which could expose public to higher levels of PFAS and other pollutants

www.theguardian.com

Cancers have already skyrocketed over the last four years due to climate change!

 

[Mofra]

Cancers have already skyrocketed over the last four years due to climate change!

Thank God Kentucky passed legislation to ban chemtrails...

 

[Bloods86]

I don't recall anywhere in the gospels describing Jesus or his disciples gathering wood or sticks. It's a fair stretch to say that plucking the ears of the grain would constitute gathering sticks. In any case as Jesus pointed out the priests worked in the temple on the Sabbath and were blameless under the law since they were involved in God's work, something Christ pointed out to the Pharisees his disciples were also involved with.

It is an example of how catering for basic necessities was judged on the Sabbath in the OT. My direct comparison related to gathering food. Jesus also made a general defence of the acts (which you alluded to), not related to an equivalence of his disciples to priests.

In any case, this clear change in conditions and penalties is several degrees from my original query/post which at least related to US politics.

 

[bourbons]

Bit of a reach there Bourbons. 1984 is about the altering of history to feed the State's propaganda.

Dunno mate, that sounds pretty close to "aligning the institution’s content with President Donald Trump’s interpretation of American history" to me, considering the president we're talking about.

I mean lets be honest, he's the most propagandising president in US history.

 

[T2B_]

Dunno mate, that sounds pretty close to "aligning the institution’s content with President Donald Trump’s interpretation of American history" to me, considering the president we're talking about.

I mean lets be honest, he's the most propagandising president in US history.

Yeah but, relaaaaaaax guy! Its okay as long as he owns the libs, he can do whatever he wants

 

[bourbons]

If anything we are going to see cancer rates skyrocket in the coming years and decades due to the Trump administration gutting regulations

Trump officials quietly move to reverse bans on toxic ‘forever chemicals’

EPA bids to change chemical risk evaluations, which could expose public to higher levels of PFAS and other pollutants

www.theguardian.com

Its quite the theme for the current admin.

Justice Dept. says ending Louisiana petrochemical case helps 'dismantle radical DEI programs'

The Justice Department is celebrating its decision to drop a federal lawsuit against a Louisiana petrochemical plant accused of worsening cancer risks for residents in a majority-Black community.

apnews.com

Biden admin's efforts to stop kids breathing cancer-causing chemicals (there's a school close to the plant) in an area known as 'cancer alley' in Louisiana was DEI apparently

Ahh but its all good coz Trump wheeled out a kid with cancer as as a prop for a speech once and Democrats didn't cheer, thats how you know they're the evil ones

 

[bourbons]

That only didn’t happen because the RINOs blocked it.

rofl

Let me know when you work out what your story is

He wasn’t the president!

So, that sig bet on Obama getting indicted before the mid terms?

 

[bourbons]

He’s pulling the piss and you fell for it like usual

Haha

Wow yeah, an expertly crafted strategem there just to get us all thinking he's weapons grade moron. Well played Donnie, 4D chess at its finest

He either didn't know Alaska was a US state or he has no idea where he's meeting Putin, mate. Granted it's probably the 2nd option, still fairly disqualifying I would have thought and MAGA would be having conniptions if Biden had said it, you know this.

 

[FlowersByIrene]

Dunno mate, that sounds pretty close to "aligning the institution’s content with President Donald Trump’s interpretation of American history" to me, considering the president we're talking about.

I mean lets be honest, he's the most propagandising president in US history.

"Now, if Bourbons were forced to look directly at the firelight, wouldn't his eyes be pained? Wouldn't he turn away and run back to those things which he normally perceived and understand them as more defined and clearer than the things now being brought to his attention".

 

[bourbons]

"Now, if Bourbons were forced to look directly at the firelight, wouldn't his eyes be pained? Wouldn't he turn away and run back to those things which he normally perceived and understand them as more defined and clearer than the things now being brought to his attention".

Fairly unsurprising that this was the best response you could muster.

edit: haaaaaahahaha and you've literally got the quote from 1984 in your sig, how have I never noticed this before and how do you somehow keep getting funnier and more contradictory in your professed views. Like... I don't think it was intended as an instruction manual, which is the only way your shtick on here could possibly make sense

 

[Cyber_punk]

Its quite the theme for the current admin.

Justice Dept. says ending Louisiana petrochemical case helps 'dismantle radical DEI programs'

The Justice Department is celebrating its decision to drop a federal lawsuit against a Louisiana petrochemical plant accused of worsening cancer risks for residents in a majority-Black community.

apnews.com

Biden admin's efforts to stop kids breathing cancer-causing chemicals (there's a school close to the plant) in an area known as 'cancer alley' in Louisiana was DEI apparently

Ahh but its all good coz Trump wheeled out a kid with cancer as as a prop for a speech once and Democrats didn't cheer, thats how you know they're the evil ones

If RFK Jr had stuck to fighting that and not throwing the baby out with the bathwater re vaccines and other lunacy he'd be half alright.

My specialist doctor agreed with me about micro/nano plastics being our generations cigarette health crisis, except much worse because there is no escape, only management. Nobody really appreciates how much we are drowning in it like they didn't know how bad smoking was in the first half of last century.

 

[FlowersByIrene]

Fairly unsurprising that this was the best response you could muster.

edit: haaaaaahahaha and you've literally got the quote from 1984 in your sig, how have I never noticed this before and how do you somehow keep getting funnier and more contradictory in your professed views. Like... I don't think it was intended as an instruction manual, which is the only way your shtick on here could possibly make sense

There is no contradiction here my friend

 

[bourbons]

There is no contradiction here my friend

You know, I actually accept that you truly do believe that. Which makes it all the funnier

You realise you've just described the current admin in the US that you support to a tee, yeah?

Tell me you realise that

Its uncanny how bad your dear leader's admin is on every issue or grievance you routinely wheel out

 

[HitTheNailOnTheHead]

If anything we are going to see cancer rates skyrocket in the coming years and decades due to the Trump administration gutting regulations

Trump officials quietly move to reverse bans on toxic ‘forever chemicals’

EPA bids to change chemical risk evaluations, which could expose public to higher levels of PFAS and other pollutants

www.theguardian.com

I think the Guardian might have a slightly jaundiced view of what's really happening as far as PFAS is concerned. The Trump admin is allowing water utilities an extra 2 years to build treatment plants. The Biden proposals were rushed, unworkable and ill considered (according to AI searches).

This article looks at what it was going to cost.

Removing PFAS from public water systems will cost billions and take time – here are ways you can filter out harmful ‘forever chemicals’ at home

Filtering out PFAS is only the first step. These ‘forever chemicals’ still have to be destroyed, and there are many questions about how to do that safely.

theconversation.com

On the issue of asbestos, the Guardian article is now out of date. BTW do you really think we're much better off in Australia with regard to action on PFAS?

 

[HitTheNailOnTheHead]

I think the important aspect to remember in the gerrymandering occurring in Texas is that ...

Redistricting: what the left and the media call it when Democrats redraw electoral maps.

Gerrymandering: what they label it when Republicans do the same.

 

[Mofra]

History repeats itself.

 

[Ghost Patrol]