NWO/Illuminati US politics

Who should be POTUS?


  • Total voters
    41

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.

Log in to remove this ad.

The "plausible explanation" you're looking for is that none of the things you describe actually happened. Ask any number of Republican-appointed Judges, Republican officials, Republican Governors and legislators, right-leaning commentators, and millions of ordinary people who have not lost their minds like you.

Dbw8_WyU0AA6cVU.jpg
 
There's more than 50 words. It's a paragraph with poor punctuation.

How many full stops are there? One. It's a sentence.

Paragraphs are 3-8 sentences long with 100 - 200 words. Stop doubling down on your mistake and move on.



 
Last edited:
How many full stops are there? One. It's a sentence.

Paragraphs are 3-8 sentences long with 100 - 200 words. Stop doubling down on your mistake and move on.




Yeah but who invented English?

 
Yeah but who invented English?

Certainly not insidegovuk.blog.gov.uk that's for sure.


Not sure how you thought a link to an out of date government directive to dumb things down so the lowest common denominator can understand government policy adds to your argument.

Did you read the first sentence?

The information in this blogpost may now be out of date. See the current GOV.UK content and publishing guidance.

The up to date version now says this ...

Short sentences
People with some learning disabilities read letter for letter - they do not bounce around like other users. They also cannot fully understand a sentence if it’s too long.

People with moderate learning disabilities can understand sentences of 5 to 8 words without difficulty. By using common words we can help all users understand sentences of around 25 words.


No 25 word sentence length limit now, just a suggestion to try and limit them to 'around' that length. Like I said stop doubling down and move on.
 
Last edited:
The "plausible explanation" you're looking for is that none of the things you describe actually happened. Ask any number of Republican-appointed Judges, Republican officials, Republican Governors and legislators, right-leaning commentators, and millions of ordinary people who have not lost their minds like you.


You're in for a rude awakening when this election is flipped
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

The election result is not getting flipped unless an insider comes forward with smoking gun proof that the electronic voting machines were rigged.
That's alrady happened, audits of Dominion machines yesterday have confirmed that the machine weighted votes in favour of Biden (i.e a vote for Biden equalled 1.23 votes and a vote for Trump equalled 0.77 votes). It's all coming out.
 
That's alrady happened, audits of Dominion machines yesterday have confirmed that the machine weighted votes in favour of Biden (i.e a vote for Biden equalled 1.23 votes and a vote for Trump equalled 0.77 votes). It's all coming out.
It's still not getting any traction through the MSM and hence the general public though.
 
It's still not getting any traction through the MSM and hence the general public though.

True.

Made to a Dutch news outlet though.

 
Can someone answer me why you would do all 3 of those?

You only need to do 1 of those actions to cheat so you win so what is the point of the other 2?
You're seeking a rational response, but the people who believe any of this stuff happened aren't rational. Hence the crickets.
 
Can someone answer me why you would do all 3 of those?

You only need to do 1 of those actions to cheat so you win so what is the point of the other 2?

You've miscounted. There's 4.

(1) Produce pristine (not folded and therefore unmailed) ballots almost all marked for Biden.
(2) Fight against recounts.
(3) Count ballots in secret.
(4) Block access to voting machines for analyst examination.

Many don't work so well to overthrow an election by themselves. (1) works better when allied with (3) for instance.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top