would have been a shoe in for Boxing Day with Marsh and Warner possibly both missing...
I'd have thought Burns would be ahead of him
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
would have been a shoe in for Boxing Day with Marsh and Warner possibly both missing...
Agree. Good FC player, but beyond that just didn't cut the mustard. He'd constantly a start but never capitalised, 10 times in his test career he made over 20 runs, for 2 x50s and 0 x100s, these figures just aren't acceptable for someone at test level.
I'm his biggest supporter Kram and even I'm saying no. Had enough chances overseas now.Sure it's only one Test but he looked awful in this match, does he get another go for Test 2?
So who's the poor sod who has to play the sole 2nd test in place of Khawaja?
It makes a lot of sense to continue with Khawaja - what's the worst that can happen?
Why do it make sense to continue with him in Asia?
Because there's nothing to gain by introducing a noob for a single test - he will be in a no-win situation.
0-2?It makes a lot of sense to continue with Khawaja - what's the worst that can happen?
Because there's nothing to gain by introducing a noob for a single test - he will be in a no-win situation.
Why does it have to be a single test? Not as if Cartwright wouldn't score runs in Australia.
Why would we dump khawaja for the ashes?
He has dominated at home in recent years and was our best vs SA when they were all over us, as s**t as things are right now i still want our best side for the ashes as losing that won't make us any better in asia and reality is our next tour where spin will be a threat isn't until march 2019 when we got the uae to play pakistan.
Since when has he proven to score runs against quality pace attacks? All he's proven is that he can bat on a flat deck. He can't play spin, spinners on flat decks are not the same as spinners on non-flat decks.If it was a simple as just bring your spinner on then usman would have failed the last few years at home and in nz, he like warner can survive spin at home and then destroy pace attacks.
My issue is we are basically saying lets dump somebody we know can score runs vs quality pace(with 9 tests vs sa/eng ahead)in the hope that a year and a half from now his replacement might play well in the uae but for all we know that new bloke might struggle vs pace and might not be the answer in asia anyway.
We still have to pick the ashes side based on the ashes needs as we are far too weak to be picking project players for a 2 test series in march 2019.
Tell me you are not saying those decks against NZ were anything but flat? Did something for like an hour (of which we won the toss sent them in and rolled them)...and then was a flat road.
I still don't get what you guys are aiming at though?
Im talking about our strongest team to face englands quicks on those typical aussie decks, we don't have blokes who can dominate the best swing bowlers in the world in places like england and i wasn't saying usman is that bloke but once again what on earth has that go to do with picking our best top 6 for facing englands quicks on typical aussie pitches.
if warner had failed in this last knock he still would be our best pick for opener at home vs england on our pitches, not defending the serious flaws these blokes have i just don't want us losing the ashes as well as losing in asia and the notion that we can just pic any 6 randoms out of the shield and they will surely belt englands attack around because the pitches are flat is just silly.