Art Vandelay_
TheBrownDog
- Oct 28, 2012
- 104,470
- 142,376
- AFL Club
- Geelong
- Other Teams
- Bushrangers - Tottenham
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: Richmond v Melbourne - 7:25PM Wed
Squiggle tips Demons at 77% chance -- What's your tip? -- Team line-ups »
Which makes Riley's refusal to encourage the use of pitch side monitors where the actual ref makes the decision bizarre.
Well it can’t be the Everton thread because no one would post in itLet's start a petition to rename this the Liverpool thread
We'd also have to look like scoring a goal.Well it can’t be the Everton thread because no one would post in it
It all depends on whether you want to give the benefit of doubt to the attacker or defender. Reality is the linesman has no hope of making the correct call on these tight ones, so saying leave it to the officials is moot as they would just be guessing
That’s a very broad definition though. It needs to be hard and fast but maybe they need to allow a 10cm margin so that anything given as offside definitely is. Under 10 cm the attacker gets the benefitRule should be written so the benefit goes to the attacker. Offside only given if it's visible to the naked eye.
Like they have on numerous occasions this season like the Chelsea example I gave earlier.VAR: Attacking possession phase explained
www.premierleague.com
Good explanation of whst VAR looks at. Only the immediate phase of play is looked at. For the LFC opener vs Wolves VAR got it spot on. Lallana passed to Mane, VAR can only rule on those two things. Makes sense becase if you didnt limit VAR to the immwdiate phase of play you could go back endlessly and find all sorts of minor infringements.
Like they have on numerous occasions this season like the Chelsea example I gave earlier.
It was explained at that time that as the defence didn't have the opportunity to reset, VAR could rule.
A phase of play isn't limited to the shot or the pass before it. Which is exactly what it says in the link you provided.
Former referee gives verdict on van Dijk 'hand ball' in Liverpool vs Wolves
Virgil van Dijk was accused of handling the ball during the build-up to Sadio Mane's winner for Liverpool against Wolves on Sundaywww.google.com
Also your Chelsea example isnt comparable. The player that crossed the ball was the one that was offside.
VAR could only rule on Lallana and Mane. It was correct to reverse the Lallana handball call.